jenkins.io 62 C
🛡️ SEO 47 🤖 GEO 62 ⚡ Perf 74 🏗️ Arch 71

jenkins.io — Global SEODiff Score 62/100

jenkins.io
📊

The AI-Readiness profile for jenkins.io is strong: an ACRI of 66/100 places it ahead of 57% of domains in the index. Within the developer vertical, this places jenkins.io above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. A 6.4× bloat ratio is typical for sites in this tech tier — not wasteful, but streamlining could further boost extractability. Zero schema blocks puts this site at a disadvantage in knowledge graph and AI-answer pipelines that rely on explicit structured data. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

62
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (47) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add Organization + WebSite JSON-LD → +5–8 pts
⚠️ Crawl Blocked: Fetch failed (network timeout / connection error)
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 15, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 28 snapshots
Feb 22 Mar 15
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than jenkins.io?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)47 × 0.25 = 11.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)62 × 0.40 = 24.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)74 × 0.20 = 14.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)71 × 0.15 = 10.7
Weighted sum = 11.8 + 24.8 + 14.8 + 10.7
Global SEODiff Score = 62 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
30
Structure
avg 35
0
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.9%
Rank #9161
+43 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 43%
Score 66/100

jenkins.io punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why jenkins.io ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
Industrydeveloper
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat6.4×

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…

⚠️ Crawl Failed: Anti-Bot Protection Detected

Fetch failed (network timeout / connection error)

The scores below may not reflect actual site quality. The crawler received a challenge page instead of real content.

🛡️

Traditional SEO

47/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

7 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

137 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 8
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https:/www.jenkins.io/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Jenkins
  • ✓ og:description — Jenkins – an open source automation server which enables developers around the world to reliably build, test, and deploy their software
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

62/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the developer sector, hikkoshizamurai.jp (ACRI: 88) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
jenkins.io
27
Your ACRI Score
88
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. hikkoshizamurai.jp has schema coverage of 5 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 30/100 — Low
Structured Elements 32 elements (32 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1184
Raw Density2.7%
💡Low structure score (30/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 32 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

49
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability49/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

15%
🗑️ 85%
Useful Content (9.3 KB)Bloat (50.5 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio6.4× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context70% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage19 / 27 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 84.4% · SNR: 0.18 · Signal: 2387 / Noise: 12929 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of jenkins.io and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Jenkins provides a cloud-based continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) platform for automating software development workflows, particularly for distributed teams.
Target Audience
Software developers, DevOps engineers, system administrators, CI/CD practitioners, and open-source contributors.
Pricing Model
Open-source with commercial support and enterprise options available. Pricing is not explicitly stated, but support and enterprise tiers are offered.
🔗 Integration Partners
SlackGitHubGitLabJiraJenkinsBitbucketAzureAWS
🛡️ Compliance Standards
SOC 2
🏆 Competitive Moat
Jenkins’ extensive plugin ecosystem, large community support, and long history as a leading CI/CD solution provide a significant competitive advantage.
📊 Content Depth
8/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Integration directory pagesTemplate comparison pagesEvent announcements (FOSDEM, Jenkins World)Google Summer of Code announcements
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of structured FAQ schema
• Thin landing pages for features
• Complexity of Java settings tuning
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-02-28

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Server
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time502 ms
Raw HTML Size59.8 KB
Visible Text Size9.3 KB

Performance & Speed

74/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

502 ms
Acceptable — room for improvement

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

454
DOM nodes
60 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → max-age=3600, public
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

71/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

38
internal links
28
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site is currently blocking AI crawlers. Unblock them and rescan to earn your AI-Verified badge.

AI-Verified badge for jenkins.io
Unverified — crawl access is blocked
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/jenkins.io" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=jenkins.io" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 166 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
27
Single-page score
+42
Subpages outperform homepage
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
69
Avg across 166 pages · Range 0–82
Topical Cohesion
4%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
168618
Avg Bloat
6.5×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.jenkins.io/doc/book/system-administration/FIPS-140/
FIPS-140
pricing 82 5.0× 680 💰 Pricing
https://www.jenkins.io/doc/book/scaling/scaling-jenkins-on-kubernetes/
Scaling Jenkins on Kubernetes
pricing 82 3.3× 1656 💰 Pricing
https://www.jenkins.io/doc/book/security/access-control/
Access Control
pricing 82 3.9× 1006 💰 Pricing
https://www.jenkins.io/doc/book/scaling/architecting-for-manageability/
Architecting for Manageability
docs 82 3.4× 1700
https://www.jenkins.io/doc/book/platform-information/upgrade-java-to-11/
Upgrade to Java 11
pricing 82 5.0× 719 💰 Pricing
https://www.jenkins.io/doc/book/security/user-content/
Rendering User Content
docs 82 4.1× 888
https://www.jenkins.io/doc/book/security/securing-org-folders-and-multibranch-pipelines/
Securing SCM credentials for Organization Folders and Multibranch Pipelines
pricing 82 3.7× 1146 💰 Pricing
https://www.jenkins.io/doc/book/system-administration/reverse-proxy-configuration-with-jenkins/reverse-proxy-configuration-iptables/
Reverse proxy - iptables
docs 82 3.8× 1272
https://www.jenkins.io/doc/book/system-administration/reverse-proxy-configuration-with-jenkins/reverse-proxy-configuration-haproxy/
Reverse proxy - HAProxy
pricing 82 4.1× 1304 💰 Pricing
https://www.jenkins.io/doc/book/using/using-jmeter-with-jenkins/
Using JMeter with Jenkins
pricing 82 4.0× 1244 💰 Pricing
https://www.jenkins.io/doc/book/managing/system-properties/
Jenkins Features Controlled with System Properties
pricing 82 3.8× 8722 💰 Pricing
https://www.jenkins.io/doc/book/managing/spawning-processes/
Spawning Processes From Build
docs 82 3.8× 1038
https://www.jenkins.io/doc/book/pipeline/cps-method-mismatches/
Pipeline CPS Method Mismatches
docs 82 3.9× 1487
https://www.jenkins.io/doc/book/managing/plugins/
Managing Plugins
pricing 82 3.0× 2849 💰 Pricing
https://www.jenkins.io/doc/book/managing/system-configuration/
Configuring the System
pricing 82 4.9× 860 💰 Pricing
https://www.jenkins.io/doc/book/managing/nodes/
Managing Nodes
docs 82 3.8× 1422
https://www.jenkins.io/doc/book/managing/script-console/
Script Console
pricing 82 3.8× 3105 💰 Pricing
https://www.jenkins.io/doc/book/managing/script-approval/
In-process Script Approval
pricing 82 4.3× 1004 💰 Pricing
https://www.jenkins.io/doc/book/managing/cli/
Jenkins CLI
pricing 82 3.0× 2103 💰 Pricing
https://www.jenkins.io/doc/book/managing/casc/
Configuration as Code
pricing 82 3.2× 1841 💰 Pricing
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/doc/ 156 73 0% 6.8× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/contact/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/blog/ 1 77 0% 8.1× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/jenkins.io

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar developer Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to jenkins.io. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
jenkins.io (this site) 27 66 Custom / Proprietary 6.4× 0
elfapp.net 52 71 Custom / Proprietary 3.9× 0 Compare →
discuss.scientific-python.org 52 71 Custom / Proprietary 4.5× 1 Compare →
nodeinfo.diaspora.software 52 72 Custom / Proprietary 2.4× 0 Compare →
forum.enjayworld.com 52 70 Custom / Proprietary 3.8× 1 Compare →
medicare.pl 52 68 Custom / Proprietary 10.9× 0 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite jenkins.io when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to jenkins.io. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Jenkins",
  "url": "https://jenkins.io",
  "logo": "https://jenkins.io/favicon.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Jenkins",
  "url": "https://jenkins.io",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://jenkins.io/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Jenkins?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Jenkins does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Jenkins work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Jenkins."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for jenkins.io:

Current Score
66
Projected Score
82
Improvement
+16 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →