iltalehti.fi 33 F
🛡️ SEO 41 🤖 GEO 30 ⚡ Perf 68 🏗️ Arch 78

iltalehti.fi — Global SEODiff Score 33/100

iltalehti.fi
📊

AI crawlers face major barriers indexing iltalehti.fi, resulting in a low 15/100 ACRI rating that demands urgent attention. Within the infrastructure vertical, this places iltalehti.fi below the industry average of 57 —, indicating room for competitive improvement. While the majority of content is server-rendered, the 30% ghost ratio suggests some content remains hidden from static crawlers. The bloated 50.0× token ratio highlights an urgent need to clean up non-content markup, scripts, and navigation clutter. No structured data was detected, which means AI systems must infer all entities and relationships from raw HTML alone. Comprehensive AI crawler restrictions limit this domain's presence in the growing AI search ecosystem.

33
F — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Significant improvement opportunities. Start with AI Readiness (30).
🎯 Top Fix: Allow GPTBot + ClaudeBot in robots.txt → lift the score cap
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 15, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 30 snapshots
Feb 22 Mar 15
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than iltalehti.fi?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)41 × 0.25 = 10.2
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)30 × 0.40 = 12.0
⚡ Performance (20% weight)68 × 0.20 = 13.6
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)78 × 0.15 = 11.7
Weighted sum = 10.2 + 12.0 + 13.6 + 11.7
⚠️ Fatal multiplier: All major AI bots blocked → ×0.5
Global SEODiff Score = 33 (F)
🚫
Gatekeeper Rule: Score cannot exceed 15. Both GPTBot and ClaudeBot are blocked in robots.txt. No major AI assistant can cite this site. Allow at least one major AI crawler to lift the cap. See Bot Access →
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
20
Bot Access
avg 92
84
Rendering
avg 93
0
Structure
avg 35
0
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.1%
Rank #1367
+67 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 67%
Score 15/100

iltalehti.fi punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why iltalehti.fi ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat50×+

Fastest improvements

  • Allow GPTBot in robots.txt so AI crawlers can access your pages (see Crawl Access).
  • Allow ClaudeBot (many assistants rely on it) — blocking it often correlates with “AI invisibility.”
  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

41/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

43 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

156 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✗ Has <h2> headings — found 0
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.iltalehti.fi
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → fi
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Iltalehti | IL - Suomen suurin uutispalvelu
  • ✓ og:description — Uutiset, urheilu, viihde, talous, sää, terveys, ruoka, matkailu, autot ja tyyli – Iltalehti, kaikki tuoreet uutiset yhdestä osoitteesta kellon ympäri!
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

30/100 40 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
iltalehti.fi
14
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

👻
Shadow Content Detected: 30% of your page token budget is in non-rendered regions (JavaScript-dependent content that AI crawlers may not process). Combined with 130.4x token bloat, AI models are using most of their context window on noise instead of your real content. This dramatically increases hallucination probability — models fill the gap with made-up facts.
Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Blocked
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Blocked
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Blocked
Google-Extended
Blocked
Googlebot
Allowed
💡GPTBot is blocked. To appear in ChatGPT citations, add Allow: / under User-agent: GPTBot in your robots.txt.
💡ClaudeBot is blocked. To be cited by Claude, allow ClaudeBot in robots.txt.

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 30%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 0/100 — Poor
Structured Elements 0 elements (0 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words392
Raw Density0.0%
💡Low structure score (0/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 0 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

22
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
Critical
Blocklist Risk
Extractability22/100 — AI models can barely extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (80/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskCritical — 4 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

1%
🗑️ 99%
Useful Content (3.3 KB)Bloat (423.2 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio50×+ — Bloated

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context0% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage0 / 5 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 426.4 KB, but only 3.3 KB is text. 1% useful / 99% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (50×+) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.
💡Only 0% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 99.2% · SNR: 0.01 · Signal: 837 / Noise: 108330 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
ServerCloudFront
CDNcloudfront
HTTP Status200
Load Time523 ms
Raw HTML Size426.4 KB
Visible Text Size3.3 KB

Performance & Speed

68/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

523 ms
Acceptable — room for improvement

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

601
DOM nodes
426 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → public, max-age=10, stale-while-revalidate=5, stale-if-error=86400
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudfront

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

78/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.iltalehti.fi/sitemap/iltalehti.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✗ GPTBot allowed
  • ✗ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

62
internal links
10
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → fi
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 14/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for iltalehti.fi
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/iltalehti.fi" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=iltalehti.fi" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 359 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
14
Single-page score
+27
Subpages outperform homepage
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
41
Avg across 359 pages · Range 0–43
Topical Cohesion
9%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
56916
Avg Bloat
228.8×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.iltalehti.fi/digiuutiset/a/810f2dae-d64b-302f-904e-1169914fd179
Microsoft sijoitti nettimediayhtiöön
other 43 238.8× 166
https://www.iltalehti.fi/digiuutiset/a/f4f94b01-d7af-39c1-b187-59e96051aba0
Go.com heti kärkeen
other 43 244.1× 162
https://www.iltalehti.fi/digiuutiset/a/96c9b511-d4b5-3fa3-894d-b5cb02c3840b
Kuuntele web-sivut
other 43 247.7× 160
https://www.iltalehti.fi/digiuutiset/a/6251d30c-ef16-39c0-8e2f-9a6f98face28
Netscapen työntekijöistä 30% irtisanotaan
other 43 236.0× 168
https://www.iltalehti.fi/digiuutiset/a/405c9065-2755-3973-80bb-70634b0b5d4b
Nyt Lycos on myynnissä
other 43 241.2× 164
https://www.iltalehti.fi/digiuutiset/a/82f670cd-2d47-3342-abcb-a255c7b50d06
AMD K6-III haastaa Pentium III:n
other 43 239.0× 166
https://www.iltalehti.fi/digiuutiset/a/46233a8b-d0e8-3faf-b607-bec3806a2a16
Microsoft kerää salaa tietoa käyttäjistä?
other 43 234.9× 170
https://www.iltalehti.fi/digiuutiset/a/9b7cba8e-5a1f-37e5-b160-99bc012c7398
Compaq pistää AMD:n kannettaviin
other 43 236.2× 168
https://www.iltalehti.fi/digiuutiset/a/34c6f949-ee37-3603-82b2-fb273f76338f
Dow Jones saa internet-indeksin
other 43 241.5× 164
https://www.iltalehti.fi/digiuutiset/a/f2bb8d12-f216-3780-9792-3f027724009f
AMD K6-III haastaa Pentium III:n
other 43 239.0× 166
https://www.iltalehti.fi/digiuutiset/a/e04fda8a-eeaf-366e-8a51-0799d19a3d1d
Go.com heti kärkeen
other 43 244.1× 162
https://www.iltalehti.fi/digiuutiset/a/df3c9a8a-6111-32af-a7c3-3258d21c1de4
Caldera-oikeudenkäynti viivästyy
other 43 247.5× 160
https://www.iltalehti.fi/digiuutiset/a/e5d50953-a0ee-3ca6-a65b-9a05eaa09988
San Francisco nettitihein kaupunki
other 43 241.7× 164
https://www.iltalehti.fi/digiuutiset/a/98698048-0ce3-35a4-8bd1-718d54f8c2b1
Ääntä dvd:ltä
other 43 247.4× 160
https://www.iltalehti.fi/digiuutiset/a/4efa8002-0a70-3a6f-a58f-6e1c1c513918
Gates kirjoitti uuden kirjan
other 43 231.9× 171
https://www.iltalehti.fi/digiuutiset/a/c3d351bf-121c-3956-9e2e-5e5ce4537bcc
Domain-nimikiista pakotti sulkemaan Tähtien sota -saitin
other 43 236.6× 168
https://www.iltalehti.fi/digiuutiset/a/3b9ad566-bb94-30b9-9609-e320589069df
Linux tuntematon puolelle it-päättäjistä
other 43 241.6× 164
https://www.iltalehti.fi/digiuutiset/a/e22add26-e7b4-32fa-92a6-97791d55cc01
Microsoft avasi nettikaupan
other 43 244.6× 162
https://www.iltalehti.fi/digiuutiset/a/cf411bca-952c-3343-9616-23edeb0e4b54
Geyserville: kannettavan koko, pöytäkoneen teho
other 43 239.2× 166
https://www.iltalehti.fi/digiuutiset/a/703585d4-3d10-3c39-83ec-368996e96c59
Levy-yhtiö hyväksyi mp3-musiikin
other 43 244.2× 162
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/digiuutiset/ 343 43 1% 239.5× Bot Blocked
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/contact/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/api/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/careers/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/terms/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/help/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/about/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/solutions/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/privacy/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/blog/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 359 pages
instagram.com ×343
etua.fi ×343
twitter.com ×343
x.com ×343
kattokorko.fi ×343
facebook.com ×343
almamedia.fi ×343
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/iltalehti.fi

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to iltalehti.fi. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
iltalehti.fi (this site) 14 15 Custom / Proprietary 130.4× 0
webfixserver.nl 39 66 Custom / Proprietary 4.6× 0 Compare →
netlink.com.pl 39 63 Custom / Proprietary 6.7× 0 Compare →
mef.rs 39 68 Custom / Proprietary 11.5× 0 Compare →
flycricket.com 39 66 Custom / Proprietary 7.3× 0 Compare →
newyork.com 39 62 Custom / Proprietary 3.9× 0 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite iltalehti.fi when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to iltalehti.fi. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Iltalehti",
  "url": "https://iltalehti.fi",
  "logo": "https://assets.ilcdn.fi/apple-touch-icon.png",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Iltalehti",
  "url": "https://iltalehti.fi",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://iltalehti.fi/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Allow GPTBot in robots.txt
High Impact ⏱ 2 min
GPTBot is blocked — your content cannot appear in ChatGPT citations. Add this to your robots.txt:
text
User-agent: GPTBot
Allow: /

User-agent: ChatGPT-User
Allow: /
Allow ClaudeBot in robots.txt
Medium Impact ⏱ 2 min
ClaudeBot is restricted — Claude may not be able to cite your content. Many AI assistants rely on it.
text
User-agent: ClaudeBot
Allow: /

User-agent: anthropic-ai
Allow: /
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 0% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for iltalehti.fi:

Current Score
15
Projected Score
46
Improvement
+31 pts
Allow GPTBot +8 pts
Allow ClaudeBot +5 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →