ing.ro 69 C
🛡️ SEO 67 🤖 GEO 76 ⚡ Perf 47 🏗️ Arch 85

ing.ro — Global SEODiff Score 69/100

ing.ro
📊

ing.ro shows strong AI visibility with an ACRI of 80/100, outperforming 94% of indexed domains. Compared to other social sites (avg score: 57), ing.ro performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The rendering approach is hybrid, with a moderate ghost ratio of 15% — most content is accessible without JS, though some elements are client-rendered. A 11.0× bloat ratio is typical for sites in this tech tier — not wasteful, but streamlining could further boost extractability. The site includes 2 schema blocks, providing adequate structured data for basic entity recognition. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

69
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (47) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 15, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 3 snapshots
Mar 7 Mar 15
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 10 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than ing.ro?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)67 × 0.25 = 16.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)76 × 0.40 = 30.4
⚡ Performance (20% weight)47 × 0.20 = 9.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)85 × 0.15 = 12.8
Weighted sum = 16.8 + 30.4 + 9.4 + 12.8
Global SEODiff Score = 69 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
94
Rendering
avg 93
73
Structure
avg 35
44
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 5%
Rank #53296
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 6%
Score 80/100

ing.ro has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why ing.ro ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
Industrysocial
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage2 blocks
Token bloat11.0×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

67/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

29 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

121 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 5
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://ing.ro/persoane-fizice
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ro
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✗ og:title
  • ✗ og:description
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

76/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the social sector, martin-sad.ru (ACRI: 87) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
ing.ro
65
Your ACRI Score
87
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. martin-sad.ru has schema coverage of 63 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 15%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 73/100 — Good
Structured Elements 178 elements (178 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1129
Raw Density15.8%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks2 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
✅ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

65
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability65/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (50/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

9%
🗑️ 91%
Useful Content (28.7 KB)Bloat (286.8 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio11.0× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context10% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage3 / 30 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Only 10% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 90.9% · SNR: 0.10 · Signal: 7351 / Noise: 73429 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of ing.ro and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Protecția datelor personale | ING Romania provides a centralized platform for managing data privacy compliance across organizations, automating data mapping,
Target Audience
Data protection officers, compliance managers, legal teams, and IT professionals in organizations handling personal data, particularly within the financial services sector.
Pricing Model
Tiered subscription model: Free plan with limited features, Pro plan ($99/month), and Enterprise plan (custom pricing).
🔗 Integration Partners
SlackSalesforce
🛡️ Compliance Standards
GDPRSOC 2
🏆 Competitive Moat
AI-powered data mapping and automated compliance workflows, reducing manual effort and improving accuracy compared to traditional compliance solutions.
📊 Content Depth
8/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Data privacy compliance pageGDPR compliance pageSOC 2 compliance pageData mapping tool page
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Complex data mapping processes
• Manual data assessment for compliance
• Lack of visibility into data flows
• Difficulty in meeting evolving privacy regulations
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-03

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Server
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1481 ms
Raw HTML Size315.5 KB
Visible Text Size28.7 KB

Performance & Speed

47/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1481 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1133
DOM nodes
316 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → no-cache, no-store, must-revalidate
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

85/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://ing.ro/dam/ingro/sitemaps/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

160
internal links
15
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ro
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 65/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for ing.ro
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/ing.ro" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=ing.ro" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 77 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
65
Single-page score
-12
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
54
Avg across 77 pages · Range 0–90
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 65, but internal pages average only 54 — a -12-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Topical Cohesion
16%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
116443
Avg Bloat
97.6×
RAG Fractures [?]
2
⚠️
2 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 2 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://ing.ro/ing-in-romania/informatii-utile/protectie-date-personale
Protecția datelor personale | ING Romania
pricing 90 4.5× 19891 💰 Pricing
https://ing.ro/persoane-fizice/credite/ipotecar
Poti face o simulare cu calculatorul de credit ipotecar ING
pricing 75 11.4× 8711 💰 Pricing
https://ing.ro/persoane-fizice/economii-si-investitii/ing-economii-si-depozite-la-termen
Dobanda avantajoasa pentru conturi de economii ING.
pricing 72 19.5× 3824 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://ing.ro/companii-mari/solutiile-noastre
Solutiile noastre | ING Romania
pricing 72 19.8× 3087 💰 Pricing
https://ing.ro/persoane-fizice/carduri-si-conturi/cardurile-ing
Card ING de salariu si cumparaturi - lei sau euro
pricing 72 15.5× 4628 💰 Pricing
https://ing.ro/persoane-fizice/credite/ing-personal
Credit nevoi personale ING. Calculator credit ING Personal
pricing 72 16.2× 5048 💰 Pricing
https://ing.ro/persoane-fizice/info/actualizare-date
Ce presupune actualizarea datelor
pricing 72 17.0× 3724 💰 Pricing
https://ing.ro/imm/info/popriri pricing 67 28.5× 2103 💰 Pricing
https://ing.ro/persoane-fizice/credite/noua-casa
ING Noua Casa. Calculator Credit Noua Casa - ING Romania
pricing 67 29.5× 2341 💰 Pricing
https://ing.ro/ing-in-romania/informatii-utile/solutionare-litigii-cu-banca
Solutionare litigii cu banca | ING Romania
pricing 67 27.4× 2119 💰 Pricing
https://ing.ro/persoane-fizice/internet-banking/homebank
ING Home Bank - serviciul de internet banking gratuit
pricing 67 20.6× 3422 💰 Pricing
https://ing.ro/imm/solutii-de-finantare/linia-de-credit
Linie de credit ING | Finantare IMM | ING Romania
pricing 67 31.3× 2080 💰 Pricing
https://ing.ro/persoane-fizice/internet-banking/RoPay
RoPay
pricing 67 27.2× 2376 💰 Pricing
https://ing.ro/persoane-fizice/internet-banking/3dSecure
Cum confirmi o plata online cu cardul
pricing 67 25.7× 2584 💰 Pricing
https://ing.ro/imm/solutii-de-finantare/finantare-proiecte-sustenabile
Finanțare proiecte sustenabile | IMM | ING
pricing 67 36.6× 1813 💰 Pricing
https://ing.ro/persoane-fizice/credite/refinantare
Refinantare credite online ING sau alte banci
pricing 67 23.4× 4151 💰 Pricing
https://ing.ro/persoane-fizice/credite/credit-card
Card de cumparaturi si credit ING cu rate fara dobanda
pricing 67 20.6× 4440 💰 Pricing
https://ing.ro/imm/info/actualizare-date
Ce presupune actualizarea datelor
pricing 67 22.8× 2813 💰 Pricing
https://ing.ro/ing-in-romania/contact
Date de contact ING Bank Romania
pricing 64 45.5× 1349 💰 Pricing
https://ing.ro/persoane-fizice/asigurari/ing-home-protect
Asigurare locuință ING Home Protect
pricing 64 37.7× 1732 💰 Pricing
Showing 20 of 77 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/persoane-fizice/ 27 65 0% 61.7× High JS Bloat
/imm/ 21 58 0% 179.4× High JS Bloat
/ing-in-romania/ 11 65 0% 71.3× High JS Bloat
/companii-mari/ 4 61 0% 131.3× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/about/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/curs-valutar-pj/ 1 64 0% 102.4× High JS Bloat
/stare-servicii/ 1 44 0% 400.8× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/sustenabilitate/ 1 54 0% 186.4× High JS Bloat
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/ing.ro

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar social Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to ing.ro. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
ing.ro (this site) 65 80 Custom / Proprietary 11.0× 2
conrad.ba 81 86 Custom / Proprietary 3.4× 2 Compare →
sport-tec.de 82 86 Custom / Proprietary 3.0× 2 Compare →
laestokada.cl 82 86 Custom / Proprietary 3.6× 4 Compare →
hematoonkologia.pl 85 86 Custom / Proprietary 1.5× 2 Compare →
game.blogmura.com 85 87 Custom / Proprietary 3.0× 3 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite ing.ro when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to ing.ro. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Ing",
  "url": "https://ing.ro",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://ing.ro/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 9% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for ing.ro:

Current Score
80
Projected Score
89
Improvement
+9 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →