mercy.net 71 B
🛡️ SEO 49 🤖 GEO 77 ⚡ Perf 74 🏗️ Arch 89

mercy.net — Global SEODiff Score 71/100

mercy.net
📊

mercy.net achieves a 69/100 on the AI-Crawler Reality Index, reflecting above-average readiness for AI-driven discovery. Within the healthcare vertical, this places mercy.net above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. The token bloat ratio sits at a lean 4.7×, meaning the ratio of code to visible content is efficient — crawlers spend their token budget on actual information. No structured data was detected, which means AI systems must infer all entities and relationships from raw HTML alone. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

71
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (49) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add Organization + WebSite JSON-LD → +5–8 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 20, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 4 snapshots
Mar 5 Mar 20
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 20 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 15 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than mercy.net?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)49 × 0.25 = 12.2
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)77 × 0.40 = 30.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)74 × 0.20 = 14.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)89 × 0.15 = 13.3
Weighted sum = 12.2 + 30.8 + 14.8 + 13.3
Global SEODiff Score = 71 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
97
Rendering
avg 93
40
Structure
avg 35
0
Schema
avg 9
65
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 3%
Rank #25338
+34 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 36%
Score 69/100

mercy.net punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why mercy.net ranks here

Tech stackAdobe Experience Manager
Industryhealthcare
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat4.7×

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

49/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

55 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

171 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 6
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.mercy.net/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Your life is our life's work | Mercy
  • ✓ og:description — Mercy is one of the largest U.S. health systems with 44 acute care & specialty hospitals, over 700 physician & outpatient clinics in Arkansas, Kansas, Missouri & Oklahoma.
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

77/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the healthcare sector, hairdresserfind.com.au (ACRI: 86) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
mercy.net
51
Your ACRI Score
86
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. hairdresserfind.com.au has schema coverage of 4 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 10%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 40/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 74 elements (74 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1511
Raw Density4.9%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

56
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability56/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

21%
🗑️ 79%
Useful Content (28.5 KB)Bloat (106.0 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio4.7× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context35% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage7 / 20 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Only 35% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

8 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 78.8% · SNR: 0.27 · Signal: 7292 / Noise: 27140 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of mercy.net and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Mercy provides access to healthcare information and services through its website, including patient portals and educational resources. It focuses on
Target Audience
Patients, healthcare professionals, community members, and those seeking health information and support.
Pricing Model
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
🛡️ Compliance Standards
HIPAASOC 2
🏆 Competitive Moat
Strong community ties and a demonstrated commitment to providing care during crises, combined with a robust digital infrastructure for accessing services.
📊 Content Depth
6/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Links to disaster recovery resourcesLinks to patient portal (MyMercy)Links to other Mercy facilities
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Limited information on specific health conditions beyond general resources
• Lack of a direct pathway to schedule appointments or access personalized care plans
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-01

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score65/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time605 ms
Raw HTML Size134.5 KB
Visible Text Size28.5 KB

Performance & Speed

74/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

605 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

771
DOM nodes
134 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → max-age=0, no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate
  • ✓ CDN cache status → DYNAMIC
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

89/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.mercy.net/sitemap-index.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

101
internal links
6
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 51/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for mercy.net
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/mercy.net" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=mercy.net" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 112 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
51
Single-page score
-2
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
49
Avg across 112 pages · Range 0–77
Topical Cohesion
6%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
36009
Avg Bloat
112.8×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.mercy.net/about/legal-notices/
Website Terms & Privacy | Mercy
pricing 77 5.2× 5219 💰 Pricing
https://www.mercy.net/about/history/joplin/joplin-tornado/
Rebuilding After Joplin Tornado | Mercy
pricing 75 17.5× 1353 💰 Pricing
https://www.mercy.net/about/
About Mercy | Mercy
pricing 75 14.5× 1776 💰 Pricing
https://www.mercy.net/about/mercy-technology-services/mts-senior-leadership/
MTS Senior Leadership | Mercy
about 75 38.5× 673
https://mercy.net/about
About Mercy | Mercy
pricing 75 14.5× 1776 💰 Pricing
https://www.mercy.net/about/history/oklahoma-city/
Heritage & History | Oklahoma City | Mercy
about 70 33.5× 633
https://www.mercy.net/about/history/joplin/
Heritage & History | Joplin MO | Mercy
pricing 70 34.7× 622 💰 Pricing
https://www.mercy.net/about/our-communities/community-benefits/
Community Benefits | Mercy
pricing 70 21.8× 1260 💰 Pricing
https://www.mercy.net/about/virtual-care-program/
Mercy Virtual Care Program | Mercy
pricing 70 24.6× 1014 💰 Pricing
https://www.mercy.net/practice/mercy-rehabilitation-hospital-south/about/therapeutic-technology/
Therapeutic Technology | Mercy
about 62 29.6× 726
https://www.mercy.net/practice/mercy-cancer-center-joplin/about/
About Mercy Joplin Cancer Center | Mercy
about 62 38.2× 555
https://www.mercy.net/practice/mercy-rehabilitation-hospital-oklahoma-city-south/about/admissions-criteria/
Admissions Criteria | Mercy
about 62 39.9× 531
https://www.mercy.net/practice/mercy-rehabilitation-hospital-northwest-arkansas/about/admissions-criteria/
Admissions Criteria | Mercy
about 62 39.9× 531
https://www.mercy.net/practice/mercy-david-m-sindelar-cancer-center-south-st-louis/about/
About | David Sindelar Cancer Center St. Louis | Mercy
about 62 41.9× 508
https://www.mercy.net/about/history/
History & Heritage | Mercy
about 62 37.5× 577
https://www.mercy.net/practice/mercy-rehabilitation-hospital-fort-smith/about/therapeutic-technology/
Therapeutic Technology | Mercy
about 62 29.6× 721
https://www.mercy.net/about/history/lincoln/
Heritage & History | Lincoln County | Mercy
pricing 62 29.4× 714 💰 Pricing
https://www.mercy.net/about/history/st-louis/
Heritage & History | St. Louis Missouri | Mercy
about 62 26.5× 807
https://www.mercy.net/about/history/washington/
History & Heritage | Washington Missouri | Mercy
about 60 75.4× 275
https://www.mercy.net/about/history/ardmore/
History & Heritage | Ardmore Oklahoma | Mercy
about 60 76.9× 272
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/about/ 79 54 0% 131.9× High JS Bloat
/practice/ 23 53 0% 81.8× High JS Bloat
/service/ 1 42 0% 337.7× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/contact/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/blog/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 112 pages
facebook.com ×103
give.mercyhealthfoundation.net ×103
youtube.com ×103
mercylink.mercy.net ×103
linkedin.com ×103
twitter.com ×103
careers.mercy.net ×103
mercyhealthfoundation.net ×3
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/mercy.net

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar healthcare Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to mercy.net. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
mercy.net (this site) 51 69 Adobe Experience Manager 4.7× 0
welchallyn.com 76 83 Adobe Experience Manager 2.1× 3 Compare →
hillrom.com 76 83 Adobe Experience Manager 2.1× 3 Compare →
recipes.heart.org 76 80 Express 2.7× 0 Compare →
byramhealthcare.com 76 86 Sitecore 4.0× 1 Compare →
citymall.com.mm 76 80 Express 1.9× 0 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite mercy.net when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to mercy.net. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Mercy",
  "url": "https://mercy.net",
  "logo": "https://mercy.net/etc.clientlibs/mercy/clientlibs/resources/images/favicons/favicon.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Mercy",
  "url": "https://mercy.net",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://mercy.net/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Mercy?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Mercy does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Mercy work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Mercy."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for mercy.net:

Current Score
69
Projected Score
85
Improvement
+16 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →