invisionapp.com 56 D
🛡️ SEO 47 🤖 GEO 65 ⚡ Perf 41 🏗️ Arch 64

invisionapp.com — Global SEODiff Score 56/100

invisionapp.com
📊

At 76/100, the ACRI for invisionapp.com indicates strong fundamentals in AI extractability, surpassing the majority of indexed sites. In the infrastructure sector, invisionapp.com outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The low ghost ratio (10%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. The bloated 50.0× token ratio highlights an urgent need to clean up non-content markup, scripts, and navigation clutter. The complete absence of JSON-LD schema is a missed opportunity: even basic Organization markup would improve how AI crawlers understand this domain. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

56
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Performance (41) has the most room for improvement.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (105×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 19, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 3 snapshots
Mar 3 Mar 19
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
📈 Mar 14 ACRI +7 (50→57)
Does your site score higher than invisionapp.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)47 × 0.25 = 11.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)65 × 0.40 = 26.0
⚡ Performance (20% weight)41 × 0.20 = 8.2
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)64 × 0.15 = 9.6
Weighted sum = 11.8 + 26.0 + 8.2 + 9.6
Global SEODiff Score = 56 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
97
Rendering
avg 93
76
Structure
avg 35
0
Schema
avg 9
70
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 2%
Rank #18445
+16 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 17%
Score 76/100

invisionapp.com punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why invisionapp.com ranks here

Tech stackContentful
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat50×+

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

47/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

30 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

149 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 4
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 25
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://miro.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✅ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — AI Innovation Workspace | Miro
  • ✓ og:description — Speed up product development from ideation to launch. Align teams, break tool silos, and ship what customers need in one AI-powered visual platform.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

65/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
invisionapp.com
57
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 10%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 76/100 — Good
Structured Elements 332 elements (332 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1920
Raw Density17.3%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

48
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability48/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (85/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

1%
🗑️ 99%
Useful Content (13.3 KB)Bloat (1388.2 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio50×+ — Bloated

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context26% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage60 / 230 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 1401.5 KB, but only 13.3 KB is text. 1% useful / 99% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (50×+) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.
💡Only 26% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 99.1% · SNR: 0.01 · Signal: 3405 / Noise: 355391 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of invisionapp.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Miro is a collaborative online whiteboard platform that helps teams visualize ideas, plan projects, and streamline workflows. It offers a
Target Audience
Product managers, designers, marketers, strategists, and teams requiring collaborative visual planning and brainstorming.
Pricing Model
Multiple pricing tiers including Free, Starter, Business, and Enterprise, with options for monthly or annual billing.
🔗 Integration Partners
SlackJiraSalesforceZapier
🛡️ Compliance Standards
SOC 2
🏆 Competitive Moat
AI-powered features for accelerating workflows and providing intelligent suggestions, combined with a vast ecosystem of templates and integrations.
📊 Content Depth
8/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Integration directory pagesTemplate comparison pages
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Thin landing pages for features
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-01

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkContentful
AI-Readiness Score70/100
Server
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time832 ms
Raw HTML Size1401.5 KB
Visible Text Size13.3 KB

Performance & Speed

41/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

832 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

3990
DOM nodes
1402 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → private, max-age=0, must-revalidate
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

64/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

6
internal links
390
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 57/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for invisionapp.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/invisionapp.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=invisionapp.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 21 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
57
Single-page score
-1
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
56
Avg across 21 pages · Range 56–56
Total Words
24255
Avg Bloat
261.5×
RAG Fractures [?]
21
⚠️
21 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 21 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://invisionapp.com/api
AI Innovation Workspace | Miro
pricing 56 261.5× 1155 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://invisionapp.com/pricing
AI Innovation Workspace | Miro
pricing 56 261.5× 1155 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://invisionapp.com/guides
AI Innovation Workspace | Miro
pricing 56 261.5× 1155 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://invisionapp.com/about
AI Innovation Workspace | Miro
pricing 56 261.5× 1155 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://invisionapp.com/help
AI Innovation Workspace | Miro
pricing 56 261.5× 1155 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://invisionapp.com/resources
AI Innovation Workspace | Miro
pricing 56 261.5× 1155 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://invisionapp.com/solutions
AI Innovation Workspace | Miro
pricing 56 261.5× 1155 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://invisionapp.com/products
AI Innovation Workspace | Miro
pricing 56 261.5× 1155 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://invisionapp.com/features
AI Innovation Workspace | Miro
pricing 56 261.5× 1155 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://invisionapp.com/docs
AI Innovation Workspace | Miro
pricing 56 261.5× 1155 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://invisionapp.com/blog
AI Innovation Workspace | Miro
pricing 56 261.5× 1155 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://invisionapp.com/case-studies
AI Innovation Workspace | Miro
pricing 56 261.5× 1155 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://invisionapp.com/get-started
AI Innovation Workspace | Miro
pricing 56 261.5× 1155 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://invisionapp.com/demo
AI Innovation Workspace | Miro
pricing 56 261.5× 1155 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://invisionapp.com/contact
AI Innovation Workspace | Miro
pricing 56 261.5× 1155 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://invisionapp.com/integrations
AI Innovation Workspace | Miro
pricing 56 261.5× 1155 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://invisionapp.com/faq
AI Innovation Workspace | Miro
pricing 56 261.5× 1155 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://invisionapp.com/support
AI Innovation Workspace | Miro
pricing 56 261.5× 1155 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://invisionapp.com/trust
AI Innovation Workspace | Miro
pricing 56 261.5× 1155 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://invisionapp.com/security
AI Innovation Workspace | Miro
pricing 56 261.5× 1155 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
Showing 20 of 21 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/case-studies/ 1 56 0% 261.5× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 1 56 0% 261.5× High JS Bloat
/guides/ 1 56 0% 261.5× High JS Bloat
/get-started/ 1 56 0% 261.5× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 56 0% 261.5× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 56 0% 261.5× High JS Bloat
/api/ 1 56 0% 261.5× High JS Bloat
/solutions/ 1 56 0% 261.5× High JS Bloat
/demo/ 1 56 0% 261.5× High JS Bloat
/support/ 1 56 0% 261.5× High JS Bloat
/trust/ 1 56 0% 261.5× High JS Bloat
/resources/ 1 56 0% 261.5× High JS Bloat
/integrations/ 1 56 0% 261.5× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 56 0% 261.5× High JS Bloat
/security/ 1 56 0% 261.5× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 21 pages
instagram.com ×21
trust.miro.com ×21
community.miro.com ×21
canvas.miro.com ×21
play.google.com ×21
developers.miro.com ×21
youtube.com ×21
miro.com ×21
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/invisionapp.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to invisionapp.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
invisionapp.com (this site) 57 76 Contentful 105.4× 0
pylonport.bandainamcomusiclive.co.jp 82 86 Custom / Proprietary 2.8× 1 Compare →
voltas.com 82 88 Next.js 2.8× 1 Compare →
gifdb.com 82 88 WordPress 2.8× 1 Compare →
ciawifi.ru 82 86 Custom / Proprietary 2.5× 2 Compare →
anatel.gov.br 82 86 Custom / Proprietary 2.3× 2 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite invisionapp.com when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to invisionapp.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Invisionapp",
  "url": "https://invisionapp.com",
  "logo": "https://framerusercontent.com/images/6FBG66PBxjV2QFaDfIdUi5mi9A.png",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Invisionapp",
  "url": "https://invisionapp.com",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://invisionapp.com/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 0% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Invisionapp?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Invisionapp does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Invisionapp work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Invisionapp."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for invisionapp.com:

Current Score
76
Projected Score
94
Improvement
+18 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →