mudes.org.br 64 C
🛡️ SEO 50 🤖 GEO 71 ⚡ Perf 80 🏗️ Arch 50

mudes.org.br — Global SEODiff Score 64/100

mudes.org.br
📊

The AI-Readiness score for mudes.org.br is 60/100 — a middling result that leaves significant room to climb the Radar rankings. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. With a 1.6× bloat ratio, the page delivers its content without excessive boilerplate, giving AI systems a clean extraction path. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

64
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (50) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add HSTS header → +2 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 7 snapshots
Feb 23 Mar 21
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than mudes.org.br?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)50 × 0.25 = 12.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)71 × 0.40 = 28.4
⚡ Performance (20% weight)80 × 0.20 = 16.0
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)50 × 0.15 = 7.5
Weighted sum = 12.5 + 28.4 + 16.0 + 7.5
Global SEODiff Score = 64 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
0
Structure
avg 35
2
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 50%+
Rank #936840
-41 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 52%
Score 60/100

mudes.org.br ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 50%+) than in AI search (Top 52%). This is the 'Visibility Gap' pattern — implementing the recommendations above can help close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why mudes.org.br ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
Industry
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat1.6×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

50/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

68 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

204 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 8
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://mudes.org.br/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → tr
  • ✅ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Matbet | Matbet Üyelik ve Hesap İşlemleri | Matbet Güncel Giriş
  • ✓ og:description — Matbet üyelik oluşturma ve hesap işlemleri güncel bağlantılarla güvenli şekilde gerçekleştirilir. Popüler oyunlar, güncel bonuslar ve hızlı destek hizmetleriyle avantajlı bir deneyim sunar.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

71/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 0/100 — Poor
Structured Elements 0 elements (0 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1412
Raw Density0.0%
💡Low structure score (0/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 0 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

1/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
✅ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

45
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability45/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (10/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

62%
🗑️ 38%
Useful Content (12.4 KB)Bloat (7.0 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio1.6× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage1 / 1 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

85 Entropy
Good Token Bloat: Low
Noise Ratio: 36.0% · SNR: 1.78 · Signal: 3175 / Noise: 1788 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
ServerLiteSpeed
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time933 ms
Raw HTML Size19.4 KB
Visible Text Size12.4 KB

Performance & Speed

80/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

933 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

110
DOM nodes
19 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

50/100 15 % of Global Score 🔴 Low Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

0
internal links
0
external links
Very few internal links — crawlers may miss important pages

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → tr
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 40/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for mudes.org.br
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/mudes.org.br" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=mudes.org.br" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
40
Single-page score
+50
Subpages outperform homepage
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
90
Avg across 10 pages · Range 90–90
Total Words
14050
Avg Bloat
2.8×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://mudes.org.br/pricing
Matbet | Matbet Üyelik ve Hesap İşlemleri | Matbet Güncel Giriş
pricing 90 2.8× 1405
https://mudes.org.br/about
Matbet | Matbet Üyelik ve Hesap İşlemleri | Matbet Güncel Giriş
about 90 2.8× 1405
https://mudes.org.br/products
Matbet | Matbet Üyelik ve Hesap İşlemleri | Matbet Güncel Giriş
product 90 2.8× 1405
https://mudes.org.br/features
Matbet | Matbet Üyelik ve Hesap İşlemleri | Matbet Güncel Giriş
product 90 2.8× 1405
https://mudes.org.br/docs
Matbet | Matbet Üyelik ve Hesap İşlemleri | Matbet Güncel Giriş
docs 90 2.8× 1405
https://mudes.org.br/blog
Matbet | Matbet Üyelik ve Hesap İşlemleri | Matbet Güncel Giriş
blog 90 2.8× 1405
https://mudes.org.br/case-studies
Matbet | Matbet Üyelik ve Hesap İşlemleri | Matbet Güncel Giriş
social-proof 90 2.8× 1405
https://mudes.org.br/contact
Matbet | Matbet Üyelik ve Hesap İşlemleri | Matbet Güncel Giriş
support 90 2.8× 1405
https://mudes.org.br/integrations
Matbet | Matbet Üyelik ve Hesap İşlemleri | Matbet Güncel Giriş
integrations 90 2.8× 1405
https://mudes.org.br/faq
Matbet | Matbet Üyelik ve Hesap İşlemleri | Matbet Güncel Giriş
support 90 2.8× 1405
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/contact/ 1 90 0% 2.8× Healthy
/integrations/ 1 90 0% 2.8× Healthy
/blog/ 1 90 0% 2.8× Healthy
/faq/ 1 90 0% 2.8× Healthy
/pricing/ 1 90 0% 2.8× Healthy
/products/ 1 90 0% 2.8× Healthy
/about/ 1 90 0% 2.8× Healthy
/case-studies/ 1 90 0% 2.8× Healthy
/features/ 1 90 0% 2.8× Healthy
/docs/ 1 90 0% 2.8× Healthy
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/mudes.org.br

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to mudes.org.br. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
mudes.org.br (this site) 40 60 Custom / Proprietary 1.6× 1
ogonline.nl 50 71 Custom / Proprietary 3.1× 1 Compare →
virtuoteca.it 50 68 Custom / Proprietary 1.8× 0 Compare →
bd-tec.com.qanator.com 50 67 Custom / Proprietary 1.4× 0 Compare →
pcroom.ge 50 66 Custom / Proprietary 2.0× 0 Compare →
enough.org 50 69 Custom / Proprietary 3.6× 0 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite mudes.org.br when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to mudes.org.br. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Org",
  "url": "https://mudes.org.br",
  "logo": "https://mudes.org.br/favicon.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Org",
  "url": "https://mudes.org.br",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://mudes.org.br/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for mudes.org.br:

Current Score
60
Projected Score
70
Improvement
+10 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →