inschrijven.nl 45 D
🛡️ SEO 32 🤖 GEO 27 ⚡ Perf 74 🏗️ Arch 73

inschrijven.nl — Global SEODiff Score 45/100

inschrijven.nl
📊

With a solid 70/100 ACRI, inschrijven.nl is well-positioned for AI search — better than 67% of sites in the Radar. Client-side rendering pushes the ghost ratio to 50%, creating extractability risk for bots that do not execute scripts. A 50.0× token bloat ratio means crawlers must process significantly more tokens to reach the actual content — a drag on extraction efficiency. The complete absence of JSON-LD schema is a missed opportunity: even basic Organization markup would improve how AI crawlers understand this domain. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

45
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — AI Readiness (27) has the most room for improvement.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (246×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 7 snapshots
Feb 23 Mar 21
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than inschrijven.nl?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)32 × 0.25 = 8.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)27 × 0.40 = 10.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)74 × 0.20 = 14.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)73 × 0.15 = 10.9
Weighted sum = 8.0 + 10.8 + 14.8 + 10.9
Global SEODiff Score = 45 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
65
Rendering
avg 93
96
Structure
avg 35
0
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 31%
Rank #306641
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 33%
Score 70/100

inschrijven.nl has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why inschrijven.nl ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
Industry
RenderingCSR
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat50×+

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

32/100 25 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

📝 Title Tag

14 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

73 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✗ Has <h2> headings — found 0
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✗ Canonical tag present
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → nl
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Inschrijven.nl
  • ✓ og:description — On-line inschrijven voor actieve sportevenementen in Nederland en België
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

27/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

👻
Shadow Content Detected: 50% of your page token budget is in non-rendered regions (JavaScript-dependent content that AI crawlers may not process). Combined with 245.5x token bloat, AI models are using most of their context window on noise instead of your real content. This dramatically increases hallucination probability — models fill the gap with made-up facts.
Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 50%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Partially JS-Dependent
Rendering Type CSR
💡High ghost ratio means AI crawlers may miss content. Consider server-side rendering (SSR) or pre-rendering for critical pages.

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 96/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 10 elements (0 lists, 6 rows, 4 headers)
Total Words36
Raw Density27.8%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

45
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability45/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (55/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

1%
🗑️ 99%
Useful Content (386 B)Bloat (92.2 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio50×+ — Bloated

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context80% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage8 / 10 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 92.5 KB, but only 386 B is text. 1% useful / 99% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (50×+) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 99.6% · SNR: 0.00 · Signal: 96 / Noise: 23595 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Servernginx
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time719 ms
Raw HTML Size92.5 KB
Visible Text Size386 B

Performance & Speed

74/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

719 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

217
DOM nodes
92 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

73/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

16
internal links
3
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → nl
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 26/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for inschrijven.nl
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/inschrijven.nl" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=inschrijven.nl" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
26
Single-page score
-4
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
22
Avg across 10 pages · Range 22–22
Total Words
200
Avg Bloat
898.3×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://inschrijven.nl/pricing
Inschrijven.nl
pricing 22 898.3× 20
https://inschrijven.nl/about
Inschrijven.nl
about 22 898.3× 20
https://inschrijven.nl/features
Inschrijven.nl
product 22 898.3× 20
https://inschrijven.nl/products
Inschrijven.nl
product 22 898.3× 20
https://inschrijven.nl/docs
Inschrijven.nl
docs 22 898.3× 20
https://inschrijven.nl/blog
Inschrijven.nl
blog 22 898.3× 20
https://inschrijven.nl/case-studies
Inschrijven.nl
social-proof 22 898.3× 20
https://inschrijven.nl/faq
Inschrijven.nl
support 22 898.3× 20
https://inschrijven.nl/contact
Inschrijven.nl
support 22 898.3× 20
https://inschrijven.nl/integrations
Inschrijven.nl
integrations 22 898.3× 20
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/case-studies/ 1 22 1% 898.3× Bot Blocked
/faq/ 1 22 1% 898.3× Bot Blocked
/blog/ 1 22 1% 898.3× Bot Blocked
/about/ 1 22 1% 898.3× Bot Blocked
/products/ 1 22 1% 898.3× Bot Blocked
/features/ 1 22 1% 898.3× Bot Blocked
/docs/ 1 22 1% 898.3× Bot Blocked
/integrations/ 1 22 1% 898.3× Bot Blocked
/pricing/ 1 22 1% 898.3× Bot Blocked
/contact/ 1 22 1% 898.3× Bot Blocked
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
instagram.com ×10
threads.net ×10
nl.internet.nl ×10
nl.trustpilot.com ×10
facebook.com ×10
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/inschrijven.nl

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to inschrijven.nl. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
inschrijven.nl (this site) 26 70 Custom / Proprietary 245.5× 0
procvetok.by 36 61 Custom / Proprietary 8.3× 0 Compare →
classiccat.net 36 64 Custom / Proprietary 5.0× 0 Compare →
flightdec.com 36 68 Custom / Proprietary 22.0× 0 Compare →
forumgaming.fr 36 63 Custom / Proprietary 4.7× 0 Compare →
runmylease.com 36 63 Custom / Proprietary 10.3× 0 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite inschrijven.nl when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to inschrijven.nl. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Inschrijven",
  "url": "https://inschrijven.nl",
  "logo": "https://inschrijven.nl/img/apple-touch-icon.png",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Inschrijven",
  "url": "https://inschrijven.nl",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://inschrijven.nl/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Fix Client-Side Rendering
High Impact ⏱ 2–4 hrs
50% of your content is behind client-side JavaScript and may not be accessible to AI crawlers. Wrap critical content in server-rendered HTML using your framework.
html
<!-- Ensure main content is in the initial HTML response -->
<main id="content">
  <!-- Server-rendered content goes here -->
  <h1>Inschrijven</h1>
  <p>Your key content should render without JavaScript.</p>
  <!-- Move <script> tags to the bottom of <body> -->
</main>

<!-- In your framework config, enable SSR/prerendering: -->
<!-- your framework -->
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 0% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for inschrijven.nl:

Current Score
70
Projected Score
95
Improvement
+25 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Fix client-side rendering +10 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →