lilith.com 45 D
🛡️ SEO 30 🤖 GEO 34 ⚡ Perf 63 🏗️ Arch 74

lilith.com — Global SEODiff Score 45/100

lilith.com
📊

At 60/100, lilith.com falls in the moderate bracket of AI-Readiness, suggesting its content is partially accessible to AI systems but not fully optimized. Within the infrastructure vertical, this places lilith.com above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The rendering approach is hybrid, with a moderate ghost ratio of 30% — most content is accessible without JS, though some elements are client-rendered. Heavy markup overhead (50.0× bloat) forces AI systems to wade through excess code before finding useful information. Zero schema blocks puts this site at a disadvantage in knowledge graph and AI-answer pipelines that rely on explicit structured data. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

45
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Traditional SEO (30) has the most room for improvement.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (315×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than lilith.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)30 × 0.25 = 7.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)34 × 0.40 = 13.6
⚡ Performance (20% weight)63 × 0.20 = 12.6
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)74 × 0.15 = 11.1
Weighted sum = 7.5 + 13.6 + 12.6 + 11.1
Global SEODiff Score = 45 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
84
Rendering
avg 93
22
Structure
avg 35
0
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 3%
Rank #34012
+49 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 52%
Score 60/100

lilith.com punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why lilith.com ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat50×+

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

30/100 25 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

📝 Title Tag

15 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

532 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✗ Has <h2> headings — found 0
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✗ Canonical tag present
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → zh-CN
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✗ og:title
  • ✗ og:description
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

34/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
lilith.com
23
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

👻
Shadow Content Detected: 30% of your page token budget is in non-rendered regions (JavaScript-dependent content that AI crawlers may not process). Combined with 315.3x token bloat, AI models are using most of their context window on noise instead of your real content. This dramatically increases hallucination probability — models fill the gap with made-up facts.
Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 30%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 22/100 — Low
Structured Elements 2 elements (2 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words139
Raw Density1.4%
💡Low structure score (22/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 2 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

28
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability28/100 — AI models can barely extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (100/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

1%
🗑️ 99%
Useful Content (11.5 KB)Bloat (3610.3 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio50×+ — Bloated

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context87% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage65 / 75 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 3621.8 KB, but only 11.5 KB is text. 1% useful / 99% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (50×+) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 99.7% · SNR: 0.00 · Signal: 2940 / Noise: 924247 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
ServerTengine
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time591 ms
Raw HTML Size3621.8 KB
Visible Text Size11.5 KB

Performance & Speed

63/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

591 ms
Acceptable — room for improvement

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

447
DOM nodes
3622 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

74/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://lilith.com/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

18
internal links
10
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → zh-CN
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 23/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for lilith.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/lilith.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=lilith.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 48 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
23
Single-page score
+1
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
24
Avg across 48 pages · Range 0–39
Total Words
2485
Avg Bloat
9281.0×
RAG Fractures [?]
3
⚠️
3 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 3 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.lilith.com/games
莉莉丝游戏
other 39 46.6× 103
https://www.lilith.com/us
莉莉丝游戏
other 39 48.5× 69
https://www.lilith.com/news/1a0a1a545eb0e5934720ce3ba55587f7
莉莉丝游戏
pricing 32 9016.2× 82 💰 Pricing
https://www.lilith.com/corporate_responsibility
莉莉丝游戏
other 32 614.5× 64
https://www.lilith.com/news
莉莉丝游戏
other 32 4389.0× 84
https://www.lilith.com/corporate_responsibility/1
莉莉丝游戏
other 32 128.0× 59
https://www.lilith.com/corporate_responsibility/2
莉莉丝游戏
other 32 147.2× 59
https://www.lilith.com/corporate_responsibility/3
莉莉丝游戏
other 32 148.9× 59
https://www.lilith.com/corporate_responsibility/4
莉莉丝游戏
other 32 124.9× 59
https://www.lilith.com/corporate_responsibility/5
莉莉丝游戏
other 32 168.8× 59
https://www.lilith.com/corporate_responsibility/6
莉莉丝游戏
other 32 120.5× 59
https://www.lilith.com/news/3e0c859c7674e2062a49db77b93e2970
莉莉丝游戏
pricing 32 9072.4× 82 💰 Pricing
https://www.lilith.com/news/4093324061aebccae6c5031f4cd5b81b
莉莉丝游戏
pricing 32 9107.1× 82 💰 Pricing
https://www.lilith.com/news/4bd10b73a372bd9fb497a38371762c83
莉莉丝游戏
pricing 32 9071.5× 82 💰 Pricing
https://www.lilith.com/news/51c4e620cb23335864bbf1e9ef76ac4c
莉莉丝游戏
pricing 32 9237.7× 82 💰 Pricing
https://www.lilith.com/news/5422dd24fc885876d42886265cae8a9a
莉莉丝游戏
pricing 32 9329.6× 82 💰 Pricing
https://www.lilith.com/news/6f68147c9217a6efb8459230967d1f82
莉莉丝游戏
pricing 32 9045.0× 82 💰 Pricing
https://www.lilith.com/news/736679f64ae3554b5bd316018ccfe84d
莉莉丝游戏
pricing 32 9524.5× 82 💰 Pricing
https://www.lilith.com/news/7afda5fb661c2ed783f5cf808397c7fc
莉莉丝游戏
pricing 32 9048.7× 82 💰 Pricing
https://www.lilith.com/news/8e3f2006f2c224027eccaeb7fc9414b4
莉莉丝游戏
pricing 32 9150.9× 82 💰 Pricing
Showing 20 of 48 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/news/ 23 32 1% 9109.6× Bot Blocked
/corporate_responsibility/ 7 32 1% 207.5× Bot Blocked
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/games/ 1 39 0% 46.6× High JS Bloat
/integrity/ 1 22 1% 4226.8× Bot Blocked
/termofservice/ 1 22 1% 44947.2× Bot Blocked
/privacy/ 1 22 1% 78790.2× Bot Blocked
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/childsafety/ 1 22 1% 22478.8× Bot Blocked
/us/ 1 39 0% 48.5× High JS Bloat
/growth/ 1 22 1% 13293.2× Bot Blocked
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/lilith.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to lilith.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
lilith.com (this site) 23 60 Custom / Proprietary 315.3× 0
pornobolt.red 48 66 Custom / Proprietary 8.3× 0 Compare →
school.fitnesshouse.ru 48 68 Custom / Proprietary 17.1× 0 Compare →
megre.ru 48 66 Custom / Proprietary 19.2× 0 Compare →
servrdigital1.com.br 48 70 Custom / Proprietary 2.3× 0 Compare →
inverclyde.gov.uk 48 68 Custom / Proprietary 3.2× 0 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite lilith.com when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to lilith.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Lilith",
  "url": "https://lilith.com",
  "logo": "https://lilithimage.lilithcdn.com/allgames-official-web/lilith/pc/cn/favicon.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Lilith",
  "url": "https://lilith.com",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://lilith.com/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 0% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for lilith.com:

Current Score
60
Projected Score
75
Improvement
+15 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →