looke.com.br 56 D
🛡️ SEO 45 🤖 GEO 77 ⚡ Perf 27 🏗️ Arch 57

looke.com.br — Global SEODiff Score 56/100

looke.com.br
📊

looke.com.br shows strong AI visibility with an ACRI of 72/100, outperforming 73% of indexed domains. In the ecommerce sector, looke.com.br outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. Token bloat registers at 5.2× — acceptable, but reducing inline scripts and redundant markup could yield measurable gains. Minimal structured data (1 block) limits the site's ability to communicate entity relationships to AI systems. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

56
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Performance (27) has the most room for improvement.
🎯 Top Fix: Add HSTS header → +2 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 8 snapshots
Feb 28 Mar 21
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 21 Content change detected
📈 Mar 21 ACRI +1 (49→50)
🔄 Mar 20 Content change detected
📉 Mar 19 ACRI -1 (50→49)
🔄 Mar 16 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than looke.com.br?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)45 × 0.25 = 11.2
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)77 × 0.40 = 30.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)27 × 0.20 = 5.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)57 × 0.15 = 8.5
Weighted sum = 11.2 + 30.8 + 5.4 + 8.5
Global SEODiff Score = 56 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
27
Structure
avg 35
42
Schema
avg 9
55
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 25%
Rank #252424
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 27%
Score 72/100

looke.com.br has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why looke.com.br ranks here

Tech stackExpress
Industryecommerce
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat5.2×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

45/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

47 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

165 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✗ Has <h2> headings — found 0
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.looke.com.br
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✗ HTML lang attribute
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Looke - assista a séries de TV e filmes online
  • ✓ og:description — O Looke é uma plataforma de streaming completa que oferece acesso ilimitados a filmes, séries, conteúdo infantil, conteúdos originais e exclusivos, e muito mais!
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

77/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the ecommerce sector, 24sevenmegastore.com (ACRI: 89) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
looke.com.br
50
Your ACRI Score
89
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. 24sevenmegastore.com has schema coverage of 4 blocks and uses Django. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 27/100 — Low
Structured Elements 45 elements (45 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words2034
Raw Density2.2%
💡Low structure score (27/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 45 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

1/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

63
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability63/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (60/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

19%
🗑️ 81%
Useful Content (61.0 KB)Bloat (254.7 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio5.2× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context36% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage75 / 207 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Only 36% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 80.7% · SNR: 0.24 · Signal: 15627 / Noise: 65192 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of looke.com.br and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
This SaaS platform helps users manage their projects and workflows effectively.
Target Audience
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
Pricing Model
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
🏆 Competitive Moat
SEMANTIC VOID
📊 Content Depth
1/10
⚡ Key Pain Points
• 404 error
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-12

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkExpress
AI-Readiness Score55/100
ServerKestrel
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time2291 ms
Raw HTML Size315.7 KB
Visible Text Size61.0 KB

Performance & Speed

27/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

2291 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1994
DOM nodes
316 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → private
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

57/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.looke.com.br/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

9
internal links
5
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✗ HTML lang attribute
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 50/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for looke.com.br
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/looke.com.br" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=looke.com.br" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
50
Single-page score
-28
Severe hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
22
Avg across 10 pages · Range 22–22
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 50, but internal pages average only 22 — a -28-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Total Words
410
Avg Bloat
118.9×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://looke.com.br/pricing
Oops
pricing 22 118.9× 41
https://looke.com.br/about
Oops
about 22 118.9× 41
https://looke.com.br/products
Oops
product 22 118.9× 41
https://looke.com.br/features
Oops
product 22 118.9× 41
https://looke.com.br/docs
Oops
docs 22 118.9× 41
https://looke.com.br/blog
Oops
blog 22 118.9× 41
https://looke.com.br/case-studies
Oops
social-proof 22 118.9× 41
https://looke.com.br/faq
Oops
support 22 118.9× 41
https://looke.com.br/contact
Oops
support 22 118.9× 41
https://looke.com.br/integrations
Oops
integrations 22 118.9× 41
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/integrations/ 1 22 1% 118.9× Bot Blocked
/pricing/ 1 22 1% 118.9× Bot Blocked
/about/ 1 22 1% 118.9× Bot Blocked
/features/ 1 22 1% 118.9× Bot Blocked
/blog/ 1 22 1% 118.9× Bot Blocked
/products/ 1 22 1% 118.9× Bot Blocked
/docs/ 1 22 1% 118.9× Bot Blocked
/case-studies/ 1 22 1% 118.9× Bot Blocked
/contact/ 1 22 1% 118.9× Bot Blocked
/faq/ 1 22 1% 118.9× Bot Blocked
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
api.whatsapp.com ×10
instagram.com ×10
twitter.com ×10
facebook.com ×10
tiktok.com ×10
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/looke.com.br

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar ecommerce Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to looke.com.br. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
looke.com.br (this site) 50 72 Express 5.2× 1
winwin.rs 75 86 Express 5.3× 1 Compare →
elcometer.com 75 85 Express 3.8× 1 Compare →
lifemieres.com 75 80 Express 3.5× 0 Compare →
lesidom.ru 75 80 Express 3.4× 0 Compare →
tempgun.ru 75 80 Express 3.3× 0 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite looke.com.br when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to looke.com.br. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Com",
  "url": "https://looke.com.br",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://looke.com.br/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Com?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Com does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Com work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Com."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for looke.com.br:

Current Score
72
Projected Score
82
Improvement
+10 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →