hrc.org 69 C
🛡️ SEO 65 🤖 GEO 82 ⚡ Perf 47 🏗️ Arch 70

hrc.org — Global SEODiff Score 69/100

hrc.org
📊

hrc.org shows strong AI visibility with an ACRI of 68/100, outperforming 62% of indexed domains. In the infrastructure sector, hrc.org outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. A ghost ratio of 15% indicates a mixed rendering strategy where core content loads server-side but interactive sections rely on JavaScript. Token bloat registers at 7.6× — acceptable, but reducing inline scripts and redundant markup could yield measurable gains. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. Partial bot access means the domain is visible to some AI systems but not accessible to others — GPTBot remain blocked.

69
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (47) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add HSTS header → +2 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 3 snapshots
Mar 2 Mar 21
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than hrc.org?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)65 × 0.25 = 16.2
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)82 × 0.40 = 32.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)47 × 0.20 = 9.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)70 × 0.15 = 10.5
Weighted sum = 16.2 + 32.8 + 9.4 + 10.5
Global SEODiff Score = 69 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
60
Bot Access
avg 92
94
Rendering
avg 93
75
Structure
avg 35
42
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 1%
Rank #14217
+37 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 38%
Score 68/100

hrc.org punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why hrc.org ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat7.6×

Fastest improvements

  • Allow GPTBot in robots.txt so AI crawlers can access your pages (see Crawl Access).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

65/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

27 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

78 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 3
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 9
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.hrc.org/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Human Rights Campaign
  • ✓ og:description — Since 1980, we’ve led the way in fighting for LGBTQ+ equality and inclusion.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

82/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
hrc.org
61
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Blocked
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Blocked
Googlebot
Allowed
💡GPTBot is blocked. To appear in ChatGPT citations, add Allow: / under User-agent: GPTBot in your robots.txt.

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 15%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 75/100 — Good
Structured Elements 129 elements (129 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words755
Raw Density17.1%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

3/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

70
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
Medium
Blocklist Risk
Extractability70/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (50/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskMedium — 2 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

13%
🗑️ 87%
Useful Content (30.5 KB)Bloat (200.7 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio7.6× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context0% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage0 / 54 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Only 0% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 86.8% · SNR: 0.15 · Signal: 7809 / Noise: 51374 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of hrc.org and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
The Human Rights Campaign (HRC) is a civil rights organization dedicated to advancing LGBTQ+ equality through political advocacy, community engagement,
Target Audience
LGBTQ+ individuals, allies, political activists, voters, and organizations seeking to advance LGBTQ+ rights.
Pricing Model
Donations and membership fees to support the organization's work.
🏆 Competitive Moat
Large membership base and established political influence within the LGBTQ+ community.
📊 Content Depth
6/10
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of structured FAQ schema
• Limited SEO for specific programs and initiatives
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-01

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Servernginx
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1346 ms
Raw HTML Size231.2 KB
Visible Text Size30.5 KB

Performance & Speed

47/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1346 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

910
DOM nodes
231 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

70/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.hrc.org/sitemaps-2-sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✗ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

90
internal links
56
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 61/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for hrc.org
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/hrc.org" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=hrc.org" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 137 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
61
Single-page score
-19
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
42
Avg across 137 pages · Range 0–75
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 61, but internal pages average only 42 — a -19-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Topical Cohesion
23%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
23217
Avg Bloat
139.9×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://hrc.org/faq
HRC | Stand Visible, Stay Safe
pricing 75 10.1× 4334 💰 Pricing
https://hrc.org/about
HRC | About
about 64 41.1× 688
https://hrc.org/blog
HRC | News
blog 64 53.1× 669
https://www.hrc.org/resources/yeo/us-house-co03
HRC | US House CO03
blog 44 150.3× 138
https://www.hrc.org/resources/yeo/us-house-al01
HRC | US House AL01
blog 44 150.5× 138
https://www.hrc.org/resources/yeo/us-house-ca01
HRC | US House CA01
blog 44 150.5× 138
https://www.hrc.org/resources/yeo/us-house-ak01
HRC | US House AK01
blog 44 150.3× 138
https://www.hrc.org/resources/yeo/us-house-al02
HRC | US House AL02
blog 44 149.3× 138
https://www.hrc.org/resources/yeo/us-house-al03
HRC | US House AL03
blog 44 150.5× 138
https://www.hrc.org/resources/yeo/us-house-al05
HRC | US House AL05
blog 44 150.3× 138
https://www.hrc.org/resources/yeo/us-house-al07
HRC | US House AL07
blog 44 150.5× 138
https://www.hrc.org/resources/yeo/us-house-ar01
HRC | US House AR01
blog 44 149.6× 138
https://www.hrc.org/resources/yeo/us-house-ar02
HRC | US House AR02
blog 44 150.5× 138
https://www.hrc.org/resources/yeo/us-house-ar03
HRC | US House AR03
blog 44 149.5× 138
https://www.hrc.org/resources/yeo/us-house-ar04
HRC | US House AR04
blog 44 150.5× 138
https://www.hrc.org/resources/yeo/us-house-as01
HRC | US House AS01
blog 44 150.6× 138
https://www.hrc.org/resources/yeo/us-house-az01
HRC | US House AZ01
blog 44 150.5× 138
https://www.hrc.org/resources/yeo/us-house-ca29
HRC | US House CA29
blog 44 150.3× 138
https://www.hrc.org/resources/yeo/us-house-az08
HRC | US House AZ08
blog 44 150.3× 138
https://www.hrc.org/resources/yeo/us-house-fl27
HRC | US House FL27
blog 44 150.5× 138
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/resources/ 127 44 0% 150.1× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 64 0% 53.1× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/contact/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 75 0% 10.1× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 64 0% 41.1× High JS Bloat
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 137 pages
facebook.com ×130
youtube.com ×130
bsky.app ×130
linkedin.com ×130
instagram.com ×130
threads.net ×130
tiktok.com ×130
twitter.com ×123
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/hrc.org

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to hrc.org. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
hrc.org (this site) 61 68 Custom / Proprietary 7.6× 1
educationdirectory.com.au 86 87 Custom / Proprietary 5.1× 4 Compare →
melbourneschool.com 86 87 Custom / Proprietary 5.0× 4 Compare →
insuranceyet.com 86 87 Custom / Proprietary 4.9× 4 Compare →
pubsandclubs.com.au 86 87 Custom / Proprietary 4.9× 4 Compare →
kondela.hu 86 93 Custom / Proprietary 3.1× 4 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite hrc.org when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to hrc.org. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Allow GPTBot in robots.txt
High Impact ⏱ 2 min
GPTBot is blocked — your content cannot appear in ChatGPT citations. Add this to your robots.txt:
text
User-agent: GPTBot
Allow: /

User-agent: ChatGPT-User
Allow: /
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Hrc?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Hrc does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Hrc work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Hrc."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for hrc.org:

Current Score
68
Projected Score
82
Improvement
+14 pts
Allow GPTBot +8 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →