lipscosme.com 63 C
🛡️ SEO 40 🤖 GEO 76 ⚡ Perf 53 🏗️ Arch 80

lipscosme.com — Global SEODiff Score 63/100

lipscosme.com
📊

With a solid 82/100 ACRI, lipscosme.com is well-positioned for AI search — better than 96% of sites in the Radar. Within the infrastructure vertical, this places lipscosme.com above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. The 11.5× token bloat ratio falls within the normal range, though there is room to trim navigation, footer, and script overhead. Minimal structured data (1 block) limits the site's ability to communicate entity relationships to AI systems. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

63
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (40) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Fix title tag length → +3 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 30 snapshots
Feb 22 Mar 21
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 20 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 20 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 18 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 16 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than lipscosme.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)40 × 0.25 = 10.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)76 × 0.40 = 30.4
⚡ Performance (20% weight)53 × 0.20 = 10.6
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)80 × 0.15 = 12.0
Weighted sum = 10.0 + 30.4 + 10.6 + 12.0
Global SEODiff Score = 63 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
100
Structure
avg 35
2
Schema
avg 9
70
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 2%
Rank #19735
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 4%
Score 82/100

lipscosme.com has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why lipscosme.com ranks here

Tech stackRuby on Rails
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat11.5×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

40/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

73 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

391 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 2
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 11
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://lipscosme.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✗ HTML lang attribute
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — LIPS|コスメ・美容・メイクの口コミアプリ|リップス
  • ✓ og:description — 日本最大級のコスメ・美容サービスLIPS[リップス]で自分にぴったりのコスメを見つけてお得に購入しよう!リアルなクチコミから魅力的なコスメに出会えたり、おしゃれなあの子や有名人のメイク方法もわかる!ランキングや役立つ記事も充実!最新トレンドや人気コスメを探すならLIPSで♪
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

76/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
lipscosme.com
67
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 100/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 234 elements (234 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words557
Raw Density42.0%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

1/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

64
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability64/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

8%
🗑️ 92%
Useful Content (11.7 KB)Bloat (123.4 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio11.5× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context73% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage127 / 174 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 91.3% · SNR: 0.09 · Signal: 2998 / Noise: 31601 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of lipscosme.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
This website provides a curated ranking of sunscreen products, recommended by dermatologists, to help users find the best sunscreen for
Target Audience
Consumers seeking sunscreen recommendations, particularly those with sensitive skin, and looking for guidance on choosing the right sunscreen based on skin type and concerns.
Pricing Model
The website primarily operates on affiliate marketing, earning commissions from product sales through links to retailers like Amazon, Rakuten, and Qoo10. Products are listed with varying prices, ranging from affordable to premium.
🔗 Integration Partners
AmazonRakutenQoo10
🏆 Competitive Moat
The website’s competitive advantage lies in its dermatologist-backed rankings and detailed product reviews, combined with a community-driven approach through user testimonials and recommendations, creating a trusted resource for sunscreen selection.
📊 Content Depth
8/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Ranking listsProduct reviewsSkin type filtersUser testimonials
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Limited SEO signals beyond ranking lists and reviews.
• Lack of direct monetization beyond affiliate links.
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-01

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkRuby on Rails
AI-Readiness Score70/100
Servernginx
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1018 ms
Raw HTML Size135.2 KB
Visible Text Size11.7 KB

Performance & Speed

53/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1018 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1484
DOM nodes
135 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → max-age=0, private, must-revalidate
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
doubleclick.net
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

80/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://lipscosme.com/sitemaps/sitemap.xml.gz
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

243
internal links
11
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✗ HTML lang attribute
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 67/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for lipscosme.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/lipscosme.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=lipscosme.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 122 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
67
Single-page score
-3
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
65
Avg across 122 pages · Range 0–70
Total Words
780192
Avg Bloat
80.1×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://lipscosme.com/rankings/520
【本日更新】日焼け止めクリームのおすすめ人気ランキング200選。皮膚科医が選び方や使い方を監修【2026年】 | LIPS
pricing 70 90.9× 7163 💰 Pricing
https://lipscosme.com/rankings/556
香水(ユニセックス)おすすめ人気ランキング200選【2026年2月】1000万人のLIPSユーザーが選ぶ口コミ第1位はSNSで話題の商品がランクイン! | LIPS
pricing 70 82.3× 7034 💰 Pricing
https://lipscosme.com/rankings/516
炭酸系入浴剤おすすめ人気ランキング200選【2026年2月】1000万人のLIPSユーザーが選ぶ口コミ第1位はSNSで話題の商品がランクイン! | LIPS
pricing 70 89.9× 6453 💰 Pricing
https://lipscosme.com/rankings/409
【本日更新】リップスクラブのおすすめ人気ランキング88選。美容皮膚科医が選び方や使い方を監修【2026年】 | LIPS
pricing 70 81.3× 3370 💰 Pricing
https://lipscosme.com/rankings/216
【2026年2月】スクラブ洗顔・ゴマージュのおすすめ人気ランキング168選。ドラッグストアで買えるプチプラも | LIPS
pricing 70 85.3× 6076 💰 Pricing
https://lipscosme.com/rankings/170
【本日更新】ヘアブラシおすすめ人気ランキング200選。プレゼントにぴったりな高級アイテムも【2026年】 | LIPS
pricing 70 87.4× 6861 💰 Pricing
https://lipscosme.com/rankings/135
メイクアップキットおすすめ人気ランキング200選【2026年2月】1000万人のLIPSユーザーが選ぶ口コミ第1位はSNSで話題の商品がランクイン! | LIPS
pricing 70 78.7× 7978 💰 Pricing
https://lipscosme.com/rankings/406
【本日更新】ワンデー(1DAY)カラコンのおすすめ人気ランキング200選。眼科医が選び方・使い方を監修【2026年】 | LIPS
pricing 70 87.2× 6569 💰 Pricing
https://lipscosme.com/rankings/343
【本日更新】クッションファンデーションのおすすめ人気ランキング200選。プチプラからデパコス、韓国コスメまで紹介【2026年】 | LIPS
pricing 70 85.0× 8556 💰 Pricing
https://lipscosme.com/rankings/533
【本日更新】市販シャンプーのおすすめ人気ランキング200選。プロが頭皮の悩みに合わせた選び方や使い方を監修【2026年】 | LIPS
pricing 70 97.5× 7208 💰 Pricing
https://lipscosme.com/rankings/506
【本日更新】リップティントのおすすめ人気ランキング200選。プロが選び方や使い方を監修【2026年】 | LIPS
pricing 70 93.6× 6936 💰 Pricing
https://lipscosme.com/rankings/413
【2026年2月】単色アイシャドウのおすすめ人気ランキング200選。プロが垢抜けたい初心者向けの選び方や使い方を解説 | LIPS
pricing 70 85.8× 7490 💰 Pricing
https://lipscosme.com/rankings/73
【2026年2月】パウダーチークのおすすめ人気ランキング200選。プチプラからデパコスまで紹介! | LIPS
pricing 70 84.3× 8004 💰 Pricing
https://lipscosme.com/rankings/71
【本日更新】リキッドアイライナーのおすすめ人気ランキング200選。プチプラからデパコスまで!【2026年】 | LIPS
pricing 70 82.7× 8510 💰 Pricing
https://lipscosme.com/rankings/137
【本日更新】マニキュアのおすすめ人気ランキング200選。ネイリストに聞いた選び方や使い方も紹介【2026年】 | LIPS
pricing 70 83.6× 7188 💰 Pricing
https://lipscosme.com/rankings/256
【本日更新】ヘアミストのおすすめ人気ランキング200選。美容師監修のもと選び方や使い方も紹介【2026年】 | LIPS
pricing 70 86.0× 7324 💰 Pricing
https://lipscosme.com/rankings/401
【2026年2月】アイシャドウベースのおすすめ人気ランキング56選。プチプラからデパコスまで! | LIPS
pricing 70 85.1× 2188 💰 Pricing
https://lipscosme.com/rankings/121
【本日更新】プレストパウダーのおすすめ人気ランキング200選。プロ監修で悩み別・年代別の選び方も紹介【2026年】 | LIPS
pricing 70 84.5× 8575 💰 Pricing
https://lipscosme.com/rankings/420
【本日更新】パレットコンシーラーのおすすめ人気ランキング101選。プロに聞いた選び方やカバー力が上がる使い方も紹介【2026年】 | LIPS
pricing 70 82.5× 4147 💰 Pricing
https://lipscosme.com/rankings/158
【本日更新】まつ毛美容液のおすすめ人気ランキング200選。プロに聞いた選び方や効果的な使い方も紹介【2026年】 | LIPS
pricing 70 85.5× 7695 💰 Pricing
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/rankings/ 112 70 0% 85.0× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/contact/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/products/ 1 57 0% 55.4× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/about/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/blog/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 44 0% 200.7× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 122 pages
instagram.com ×114
lips-shopping.com ×114
tiktok.com ×114
lipsapp.onelink.me ×114
twitter.com ×114
appbrew.io ×114
biz.lipscosme.com ×114
youtube.com ×114
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/lipscosme.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to lipscosme.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
lipscosme.com (this site) 67 82 Ruby on Rails 11.5× 1
grupocasalima.com 87 96 WordPress 11.4× 5 Compare →
profitserver.net 86 90 WordPress 3.8× 2 Compare →
driphydration.com 86 95 WordPress 1.9× 2 Compare →
melbourneschool.com 86 87 Custom / Proprietary 5.0× 4 Compare →
insuranceyet.com 86 87 Custom / Proprietary 4.9× 4 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite lipscosme.com when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to lipscosme.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Lipscosme",
  "url": "https://lipscosme.com",
  "logo": "https://cdn.lipscosme.com/assets/favicon/apple-touch-icon-3de9c502eee27a5326b62125f9e8ed8d19460139004d42dc58602d6a6dc54bf4.png",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 8% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Lipscosme?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Lipscosme does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Lipscosme work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Lipscosme."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for lipscosme.com:

Current Score
82
Projected Score
96
Improvement
+14 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →