hodinkee.jp 67 C
🛡️ SEO 50 🤖 GEO 78 ⚡ Perf 65 🏗️ Arch 67

hodinkee.jp — Global SEODiff Score 67/100

hodinkee.jp
📊

hodinkee.jp shows strong AI visibility with an ACRI of 77/100, outperforming 86% of indexed domains. Within the infrastructure vertical, this places hodinkee.jp above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Content is delivered server-side, meaning bots and AI agents can parse the full page without executing JavaScript. The 6.8× token bloat ratio falls within the normal range, though there is room to trim navigation, footer, and script overhead. The site includes 2 schema blocks, providing adequate structured data for basic entity recognition. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

67
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (50) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 6 snapshots
Mar 1 Mar 21
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
📉 Mar 21 ACRI -1 (54→53)
🔄 Mar 19 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 13 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than hodinkee.jp?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)50 × 0.25 = 12.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)78 × 0.40 = 31.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)65 × 0.20 = 13.0
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)67 × 0.15 = 10.0
Weighted sum = 12.5 + 31.2 + 13.0 + 10.0
Global SEODiff Score = 67 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
97
Rendering
avg 93
43
Structure
avg 35
44
Schema
avg 9
80
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 50%+
Rank #625721
-48 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 14%
Score 77/100

hodinkee.jp ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 50%+) than in AI search (Top 14%). This is the 'Visibility Gap' pattern — implementing the recommendations above can help close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why hodinkee.jp ranks here

Tech stackShopify
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage2 blocks
Token bloat6.8×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

50/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

49 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

324 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✗ Has <h2> headings — found 0
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://hodinkee.jp/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Hodinkee Japan (ホディンキー 日本版)
  • ✗ og:description
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

78/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
hodinkee.jp
53
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 10%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 43/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 29 elements (29 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words528
Raw Density5.5%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks2 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

63
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability63/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

14%
🗑️ 86%
Useful Content (18.2 KB)Bloat (106.0 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio6.8× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context25% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage3 / 12 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Only 25% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 85.4% · SNR: 0.17 · Signal: 4647 / Noise: 27134 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of hodinkee.jp and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
The Ressence Type 9 IKE is a limited-edition luxury timepiece featuring a rotating dial adorned with intricate lacquer work and
Target Audience
Watch collectors, luxury goods enthusiasts, art lovers, and individuals interested in unique and innovative timepieces. Specifically targeting those with an appreciation for Japanese craftsmanship and a fascination with futuristic aesthetics.
Pricing Model
High-end, limited production. Price: CHF 32,000 (approximately $35,000 USD).
🔗 Integration Partners
ETA 2892
🏆 Competitive Moat
Unique ROCS (Ressence Orbital Convex System) mechanism with a rotating dial, combined with the intricate lacquer and mother-of-pearl decoration, creating a visually and mechanically complex timepiece unlike any other.
📊 Content Depth
9/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Integration directory pagesTemplate comparison pages
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Thin landing pages for features
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-29

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkShopify
AI-Readiness Score80/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time601 ms
Raw HTML Size124.1 KB
Visible Text Size18.2 KB

Performance & Speed

65/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

601 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1013
DOM nodes
124 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → max-age=0, private, must-revalidate
  • ✓ CDN cache status → DYNAMIC
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

67/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

210
internal links
20
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 53/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for hodinkee.jp
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/hodinkee.jp" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=hodinkee.jp" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
53
Single-page score
-47
Severe hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
6
Avg across 10 pages · Range 0–61
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 53, but internal pages average only 6 — a -47-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Total Words
1080
Avg Bloat
2.9×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://hodinkee.jp/blog
HODINKEEIntroducing: レッセンス Type 9 IKE、螺鈿で描く電脳世界を遊泳するダイヤルIntroducing: シチズン×セコンド/セコンド、新作ツヨサでノイズも文字盤も切り裂くRecommended Reading: 写真集『GRAND SEIKO』、海外の視点で切り取られたグランドセイコーの美と現在地Introducing: フランスのBND、手頃な価格でヴィンテージダイバーズの魅力を再現Introducing: ハブリング²×SJXのコラボモデル、クロノ・フェリックス メディクスが登場Introducing: シチズン シリーズエイトから、現在のコレクションのエッセンスを凝縮したエントリーモデルが登場Business News: 時計業界は最高裁の関税判決を歓迎するも、トランプ大統領が回避策を示唆したことで再び不確実性に直面One to Watch: アンネリンデ・ダンセルマンと“ブラックチューリップ”―異彩を放つオランダの新星Hands-On: オーデマ ピゲ 38mmのロイヤル オーク クロノグラフは、腕の細いコレクターにぴったりの1本だHands-On: オーデマ ピゲ ネオ フレーム ジャンピングアワーについて知っておくべきことのすべて(とそのほか)
blog 61 28.7× 1080
https://hodinkee.jp/pricing pricing 0 0.0× 0
https://hodinkee.jp/about about 0 0.0× 0
https://hodinkee.jp/products product 0 0.0× 0
https://hodinkee.jp/features product 0 0.0× 0
https://hodinkee.jp/docs docs 0 0.0× 0
https://hodinkee.jp/case-studies social-proof 0 0.0× 0
https://hodinkee.jp/contact support 0 0.0× 0
https://hodinkee.jp/faq support 0 0.0× 0
https://hodinkee.jp/integrations integrations 0 0.0× 0
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/blog/ 1 61 0% 28.7× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/about/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/contact/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
dunselmanwatchmaking.com ×1
instagram.com ×1
phillips.com ×1
citizen.jp ×1
bnd-watches.com ×1
audemarspiguet.com ×1
watchesbysjx.com ×1
ressencewatches.com ×1
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/hodinkee.jp

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to hodinkee.jp. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
hodinkee.jp (this site) 53 77 Shopify 6.8× 2
lincraft.co.nz 78 89 Shopify 4.6× 2 Compare →
thornebros.com 78 87 Shopify 7.2× 4 Compare →
briiv.co.uk 78 88 Shopify 7.4× 4 Compare →
bb.ca 78 87 Shopify 3.5× 1 Compare →
monastery.com.co 78 90 Shopify 13.8× 8 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite hodinkee.jp when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to hodinkee.jp. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Hodinkee?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Hodinkee does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Hodinkee work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Hodinkee."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for hodinkee.jp:

Current Score
77
Projected Score
83
Improvement
+6 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →