ipalfish.com 63 C
🛡️ SEO 42 🤖 GEO 75 ⚡ Perf 53 🏗️ Arch 77

ipalfish.com — Global SEODiff Score 63/100

ipalfish.com
📊

With a solid 73/100 ACRI, ipalfish.com is well-positioned for AI search — better than 75% of sites in the Radar. In the infrastructure sector, ipalfish.com outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. While the majority of content is server-rendered, the 30% ghost ratio suggests some content remains hidden from static crawlers. A 8.1× bloat ratio is typical for sites in this tech tier — not wasteful, but streamlining could further boost extractability. The site includes 2 schema blocks, providing adequate structured data for basic entity recognition. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

63
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (42) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 2 snapshots
Mar 11 Mar 21
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than ipalfish.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)42 × 0.25 = 10.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)75 × 0.40 = 30.0
⚡ Performance (20% weight)53 × 0.20 = 10.6
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)77 × 0.15 = 11.5
Weighted sum = 10.5 + 30.0 + 10.6 + 11.5
Global SEODiff Score = 63 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
84
Rendering
avg 93
81
Structure
avg 35
4
Schema
avg 9
55
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 23%
Rank #225657
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 25%
Score 73/100

ipalfish.com has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why ipalfish.com ranks here

Tech stackVue.js
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage2 blocks
Token bloat8.1×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

42/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

62 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

447 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 14
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.banyu.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → zh-CN
  • ✅ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — 伴鱼少儿英语 | 真人外教1对1 | 在线英语直播课
  • ✓ og:description — 伴鱼少儿英语,为3-12岁孩子提供真人外教1对1在线英语学习体验。我们通过三大维度(和谁练、练什么、怎么练)和四维教学体系(语言知识、语言能力、文化视野、素质培养),为孩子量身定制趣味互动课堂。每节课25分钟,固定外教,深度互动。立即注册,免费领取包含英语水平测试、25分钟1对1直播、学习报告和课程回放的试听课。
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

75/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
ipalfish.com
56
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

👻
Shadow Content Detected: 30% of your page token budget is in non-rendered regions (JavaScript-dependent content that AI crawlers may not process). Combined with 8.1x token bloat, AI models are using most of their context window on noise instead of your real content. This dramatically increases hallucination probability — models fill the gap with made-up facts.
Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 30%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 81/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 78 elements (78 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words394
Raw Density19.8%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks2 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

59
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability59/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

12%
🗑️ 88%
Useful Content (10.5 KB)Bloat (74.0 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio8.1× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context82% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage75 / 92 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 87.6% · SNR: 0.14 · Signal: 2676 / Noise: 18932 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of ipalfish.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
The company provides online educational programs for children, primarily focusing on English and mathematics, with a strong emphasis on ensuring
Target Audience
Parents of children aged 5-12, particularly those seeking supplemental education for their children's English and math skills, and concerned about the potential for hidden fees and refund difficulties in online education.
Pricing Model
Subscription-based, with tiered pricing for different programs (e.g., ‘伴鱼全能数学’ – full math curriculum). Likely offers a free trial and various subscription lengths (monthly, yearly).
🏆 Competitive Moat
Strong user retention rates (90%+) due to a focus on trust, transparency, and a robust refund policy, combined with a comprehensive curriculum and personalized learning approach. The emphasis on addressing parental concerns about hidden fees and refund issues creates a significant barrier to entry for competitors.
📊 Content Depth
7/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Integration directory pagesTemplate comparison pagesMultiple articles focusing on refund policies and pricing
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of structured FAQ schema
• Thin landing pages for features
• Parental concerns about hidden fees and refund policies
• Potential conflict between the program and school curriculum
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-11

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkVue.js
AI-Readiness Score55/100
Serveropenresty
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1858 ms
Raw HTML Size84.4 KB
Visible Text Size10.5 KB

Performance & Speed

53/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1858 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

885
DOM nodes
84 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

77/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

48
internal links
11
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → zh-CN
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 56/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for ipalfish.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/ipalfish.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=ipalfish.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
56
Single-page score
-51
Severe hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
5
Avg across 10 pages · Range 0–50
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 56, but internal pages average only 5 — a -51-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Total Words
168
Avg Bloat
7.5×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://ipalfish.com/blog
伴鱼在线 - 伴鱼官方博客
blog 50 74.6× 168
https://ipalfish.com/pricing pricing 0 0.0× 0
https://ipalfish.com/about about 0 0.0× 0
https://ipalfish.com/products product 0 0.0× 0
https://ipalfish.com/features product 0 0.0× 0
https://ipalfish.com/docs docs 0 0.0× 0
https://ipalfish.com/case-studies social-proof 0 0.0× 0
https://ipalfish.com/contact support 0 0.0× 0
https://ipalfish.com/faq support 0 0.0× 0
https://ipalfish.com/integrations integrations 0 0.0× 0
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/blog/ 1 50 0% 74.6× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/contact/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
ipalfish.zhiye.com ×1
banyu.com ×1
beian.miit.gov.cn ×1
palfish.com ×1
blog.banyu.com ×1
beian.gov.cn ×1
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/ipalfish.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to ipalfish.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
ipalfish.com (this site) 56 73 Vue.js 8.1× 2
casablancaparis.com 81 89 Shopify 6.7× 3 Compare →
editors.ca 81 90 WordPress 6.4× 1 Compare →
newbalance.ch 81 88 Next.js 6.3× 3 Compare →
tvseriesfinale.com 81 90 WordPress 6.2× 1 Compare →
puuilo.fi 81 87 Express 4.1× 2 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite ipalfish.com when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to ipalfish.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Ipalfish",
  "url": "https://ipalfish.com",
  "logo": "https://s04.cdn.ipalfish.com/static/omp-upload-1642059880751-favicon.png",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Ipalfish",
  "url": "https://ipalfish.com",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://ipalfish.com/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Ipalfish?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Ipalfish does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Ipalfish work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Ipalfish."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for ipalfish.com:

Current Score
73
Projected Score
89
Improvement
+16 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →