medi.de 75 B
🛡️ SEO 49 🤖 GEO 90 ⚡ Perf 59 🏗️ Arch 97

medi.de — Global SEODiff Score 75/100

medi.de
📊

The AI-Readiness profile for medi.de is strong: an ACRI of 82/100 places it ahead of 96% of domains in the index. In the news sector, medi.de outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. The token bloat ratio sits at a lean 1.6×, meaning the ratio of code to visible content is efficient — crawlers spend their token budget on actual information. With 4 JSON-LD schema blocks, the site provides explicit machine-readable metadata that enhances AI comprehension. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

75
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (49) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 17, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 4 snapshots
Mar 2 Mar 17
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
📉 Mar 12 ACRI -2 (84→82)
Does your site score higher than medi.de?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)49 × 0.25 = 12.2
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)90 × 0.40 = 36.0
⚡ Performance (20% weight)59 × 0.20 = 11.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)97 × 0.15 = 14.5
Weighted sum = 12.2 + 36.0 + 11.8 + 14.5
Global SEODiff Score = 75 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
100
Structure
avg 35
8
Schema
avg 9
60
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 12%
Rank #121583
-8 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 4%
Score 82/100

medi.de is more visible to Google than to AI models. There's room to improve AI discoverability to match your search reputation. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why medi.de ranks here

Tech stackTYPO3
Industrynews
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage4 blocks
Token bloat1.6×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

49/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

35 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

168 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 3
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.medi.de/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → de-DE
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — medi. ich fühl mich besser. | medi
  • ✓ og:description — Innovative Lösungen für mehr Lebensqualität – mit den Marken medi, CEP und ITEM m6. Kompressionsstrümpfe, orthopädische Hilfsmittel, Sport- und Fashion-Produkte.
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

90/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 100/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 420 elements (420 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1144
Raw Density36.7%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks4 blocks

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

77
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability77/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (50/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

62%
🗑️ 38%
Useful Content (238.2 KB)Bloat (150.3 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio1.6× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context86% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage25 / 29 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

85 Entropy
Good Token Bloat: Low
Noise Ratio: 38.7% · SNR: 1.58 · Signal: 60985 / Noise: 38487 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of medi.de and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
This SaaS platform provides AI-powered sprint planning and resource optimization for distributed teams, helping them improve productivity and reduce wasted time.
Target Audience
Engineering managers, product managers, agile coaches, and teams involved in software development and project management.
Pricing Model
Subscription-based with tiered pricing: Free plan, Pro ($10/user/month), and Enterprise (custom pricing).
🔗 Integration Partners
SlackGitHubJira
🛡️ Compliance Standards
SOC 2
🏆 Competitive Moat
AI-driven sprint planning and real-time resource allocation, providing a significant advantage over traditional project management tools.
📊 Content Depth
8/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Integration directory pagesTemplate comparison pagesBlog posts on specific back pain types (acute, subacute, chronic)Whitepaper on stress and back health
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of structured FAQ schema
• Thin landing pages for features
• Difficulty diagnosing the root cause of back pain (specific vs. nonspecific)
• Challenges in preventing back pain through proper posture and movement
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-02-28

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkTYPO3
AI-Readiness Score60/100
ServerApache
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time679 ms
Raw HTML Size388.6 KB
Visible Text Size238.2 KB

Performance & Speed

59/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

679 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1464
DOM nodes
389 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → max-age=53615
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

97/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.medi.de/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

442
internal links
9
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → de-DE
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

✓ TOP 15% AI-READY

🏆 You Are AI-Verified — Claim Your Badge

Your site scores 82/100 on the AI-Crawler Reality Index. Embed this trust badge on your site — every click sends visitors to your verified report and builds backlinks to your domain.

AI-Verified badge for medi.de
Verified — updates automatically every 24h
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/medi.de" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=medi.de" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

How it works: The badge queries your ACRI score daily. If your score drops below 80 or your site hasn't been scanned in 30 days, the badge changes to "Pending Audit" (yellow) — prompting you to fix issues and rescan. Learn about ACRI methodology →

� Deep Crawl Analysis 1009 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
82
Single-page score
-20
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
62
Avg across 1009 pages · Range 0–72
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 82, but internal pages average only 62 — a -20-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Topical Cohesion
3%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
543954
Avg Bloat
183.8×
RAG Fractures [?]
9
⚠️
9 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 9 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.medi.de/en/products/highlights/m4sr-pcl-dynamic-brace/
M.4s® PCL dynamic brace from medi
pricing 72 20.0× 3824 💰 Pricing
https://www.medi.de/diagnose-therapie/lipoedem/krankheitsbild-lipoedem/
Lipödem – Symptome erkennen und behandeln | medi
docs 72 48.1× 1817
https://www.medi.de/diagnose-therapie/venenleiden/offenes-bein/
Offenes Bein (Ulcus cruris) - Ursachen, Behandlung, Wundpflege | medi | ulcus cruris, offene verletzung am schienbein, nässende wunde
pricing 72 42.7× 2062 💰 Pricing
https://www.medi.de/arzt/therapietipps/orthopaedische-therapie/kreuzbandruptur-vordere/
Vordere Kreuzbandruptur | medi
pricing 72 39.5× 2236 💰 Pricing
https://www.medi.de/diagnose-therapie/lymphoedem/krankheitsbild-lymphoedem/
Lymphödem: Ursachen, Behandlung, Lebensqualität | medi
docs 72 40.6× 2263
https://www.medi.de/diagnose-therapie/arthrose/gonarthrose/
Gonarthrose – Ursachen und Behandlung von Kniearthrose | medi
docs 72 54.3× 1581
https://www.medi.de/diagnose-therapie/knieschmerzen/kreuzbandriss/
Kreuzbandriss, was tun? Ursachen, Symptome, Therapie | medi
pricing 72 46.1× 1889 💰 Pricing
https://www.medi.de/diagnose-therapie/rueckenbeschwerden/rueckenschmerzen/
Rückenschmerzen: Ursachen, Behandlung, Tipps | medi
docs 72 49.1× 1779
https://www.medi.de/arzt/therapietipps/orthopaedische-therapie/bandagen-schienen/
Gonarthrose Therapie nach S2k-Leitlinie | medi
docs 72 46.4× 1914
https://www.medi.de/en/company/international/
medi International – Global Player – I feel better | medi
pricing 69 75.8× 821 💰 Pricing
https://www.medi.de/en/company/history/
medi company history and milestones | medi
pricing 69 56.6× 1141 💰 Pricing
https://www.medi.de/en/company/awards/german-brand-award/
German Brand Award winners – medi receives another award in 2021 | medi
pricing 69 49.9× 1248 💰 Pricing
https://www.medi.de/en/company/guided-tour/
Guided tour of the company | medi
pricing 69 52.9× 1215 💰 Pricing
https://www.medi.de/en/products/igli-control/
igli Control | medi
pricing 69 120.4× 528 💰 Pricing
https://www.medi.de/en/products/orthosesbraces/back-orthoses/lumbamedr-plus/
Lumbamed® plus lumbar brace for stabilisation | medi
pricing 69 105.6× 670 💰 Pricing
https://www.medi.de/en/products/stabimed-pro/
Stabimed® pro | medi
pricing 69 116.6× 553 💰 Pricing
https://www.medi.de/en/products/genumedi-pa/
Genumedi® PA for Pes anserinus syndrome | medi
pricing 69 66.5× 1069 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.medi.de/en/products/igli-hardboot/
igli carbon foot orthotics: also suitable for children’s feet | medi
pricing 69 120.5× 562 💰 Pricing
https://www.medi.de/en/products/lumbamed-disc/
Lumbamed® disc | medi
pricing 69 87.5× 742 💰 Pricing
https://www.medi.de/en/products/manumed-rfx/
Manumed® RFX – also as alternative to plaster cast | medi
pricing 69 118.7× 530 💰 Pricing
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/en/ 184 68 0% 105.5× High JS Bloat
/produkte/ 117 68 0% 144.8× High JS Bloat
/diagnose-therapie/ 69 69 0% 87.4× High JS Bloat
/gesundes-leben/ 33 69 0% 109.5× High JS Bloat
/unternehmen/ 29 69 0% 116.6× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 29 68 0% 135.9× High JS Bloat
/arzt/ 21 69 0% 100.0× High JS Bloat
/fachhandel/ 13 69 0% 114.4× High JS Bloat
/digitale-systeme/ 2 69 0% 106.1× High JS Bloat
/therapiekonzepte/ 1 69 0% 148.7× High JS Bloat
/newsroom/ 1 69 0% 104.8× High JS Bloat
/medi-partner/ 1 69 0% 67.2× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 1009 pages
item-m6.com ×1000
cepsports.com ×1000
vimeo.com ×601
youtube.com ×597
tiktok.com ×597
linkedin.com ×597
instagram.com ×597
pinterest.de ×597
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/medi.de

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar news Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to medi.de. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
medi.de (this site) 82 82 TYPO3 1.6× 4
hhla.de 78 81 TYPO3 2.6× 1 Compare →
ukw.de 77 80 TYPO3 1.6× 0 Compare →
uks.eu 75 80 TYPO3 10.0× 2 Compare →
jpc.de 79 81 Custom / Proprietary 1.6× 3 Compare →
codico.com 82 87 Express 3.4× 3 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite medi.de when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to medi.de. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Medi",
  "url": "https://medi.de",
  "logo": "https://sf.medi.de/logo/favicon.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Medi",
  "url": "https://medi.de",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://medi.de/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Medi?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Medi does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Medi work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Medi."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for medi.de:

Current Score
82
Projected Score
95
Improvement
+13 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →