jstor.org 64 C
🛡️ SEO 43 🤖 GEO 70 ⚡ Perf 80 🏗️ Arch 64

jstor.org — Global SEODiff Score 64/100

jstor.org
📊

With a solid 66/100 ACRI, jstor.org is well-positioned for AI search — better than 57% of sites in the Radar. Within the developer vertical, this places jstor.org above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The low ghost ratio (5%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. A tight 4.1× token bloat ratio reflects disciplined markup: minimal noise between the crawler and the content it needs. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. Some AI crawlers are permitted while others are blocked — a mixed robots.txt policy that limits visibility in certain AI ecosystems.

64
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (43) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add HSTS header → +2 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 20, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 28 snapshots
Feb 22 Mar 20
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than jstor.org?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)43 × 0.25 = 10.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)70 × 0.40 = 28.0
⚡ Performance (20% weight)80 × 0.20 = 16.0
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)64 × 0.15 = 9.6
Weighted sum = 10.8 + 28.0 + 16.0 + 9.6
Global SEODiff Score = 64 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
80
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
49
Structure
avg 35
2
Schema
avg 9
70
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.1%
Rank #1151
+43 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 43%
Score 66/100

jstor.org punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why jstor.org ranks here

Tech stackNext.js
Industrydeveloper
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat4.1×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

43/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

10 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

76 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✗ Has <h2> headings — found 0
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.jstor.org/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✗ og:title
  • ✗ og:description
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

70/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the developer sector, hikkoshizamurai.jp (ACRI: 88) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
jstor.org
50
Your ACRI Score
88
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. hikkoshizamurai.jp has schema coverage of 5 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Blocked
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 49/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 19 elements (19 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words264
Raw Density7.2%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

1/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

60
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
Low
Blocklist Risk
Extractability60/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (10/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskLow — 1 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

24%
🗑️ 76%
Useful Content (9.9 KB)Bloat (30.9 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio4.1× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context76% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage19 / 25 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

23 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 75.8% · SNR: 0.32 · Signal: 2533 / Noise: 7917 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of jstor.org and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
Target Audience
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
Pricing Model
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
🏆 Competitive Moat
SEMANTIC VOID
📊 Content Depth
1/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
LIST OF CONTRIBUTORSTABLE OF CONTENTSFIGURESTABLESGLOSSARYBIOGRAPHIESINDEX
⚡ Key Pain Points
• No core offering described
• No target audience specified
• No pricing model mentioned
• No competitive moat identified
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-02-27

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkNext.js
AI-Readiness Score70/100
Serverenvoy
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time847 ms
Raw HTML Size40.8 KB
Visible Text Size9.9 KB

Performance & Speed

80/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

847 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

212
DOM nodes
41 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

64/100 15 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.jstor.org/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

0
internal links
0
external links
Very few internal links — crawlers may miss important pages

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 50/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for jstor.org
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/jstor.org" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=jstor.org" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 27 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
50
Single-page score
-29
Severe hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
22
Avg across 27 pages · Range 0–44
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 50, but internal pages average only 22 — a -29-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Total Words
604
Avg Bloat
98.7×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.jstor.org/content/oa_book_edited/j.ctt183q3k6
Tropical Forests Of Oceania: Anthropological Perspectives on JSTOR
other 44 30.3× 153
https://www.jstor.org/content/oa_book_edited/j.ctt24hc84
Political Parties in the Pacific Islands on JSTOR
other 44 35.1× 142
https://www.jstor.org/content/oa_chapter_edited/j.ctv3142txr.9
Coronavirus: autodefensa de la propia Tierra autodefensa de la propia Tierra from Poderes, privilegios, resistencias y alternativas: lectura crítica en tiempos de post-pandemia on JSTOR
other 31 104.5× 25
https://www.jstor.org/content/oa_chapter_edited/jj.36897601.4
Notes on contributors from Reframing Failure in Digital Scholarship on JSTOR
other 31 237.7× 11
https://www.jstor.org/content/oa_chapter_edited/j.ctvt6rm3d.4
El desarrollo sostenible, el desafío que nos espera from Ensayos para un modelo de desarrollo sostenible: un cambio estructural on JSTOR
other 31 135.2× 21
https://www.jstor.org/content/oa_chapter_monograph/jj.6605389.6
1 Collaborations in the Heartland of the Haudenosaunee: Determining an Interpretive Location Determining an Interpretive Location from The Urgency of Indigenous Values on JSTOR
other 31 121.0× 24
https://www.jstor.org/content/oa_chapter_edited/j.ctvnp0k5d.20
OS DESAFIOS IMPOSTOS PELA SOBREVIVÊNCIA from Epistemologías del Sur: epistemologias do Sul on JSTOR
other 31 185.6× 14
https://www.jstor.org/content/oa_chapter_monograph/j.ctv1p2gmb4.35
GEORGE HARTSHORN HODGES from Kansas Governors on JSTOR
other 31 327.2× 8
https://www.jstor.org/content/oa_chapter_edited/j.ctv1fxdh9.5
Multikulturalität und Demokratie.: Zuwanderung und die konzeptionellen sowie praktischen Probleme der politischen Integration Zuwanderung und die konzeptionellen sowie praktischen Probleme der politischen Integration from Multikulturalität in Europa: Teilhabe in der Einwanderungsgesellschaft on JSTOR
other 31 82.0× 33
https://www.jstor.org/content/oa_chapter_edited/jj.36233695.8
TRØNDELAGSOVNEN – EN STUDIE BASERT PÅ MATERIELLE LEVNINGER ETTER JERNFRAMSTILLING I MIDT-NORGE from Ovnstypologi og ovnskronologi i den nordiske jernvinna: Jernvinna i Oppland on JSTOR
other 31 107.8× 25
https://www.jstor.org/content/oa_chapter_monograph/j.ctvbkk1jb.17
Appendix E: Gender-specific Transition Patterns Gender-specific Transition Patterns from Smooth Path or Long and Winding Road?: How Institutions Shape the Transition from Higher Education to Work on JSTOR
other 31 95.2× 28
https://www.jstor.org/content/oa_chapter_monograph/j.ctv1p3xjx6.15
NOTES from Class and Community in Frontier Colorado on JSTOR
other 31 261.0× 10
https://www.jstor.org/content/oa_chapter_edited/j.ctt5vjsk8.26
Index from A People Passing Rude: British Responses to Russian Culture on JSTOR
other 31 200.7× 13
https://www.jstor.org/content/oa_chapter_monograph/j.ctt4cgn75.95
The City So Nice They Named It Twice from Poets On Place on JSTOR
other 31 187.8× 14
https://www.jstor.org/content/oa_chapter_edited/j.ctt46nrkh.2
Table of Contents from Usable Pasts: Traditions and Group Expressions in North America on JSTOR
other 31 174.6× 15
https://www.jstor.org/content/oa_chapter_monograph/10.7249/j.ctt14bs4s2.7
Acknowledgments from Evaluation of the SB 1041 Reforms to California’s CalWORKs Program: Background and Study Design on JSTOR
other 31 146.9× 18
https://www.jstor.org/content/oa_chapter_monograph/j.ctt46n0t1.5
1 Corporate Communities, Governance and Control from Decline of the Corporate Community: Network Dynamics of the Dutch Business Elite on JSTOR
other 31 138.1× 21
https://www.jstor.org/content/oa_chapter_monograph/jj.27608536.9
THE SECOND BALLAD OF HØGNI OR THE BALLAD OF ALDRIAS (ANNAR HØGNA TÁTTUR OR ALDRIAS TÁTTUR) from The Völsung Ballads from the Faroe Islands in English Translation on JSTOR
other 31 95.5× 29
https://jstor.org/pricing pricing 0 0.0× 0
https://jstor.org/about about 0 0.0× 0
Showing 20 of 27 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/content/ 18 32 1% 148.1× Bot Blocked
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/about/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/blog/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/jstor.org

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar developer Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to jstor.org. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
jstor.org (this site) 50 66 Next.js 4.1× 1
kadokawa.com.tw 75 81 Next.js 4.9× 1 Compare →
cpaddict.com 75 88 Next.js 9.1× 2 Compare →
dalbe.fr 75 82 Next.js 9.2× 2 Compare →
zyros.com 75 82 Laravel 4.2× 1 Compare →
kulina.hu 75 86 Custom / Proprietary 3.4× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite jstor.org when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🎭

Bait & Switch Delta

B 15 PAGES

Compares your homepage rendering quality with inner pages. A high drift score means AI crawlers see a polished homepage but degraded inner content — the "bait & switch" that erodes trust.

31
Homepage ACRI
31
Inner Avg ACRI
0
ACRI Delta
60%
Homepage Ghost
60%
Inner Avg Ghost
15
Drift Score [?]
Worst Inner Pages
31 60% other https://www.jstor.org/content/oa_chapter_edited/j.ctv3142txr.9
31 60% other https://www.jstor.org/content/oa_chapter_edited/jj.36897601.4
31 60% other https://www.jstor.org/content/oa_chapter_edited/j.ctvt6rm3d.4
🛡️

E-E-A-T Trust Signals

F 10/100

Trust indicators extracted from surface pages. These signals help AI systems verify your site's Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness.

Physical Address
Phone Number
Email Contact
About Page
Contact Page
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Named Leadership
Named leadership: Leonardo Boff, Fernando Carmona Alert, Teresa Cruz e Silva
🔗

Citation Profile

0 DOMAINS

Outbound citation patterns across surface-crawled pages. Sites that cite diverse, authoritative sources signal higher E-E-A-T to AI systems.

0
Total Links
0
Unique Domains
0.0
Avg/Page
0%
Diversity
🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to jstor.org. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Jstor",
  "url": "https://jstor.org",
  "logo": "https://www.jstor.org/assets/global_20251201T215504/build/images/favicons/android-chrome-192x192.png",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Jstor?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Jstor does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Jstor work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Jstor."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for jstor.org:

Current Score
66
Projected Score
78
Improvement
+12 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →