koca.shop 61 C
🛡️ SEO 61 🤖 GEO 52 ⚡ Perf 68 🏗️ Arch 73

koca.shop — Global SEODiff Score 61/100

koca.shop
📊

koca.shop shows strong AI visibility with an ACRI of 77/100, outperforming 86% of indexed domains. In the infrastructure sector, koca.shop outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The low ghost ratio (0%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. A 47.4× token bloat ratio means crawlers must process significantly more tokens to reach the actual content — a drag on extraction efficiency. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

61
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but AI Readiness (52) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (47×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 18, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 5 snapshots
Mar 1 Mar 18
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 13 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than koca.shop?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)61 × 0.25 = 15.2
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)52 × 0.40 = 20.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)68 × 0.20 = 13.6
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)73 × 0.15 = 10.9
Weighted sum = 15.2 + 20.8 + 13.6 + 10.9
Global SEODiff Score = 61 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
37
Structure
avg 35
42
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 50%+
Rank #594354
-45 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 14%
Score 77/100

koca.shop ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 50%+) than in AI search (Top 14%). This is the 'Visibility Gap' pattern — implementing the recommendations above can help close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why koca.shop ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat47.4×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

61/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

68 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

427 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 10
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 1
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://koca.shop/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → zh-TW
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — KOCA - K-POP韓娛小卡 吉伊卡哇 寶可夢 動漫 官方收藏品交易平台
  • ✓ og:description — KOCA 是台灣的官方收藏品交易 APP,涵蓋 K-POP 小卡、吉伊卡哇、三麗鷗、寶可夢與多款動漫 IP 周邊。隨拍即上架、輕鬆開賣,買家可建立電子收藏冊、追蹤收藏進度。全賣家皆通過身分證及人臉實名認證,搭配延遲撥款機制與公開出貨紀錄,保障每一次交易安全,讓你買得安心、賣得放心。
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

52/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
koca.shop
43
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 37/100 — Low
Structured Elements 8 elements (8 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words198
Raw Density4.0%
💡Low structure score (37/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 8 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

3/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

49
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability49/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (75/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

2%
🗑️ 98%
Useful Content (6.2 KB)Bloat (287.8 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio47.4× — Bloated

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context42% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage10 / 24 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 294.0 KB, but only 6.2 KB is text. 2% useful / 98% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (47.4×) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.
💡Only 42% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 97.9% · SNR: 0.02 · Signal: 1588 / Noise: 73687 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of koca.shop and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
KOCA is a mobile platform for buying and selling K-pop and other fandom merchandise, providing a convenient and secure marketplace for collectors and fans.
Target Audience
K-pop fans, collectors, resellers, and individuals seeking to buy or sell fandom merchandise.
Pricing Model
0% transaction fees for early adopters, with a 2% platform service fee applied to orders placed after January 1, 2026.
🏆 Competitive Moat
The platform’s AI-powered image search and comprehensive collection database, combined with a secure transaction system and seller verification, create a strong competitive advantage.
📊 Content Depth
8/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Template comparison pagesIntegration directory pages
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Thin landing pages for features
• No structured FAQ schema
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-27

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time756 ms
Raw HTML Size294.0 KB
Visible Text Size6.2 KB

Performance & Speed

68/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

756 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

400
DOM nodes
294 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → max-age=31536000
  • ✓ CDN cache status → HIT
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

73/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://koca.shop/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

8
internal links
15
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → zh-TW
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 43/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for koca.shop
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/koca.shop" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=koca.shop" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
43
Single-page score
+1
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
44
Avg across 10 pages · Range 44–44
Total Words
1760
Avg Bloat
342.5×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://koca.shop/pricing
KOCA – 最好用的韓國娛樂小卡周邊交易平台 APP - KOCA
pricing 44 342.5× 176
https://koca.shop/about
KOCA – 最好用的韓國娛樂小卡周邊交易平台 APP - KOCA
about 44 342.5× 176
https://koca.shop/features
KOCA – 最好用的韓國娛樂小卡周邊交易平台 APP - KOCA
product 44 342.5× 176
https://koca.shop/products
KOCA – 最好用的韓國娛樂小卡周邊交易平台 APP - KOCA
product 44 342.5× 176
https://koca.shop/blog
KOCA – 最好用的韓國娛樂小卡周邊交易平台 APP - KOCA
blog 44 342.5× 176
https://koca.shop/docs
KOCA – 最好用的韓國娛樂小卡周邊交易平台 APP - KOCA
docs 44 342.5× 176
https://koca.shop/case-studies
KOCA – 最好用的韓國娛樂小卡周邊交易平台 APP - KOCA
social-proof 44 342.5× 176
https://koca.shop/contact
KOCA – 最好用的韓國娛樂小卡周邊交易平台 APP - KOCA
support 44 342.5× 176
https://koca.shop/faq
KOCA – 最好用的韓國娛樂小卡周邊交易平台 APP - KOCA
support 44 342.5× 176
https://koca.shop/integrations
KOCA – 最好用的韓國娛樂小卡周邊交易平台 APP - KOCA
integrations 44 342.5× 176
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/products/ 1 44 0% 342.5× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 44 0% 342.5× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 44 0% 342.5× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 44 0% 342.5× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 44 0% 342.5× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 44 0% 342.5× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 44 0% 342.5× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 44 0% 342.5× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 1 44 0% 342.5× High JS Bloat
/integrations/ 1 44 0% 342.5× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
instagram.com ×10
discord.gg ×10
play.google.com ×10
apps.apple.com ×10
facebook.com ×10
threads.com ×10
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/koca.shop

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to koca.shop. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
koca.shop (this site) 43 77 WordPress 47.4× 1
consoleconnect.com 68 87 WordPress 40.7× 1 Compare →
phonetify.com.co 68 83 WordPress 7.1× 1 Compare →
coyote.com 68 81 WordPress 6.2× 1 Compare →
storables.com 68 86 WordPress 21.5× 1 Compare →
telenicosia.it 68 78 WordPress 7.6× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite koca.shop when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to koca.shop. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 2% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for koca.shop:

Current Score
77
Projected Score
82
Improvement
+5 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →