i-voce.jp 56 D
🛡️ SEO 31 🤖 GEO 65 ⚡ Perf 52 🏗️ Arch 81

i-voce.jp — Global SEODiff Score 56/100

i-voce.jp
📊

With a solid 80/100 ACRI, i-voce.jp is well-positioned for AI search — better than 94% of sites in the Radar. Within the infrastructure vertical, this places i-voce.jp above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. The bloated 20.4× token ratio highlights an urgent need to clean up non-content markup, scripts, and navigation clutter. Zero schema blocks puts this site at a disadvantage in knowledge graph and AI-answer pipelines that rely on explicit structured data. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

56
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Traditional SEO (31) has the most room for improvement.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (20×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 7 snapshots
Mar 7 Mar 21
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 21 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 20 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 20 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 18 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 16 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than i-voce.jp?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)31 × 0.25 = 7.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)65 × 0.40 = 26.0
⚡ Performance (20% weight)52 × 0.20 = 10.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)81 × 0.15 = 12.2
Weighted sum = 7.8 + 26.0 + 10.4 + 12.2
Global SEODiff Score = 56 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
87
Structure
avg 35
0
Schema
avg 9
80
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 7%
Rank #73032
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 6%
Score 80/100

i-voce.jp has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why i-voce.jp ranks here

Tech stackNuxt.js
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat20.4×

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

31/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

71 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

227 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 8
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 4
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://i-voce.jp/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — VOCE(ヴォーチェ)|美容メディア『VOCE』公式サイト
  • ✓ og:description — キレイになるって、面白い!美容メディアVOCE(ヴォーチェ)。最新コスメ情報や美容のプロ推薦のベストコスメ、クチコミなどが満載。 新作コスメカレンダーも必見!
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

65/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
i-voce.jp
56
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 87/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 111 elements (111 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words484
Raw Density22.9%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

56
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability56/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (75/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

4%
🗑️ 96%
Useful Content (18.9 KB)Bloat (366.1 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio20.4× — Heavy

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context90% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage100 / 111 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 385.0 KB, but only 18.9 KB is text. 4% useful / 96% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (20.4×) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 95.1% · SNR: 0.05 · Signal: 4842 / Noise: 93724 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of i-voce.jp and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
VOCE’s Best Cosmetics is a prestigious award for new beauty products, selected by a panel of over 50 beauty experts
Target Audience
Beauty editors, journalists, stylists, makeup artists, beauty influencers, and consumers interested in discovering new and highly-rated cosmetics.
Pricing Model
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
🏆 Competitive Moat
VOCE’s Best Cosmetics stands out due to its rigorous scoring system, transparent voting process (including individual scores and names), and independence from advertising, creating a ‘fair and honest’ award that prioritizes expert opinion and consumer feedback.
📊 Content Depth
8/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Template comparison pagesIntegration directory pages
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Thin landing pages for features
• No structured FAQ schema
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-04

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkNuxt.js
AI-Readiness Score80/100
Servernginx/1.28.2
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time506 ms
Raw HTML Size385.0 KB
Visible Text Size18.9 KB

Performance & Speed

52/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

506 ms
Acceptable — room for improvement

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1773
DOM nodes
385 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → s-maxage=600, stale-while-revalidate=86400, stale-if-error=3600
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

81/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://i-voce.jp/sitemaps/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

164
internal links
28
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 56/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for i-voce.jp
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/i-voce.jp" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=i-voce.jp" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 59 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
56
Single-page score
-29
Severe hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
28
Avg across 59 pages · Range 0–47
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 56, but internal pages average only 28 — a -29-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Topical Cohesion
2%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
7084
Avg Bloat
278.0×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://i-voce.jp/bestcosme/about/
VOCEベストコスメのトリセツ|美容メディア『VOCE』公式サイト
about 47 305.2× 75
https://i-voce.jp/faq
よくある質問|VOCE(ヴォーチェ)|美容メディア『VOCE』公式サイト
support 33 250.1× 72
https://i-voce.jp/faq/
よくある質問|VOCE(ヴォーチェ)|美容メディア『VOCE』公式サイト
support 33 250.4× 72
https://i-voce.jp/featured-series/stopthebadhabit/
「ダメ習慣、やめます」宣言!|美容メディアVOCE(ヴォーチェ)
product 33 322.1× 157
https://i-voce.jp/featured-series/eyebrow_trend/
“今どき眉”をモノにする!|美容メディアVOCE(ヴォーチェ)
product 33 323.8× 157
https://i-voce.jp/featured-series/ase_kaiketsu/
「汗、すごい」を解決したい!|美容メディアVOCE(ヴォーチェ)
product 33 322.4× 157
https://i-voce.jp/featured-series/skincare-bihadaryoku/
“美肌力”底上げスキンケア|美容メディアVOCE(ヴォーチェ)
product 33 317.7× 159
https://i-voce.jp/featured-series/creamcosmetics_beauty/
“クリーム美容”のすべて|美容メディアVOCE(ヴォーチェ)
product 33 311.9× 148
https://i-voce.jp/featured-series/ideaface_makeup/
“なりたい顔”に近づくメイク|美容メディアVOCE(ヴォーチェ)
product 33 313.3× 166
https://i-voce.jp/featured-series/overwhelmingmasterpiece_cosmetics/
“圧倒的名品”コスメ|美容メディアVOCE(ヴォーチェ)
product 33 316.4× 145
https://i-voce.jp/featured-series/summer_roughskin_cleansing/
“夏の肌荒れ”を解消するクレンジングの選び方|美容メディアVOCE(ヴォーチェ)
product 33 322.2× 145
https://i-voce.jp/featured-series/beautiful_from_the_brain/
“脳”から美しくなる|美容メディアVOCE(ヴォーチェ)
product 33 321.2× 147
https://i-voce.jp/featured-series/tireless-body/
「疲れない体」のつくり方|美容メディアVOCE(ヴォーチェ)
product 33 322.3× 151
https://i-voce.jp/featured-series/lookgood_autumnlips/
”似合う”で選ぶ【秋冬新色リップ】|美容メディアVOCE(ヴォーチェ)
product 33 320.7× 149
https://i-voce.jp/featured-series/cho-katsu/
「すごい腸活」レシピ|美容メディアVOCE(ヴォーチェ)
product 33 318.1× 159
https://i-voce.jp/featured-series/zintyu-tansyuku/
「人中短縮」を叶えるワザ教えます|美容メディアVOCE(ヴォーチェ)
product 33 321.7× 145
https://i-voce.jp/featured-series/solve_makeup_loss/
「メイク崩れ徹底解決」プロジェクト!|美容メディアVOCE(ヴォーチェ)
product 33 326.7× 147
https://i-voce.jp/featured-series/rethink_beauty/
「美容」から考え直す、当たり前|美容メディアVOCE(ヴォーチェ)
product 33 316.5× 159
https://i-voce.jp/featured-series/ookamichan-fukabori/
『彼とオオカミちゃんには騙されない』深掘り|美容メディアVOCE(ヴォーチェ)
product 33 321.9× 151
https://i-voce.jp/featured-series/bestmakeup_forme2021/
【なりたい顔】のつくり方2021|美容メディアVOCE(ヴォーチェ)
product 33 322.1× 153
Showing 20 of 59 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/featured-series/ 45 32 1% 322.0× Bot Blocked
/faq/ 2 33 1% 250.2× Bot Blocked
/about/ 2 26 0% 373.4× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/blog/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/ranking/ 1 30 1% 361.6× Bot Blocked
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/bestcosme/ 1 47 0% 305.2× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 59 pages
instagram.com ×51
youtube.com ×51
pinterest.jp ×51
tv-asahi.co.jp ×51
id-form.kodansha.co.jp ×51
withonline.jp ×51
vivi.tv ×51
aebs.or.jp ×51
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/i-voce.jp

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to i-voce.jp. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
i-voce.jp (this site) 56 80 Nuxt.js 20.4× 0
eptummers.nl 81 90 Next.js 15.7× 6 Compare →
editors.ca 81 90 WordPress 6.4× 1 Compare →
tvseriesfinale.com 81 90 WordPress 6.2× 1 Compare →
nordicwelfare.org 81 90 WordPress 4.8× 1 Compare →
tellter.com 81 90 WordPress 4.6× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite i-voce.jp when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to i-voce.jp. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "I-voce",
  "url": "https://i-voce.jp",
  "logo": "https://i-voce.jp/favicon.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "I-voce",
  "url": "https://i-voce.jp",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://i-voce.jp/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 4% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is I-voce?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what I-voce does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does I-voce work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with I-voce."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for i-voce.jp:

Current Score
80
Projected Score
98
Improvement
+18 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →