interfax.ru 70 B
🛡️ SEO 50 🤖 GEO 73 ⚡ Perf 74 🏗️ Arch 88

interfax.ru — Global SEODiff Score 70/100

interfax.ru
📊

interfax.ru scores 64/100 on the AI-Readiness Index, placing it in the middle tier of indexed domains — there is clear room for improvement. Within the social vertical, this places interfax.ru above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Content is delivered server-side, meaning bots and AI agents can parse the full page without executing JavaScript. With a 3.8× bloat ratio, the page delivers its content without excessive boilerplate, giving AI systems a clean extraction path. The complete absence of JSON-LD schema is a missed opportunity: even basic Organization markup would improve how AI crawlers understand this domain. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

70
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (50) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add Organization + WebSite JSON-LD → +5–8 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 20, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 30 snapshots
Feb 23 Mar 20
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
📈 Mar 20 ACRI +1 (42→43)
🔄 Mar 20 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 19 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 19 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 18 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than interfax.ru?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)50 × 0.25 = 12.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)73 × 0.40 = 29.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)74 × 0.20 = 14.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)88 × 0.15 = 13.2
Weighted sum = 12.5 + 29.2 + 14.8 + 13.2
Global SEODiff Score = 70 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
20
Structure
avg 35
0
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.5%
Rank #5210
+47 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 47%
Score 64/100

interfax.ru punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why interfax.ru ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
Industrysocial
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat3.8×

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

50/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

34 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

83 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 9
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.interfax.ru
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ru
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Интерфакс: новости
  • ✓ og:description — Новости информационного агентства Интерфакс
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

73/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the social sector, martin-sad.ru (ACRI: 87) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
interfax.ru
43
Your ACRI Score
87
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. martin-sad.ru has schema coverage of 63 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 20/100 — Low
Structured Elements 15 elements (13 lists, 2 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1238
Raw Density1.2%
💡Low structure score (20/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 13 list items, 2 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

51
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability51/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

26%
🗑️ 74%
Useful Content (19.4 KB)Bloat (54.1 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio3.8× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context91% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage20 / 22 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

30 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 73.7% · SNR: 0.36 · Signal: 4955 / Noise: 13856 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of interfax.ru and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Interfax provides news and information services to its clients.
Target Audience
Journalists, media professionals, business analysts, and researchers.
Pricing Model
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
🏆 Competitive Moat
Extensive news archive and established reputation in the Russian market.
📊 Content Depth
3/10
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-02-28

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
ServerQRATOR
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time891 ms
Raw HTML Size73.5 KB
Visible Text Size19.4 KB

Performance & Speed

74/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

891 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

646
DOM nodes
74 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

88/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.interfax.ru/SEO_SiteMapIndex.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

138
internal links
20
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ru
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 43/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for interfax.ru
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/interfax.ru" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=interfax.ru" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 229 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
43
Single-page score
+22
Subpages outperform homepage
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
65
Avg across 229 pages · Range 0–90
Total Words
118978
Avg Bloat
23.2×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.interfax.ru/business/1075059
Рынок акций РФ в пятницу поднялся к 2800п по индексу МосБиржи
other 90 9.0× 1719
https://www.interfax.ru/chronicle/ipoteka-v-rossii.html
Ипотека в России
other 85 9.9× 1512
https://www.interfax.ru/chronicle/byudzhet-rf.html
Бюджет РФ
other 85 7.9× 2027
https://www.interfax.ru/chronicle/inflyacziya-v-rossii.html
Инфляция в России
other 85 6.8× 2446
https://www.interfax.ru/chronicle/aviakatastrofa-v-aktau.html
Авиакатастрофа в Актау
other 85 7.6× 2296
https://www.interfax.ru/chronicle/stavka-cb-rf.html
Ставка ЦБ РФ
other 85 7.2× 2377
https://www.interfax.ru/chronicle/razliv-mazuta-v-kerchenskom-prolive.html
Разлив мазута в Керченском проливе
other 85 9.2× 1694
https://www.interfax.ru/chronicle/napadeniya-v-shkolah.html
Нападения в школах и вузах
other 85 9.1× 1690
https://www.interfax.ru/chronicle/olimpijskie-igry-2026.html
Олимпийские игры 2026
other 85 9.8× 1504
https://www.interfax.ru/world/1075092
Билл Клинтон заявил, что не общался с Эпштейном после раскрытия его преступлений
other 80 16.2× 846
https://www.interfax.ru/world/1075185
Посольство РФ рекомендовало российским гражданам покинуть Израиль
other 80 19.3× 662
https://www.interfax.ru/russia/1075110
Группировка "Восток" заявила о продвижении в глубину украинской обороны
other 80 17.0× 775
https://www.interfax.ru/russia/1075162
Военные РФ установили контроль над двумя селами в Запорожской и Харьковской областях
other 80 16.6× 823
https://www.interfax.ru/business/1075071
Рубль в последний торговый день зимы слегка поднялся в паре с юанем
other 80 10.3× 1348
https://www.interfax.ru/business/1075074
Сбор зерна в РФ в 2025 году составил 141,15 млн т, в том числе 91,1 млн т пшеницы
other 80 18.6× 628
https://www.interfax.ru/business/1075076
Добыча газа в РФ в морозном январе подскочила на 6,5% до 4-летнего максимума
other 80 18.4× 662
https://www.interfax.ru/business/1075068
Промпроизводство в РФ в январе снизилось на 0,8%, впервые с февраля 2025 года
other 80 15.0× 835
https://www.interfax.ru/business/1075064
Инфляция в РФ с 17 по 24 февраля составила 0,19%, в годовом выражении замедлилась до 5,8%
other 80 16.1× 757
https://www.interfax.ru/russia/1075251
Что произошло за день: суббота, 28 февраля
other 80 19.1× 669
https://www.interfax.ru/world/1075183
СМИ узнали, что целью атаки Израиля по Ирану была ликвидация Хаменеи и Пезешкиана
other 80 19.5× 663
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/world/ 106 70 0% 25.3× High JS Bloat
/russia/ 76 68 0% 27.4× High JS Bloat
/business/ 20 72 0% 22.0× High JS Bloat
/chronicle/ 10 83 0% 9.1× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/privacy/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/solutions/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/help/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/about/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/contact/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/api/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/blog/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 229 pages
scout.interfax.ru ×213
spark-interfax.ru ×213
finmarket.ru ×213
ifax.ru ×213
interfax-russia.ru ×213
e-disclosure.ru ×213
tp.interfax.ru ×213
twitter.com ×213
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/interfax.ru

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar social Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to interfax.ru. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
interfax.ru (this site) 43 64 Custom / Proprietary 3.8× 0
forum.kajgana.com 68 73 Custom / Proprietary 3.6× 1 Compare →
makeup.pl 68 80 Custom / Proprietary 4.2× 1 Compare →
clearimaging3.com 68 80 Custom / Proprietary 4.9× 1 Compare →
webdigitronix.com 68 75 Custom / Proprietary 2.0× 1 Compare →
activepages.com.au 68 77 Custom / Proprietary 2.8× 2 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite interfax.ru when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to interfax.ru. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Interfax",
  "url": "https://interfax.ru",
  "logo": "https://www.interfax.ru/favicon.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Interfax",
  "url": "https://interfax.ru",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://interfax.ru/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Interfax?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Interfax does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Interfax work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Interfax."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for interfax.ru:

Current Score
64
Projected Score
77
Improvement
+13 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →