king.edu 69 C
🛡️ SEO 51 🤖 GEO 84 ⚡ Perf 52 🏗️ Arch 83

king.edu — Global SEODiff Score 69/100

king.edu
📊

With an ACRI of 87/100, king.edu stands out as one of the highest-performing sites in AI search visibility, outranking 99% of its peers. Within the education vertical, this places king.edu above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. The token bloat ratio sits at a lean 3.8×, meaning the ratio of code to visible content is efficient — crawlers spend their token budget on actual information. Minimal structured data (1 block) limits the site's ability to communicate entity relationships to AI systems. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

69
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (51) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add HSTS header → +2 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 15, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 2 snapshots
Mar 7 Mar 15
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 15 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than king.edu?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)51 × 0.25 = 12.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)84 × 0.40 = 33.6
⚡ Performance (20% weight)52 × 0.20 = 10.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)83 × 0.15 = 12.4
Weighted sum = 12.8 + 33.6 + 10.4 + 12.4
Global SEODiff Score = 69 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
84
Structure
avg 35
42
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 30%
Rank #299224
-28 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 1%
Score 87/100

king.edu ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 30%) than in AI search (Top 1%). This is the 'Visibility Gap' pattern — implementing the recommendations above can help close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why king.edu ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
Industryeducation
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat3.8×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

51/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

65 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

141 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 1
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.king.edu/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — King University | Christian University in Tennessee | Bristol, TN
  • ✓ og:description — Founded in 1867, King University is a Presbyterian-affiliated Christian college dedicated to the integration of rigorous academics and faith.
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

84/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the education sector, rndirectors.com (ACRI: 85) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
king.edu
79
Your ACRI Score
85
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. rndirectors.com has schema coverage of 4 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 84/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 691 elements (691 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words3258
Raw Density21.2%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

3/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

81
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability81/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (50/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

26%
🗑️ 74%
Useful Content (82.7 KB)Bloat (233.9 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio3.8× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage104 / 104 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

30 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 73.9% · SNR: 0.35 · Signal: 21174 / Noise: 59880 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of king.edu and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Christian college education
Target Audience
High school graduates seeking Christian education
Pricing Model
Not specified
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-02-26

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time668 ms
Raw HTML Size316.6 KB
Visible Text Size82.7 KB

Performance & Speed

52/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

668 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

2980
DOM nodes
317 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → max-age=600, must-revalidate
  • ✓ CDN cache status → DYNAMIC
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

83/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.king.edu/sitemap_index.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

601
internal links
20
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 79/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for king.edu
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/king.edu" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=king.edu" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 601 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
79
Single-page score
-25
Severe hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
54
Avg across 601 pages · Range 0–85
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 79, but internal pages average only 54 — a -25-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Topical Cohesion
12%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
306139
Avg Bloat
833.6×
RAG Fractures [?]
2
⚠️
2 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 2 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.king.edu/student-life/students-changing-lives/
Students in Service | King University
pricing 85 7.2× 19924 💰 Pricing
https://www.king.edu/about/office-of-the-president/honorary-degrees/
Honorary Degrees | King University
pricing 75 19.9× 6451 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.king.edu/about/office-of-the-president/past-presidents/
Past Presidents | King University
pricing 75 19.3× 6363 💰 Pricing
https://www.king.edu/events/event-cancelations-and-postponements/
COVID-19 (COVID-19) | King University's Proactive Measures
pricing 75 11.2× 12432 💰 Pricing
https://www.king.edu/about/our-history/
Our History | King University
pricing 70 34.0× 3412 💰 Pricing
https://www.king.edu/about/offices/security-and-safety/security-guidelines/camp-participant-waiver/
Camp Participant Waiver | King University
pricing 70 28.6× 2408 💰 Pricing
https://www.king.edu/about/offices/advancement/alumni/published-authors/
Published Authors | King University
pricing 70 33.3× 3676 💰 Pricing
https://www.king.edu/student-life/student-housing/faq/
FAQ | King University
pricing 70 22.6× 5260 💰 Pricing
https://www.king.edu/student-life/
Student Life | King University
pricing 70 26.7× 2624 💰 Pricing
https://www.king.edu/about/consumer-information/ferpa/
Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) | King University
pricing 67 125.8× 901 💰 Pricing
https://www.king.edu/about/consumer-information/file-sharing-and-copyright-infringement/
File Sharing and Copyright Infringement | King University
pricing 67 162.4× 695 💰 Pricing
https://www.king.edu/about/offices/registrar/military/helpful-links-forms/
Helpful Links/Forms | King University
pricing 67 144.3× 784 💰 Pricing
https://www.king.edu/about/distinctively-king/
Distinctively King | King University
pricing 67 65.6× 983 💰 Pricing
https://www.king.edu/about/offices/registrar/academic-programs-and-cip-codes/
Academic Programs and CIP Codes | King University
pricing 67 221.4× 516 💰 Pricing
https://www.king.edu/about/offices/registrar/transfer-credit/international-transfer-credit/
International Transfer Credit | King University
pricing 67 223.3× 504 💰 Pricing
https://www.king.edu/about/offices/business-office/business-office-faq/
Business Office - FAQ | King University
pricing 67 106.1× 1067 💰 Pricing
https://www.king.edu/about/offices/registrar/graduation/dress-code/
Dress Code | King University
pricing 67 140.0× 806 💰 Pricing
https://www.king.edu/about/offices/security-and-safety/release-of-records/
Release of Records | King University
pricing 67 156.8× 719 💰 Pricing
https://www.king.edu/about/office-of-the-president/creating-a-soulful-university/
“Creating a Soulful University”: Installation Address by Dr. Andy Tooley | King University
pricing 67 33.9× 3431 💰 Pricing
https://www.king.edu/about/offices/registrar/transfer-credit/
Transfer Credit | King University
pricing 67 163.6× 689 💰 Pricing
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/about/ 174 57 0% 523.8× High JS Bloat
/student-life/ 112 60 0% 384.1× High JS Bloat
/academics/ 61 55 0% 645.0× High JS Bloat
/admissions/ 35 58 0% 455.3× High JS Bloat
/events/ 26 56 0% 490.7× High JS Bloat
/faith-and-values/ 22 56 0% 465.8× High JS Bloat
/current-students/ 12 59 0% 330.4× High JS Bloat
/faculty-and-staff/ 2 47 0% 1315.1× High JS Bloat
/explore-social-work-at-king/ 1 67 0% 109.1× High JS Bloat
/withdrawal-from-the-university-return-to-title-iv-calculation/ 1 57 0% 332.0× High JS Bloat
/post-withdrawal-disbursement-policy-2/ 1 57 0% 389.3× High JS Bloat
/king-university-coronavirus-repose-and-relief-supplemental-appropriations-act-crrsaa-june-2022/ 1 57 0% 296.9× High JS Bloat
/baccalaureate-service/ 1 47 0% 693.1× High JS Bloat
/cohort-default-rate/ 1 47 0% 658.3× High JS Bloat
/a-light-on-the-hill-how-a-singular-family-foundation-transformed-king/ 1 67 0% 168.4× High JS Bloat
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/king.edu

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar education Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to king.edu. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
king.edu (this site) 79 87 WordPress 3.8× 1
nashvillerotary.org 80 84 WordPress 3.0× 1 Compare →
cmhs.uog.edu.et 83 90 WordPress 2.6× 1 Compare →
paramountcommunication.com 85 90 WordPress 3.0× 1 Compare →
jukushiru.com 81 88 WordPress 3.5× 3 Compare →
allmynursejobs.com 81 90 WordPress 4.4× 3 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite king.edu when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to king.edu. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is King?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what King does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does King work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with King."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for king.edu:

Current Score
87
Projected Score
90
Improvement
+3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →