multifactor.ru 69 C
🛡️ SEO 59 🤖 GEO 84 ⚡ Perf 34 🏗️ Arch 92

multifactor.ru — Global SEODiff Score 69/100

multifactor.ru
📊

The AI-Readiness profile for multifactor.ru is strong: an ACRI of 77/100 places it ahead of 86% of domains in the index. Within the infrastructure vertical, this places multifactor.ru above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. The 8.8× token bloat ratio falls within the normal range, though there is room to trim navigation, footer, and script overhead. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

69
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (34) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 16, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than multifactor.ru?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)59 × 0.25 = 14.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)84 × 0.40 = 33.6
⚡ Performance (20% weight)34 × 0.20 = 6.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)92 × 0.15 = 13.8
Weighted sum = 14.8 + 33.6 + 6.8 + 13.8
Global SEODiff Score = 69 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
64
Structure
avg 35
2
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 2%
Rank #22812
+12 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 14%
Score 77/100

multifactor.ru shows stronger AI visibility than traditional SEO ranking. Great AI foundation to build on. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why multifactor.ru ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat8.8×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

59/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

61 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

314 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 12
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://multifactor.ru/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ru
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — МУЛЬТИФАКТОР | Решения для ИБ и ИТ
  • ✓ og:description — МУЛЬТИФАКТОР — российский разработчик ИБ- и ИТ-решений. Создаем продукты для безопасной работы ИТ-инфраструктуры бизнеса. Соответствуем PCI DSS и являемся лицензиатом ФСТЭК
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

84/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
multifactor.ru
67
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 64/100 — Good
Structured Elements 145 elements (145 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1189
Raw Density12.2%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

56
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability56/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (50/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

11%
🗑️ 89%
Useful Content (34.7 KB)Bloat (269.3 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio8.8× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context93% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage65 / 70 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 88.6% · SNR: 0.13 · Signal: 8892 / Noise: 68929 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of multifactor.ru and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
Target Audience
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
Pricing Model
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-01

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servernginx
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time2561 ms
Raw HTML Size304.0 KB
Visible Text Size34.7 KB

Performance & Speed

34/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

2561 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1246
DOM nodes
304 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

92/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://multifactor.ru/sitemap_index.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

111
internal links
41
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ru
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 67/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for multifactor.ru
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/multifactor.ru" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=multifactor.ru" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 115 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
67
Single-page score
-6
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
62
Avg across 115 pages · Range 0–75
Topical Cohesion
12%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
128974
Avg Bloat
46.8×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://multifactor.ru/docs/radius-adapter/radiusv2-server-dlya-windows/
RadiusV2 сервер для Windows | МУЛЬТИФАКТОР
docs 75 16.5× 3824
https://multifactor.ru/docs/enroll/
Настройка аутентификации MULTIFACTOR | МУЛЬТИФАКТОР
pricing 75 19.8× 3359 💰 Pricing
https://multifactor.ru/docs/radius-adapter/windows/
Radius сервер для Windows | МУЛЬТИФАКТОР
pricing 75 16.6× 3787 💰 Pricing
https://multifactor.ru/docs/lk/
Описание личного кабинета MULTIFACTOR | МУЛЬТИФАКТОР
pricing 75 15.8× 4915 💰 Pricing
https://multifactor.ru/docs/radius-adapter/radiusv2-server-dlya-linux/
RadiusV2 сервер для Linux | МУЛЬТИФАКТОР
docs 75 15.1× 4385
https://multifactor.ru/docs/radius-adapter/radius-server-dlya-linux/
Radius сервер для Linux | МУЛЬТИФАКТОР
pricing 75 15.5× 4323 💰 Pricing
https://multifactor.ru/docs/mfdirectory-sync/
MULTIFACTOR Directory Sync | МУЛЬТИФАКТОР
docs 70 23.5× 2514
https://multifactor.ru/docs/api/users/
API управления пользователями | МУЛЬТИФАКТОР
docs 70 26.5× 2114
https://multifactor.ru/docs/faq/
Вопросы и ответы по системе MULTIFACTOR | МУЛЬТИФАКТОР
docs 70 25.9× 2028
https://multifactor.ru/docs/ldap-adapter/ldap-proxy-server-dlya-linux/
Ldap proxy сервер для Linux | МУЛЬТИФАКТОР
docs 70 25.9× 2118
https://multifactor.ru/docs/utility/windows-logon-2fa/
Настройка двухфакторной аутентификации при входе в Windows | МУЛЬТИФАКТОР
docs 70 22.9× 2594
https://multifactor.ru/docs/baza-znanij/exchange-activesync-iis-adapter/
Настройка 2FA Exchange ActiveSync через MultiFactor.IIS.Adapter | МУЛЬТИФАКТОР
pricing 67 55.3× 921 💰 Pricing
https://multifactor.ru/docs/features/
Возможности MULTIFACTOR: обзор двухфакторной аутентификации
docs 67 42.9× 1230
https://multifactor.ru/docs/radius-adapter/radius-adapter/
MULTIFACTOR Radius Adapter | МУЛЬТИФАКТОР
docs 67 56.5× 877
https://multifactor.ru/docs/vpn/fpsu/
ФПСУ-IP/Клиент для подключения к VPN c 2FA | МУЛЬТИФАКТОР
docs 67 55.3× 916
https://multifactor.ru/docs/wifi-ap-2fa/
Настройка двухфакторной аутентификации точки доступа Wi-Fi | МУЛЬТИФАКТОР
docs 67 54.7× 898
https://multifactor.ru/docs/integrating-dotnet-core/
Интеграция для .NET Core | МУЛЬТИФАКТОР
docs 67 38.6× 1313
https://multifactor.ru/docs/apps/bitrix24-2fa/
Настройка двухфакторной аутентификации 1С-Bitrix24 | МУЛЬТИФАКТОР
docs 67 57.1× 892
https://multifactor.ru/docs/vpn/s-terra-vpn-2fa/
Настройка двухфакторной аутентификации С-Терра VPN | МУЛЬТИФАКТОР
docs 67 54.8× 919
https://multifactor.ru/docs/baza-znanij/deckhouse-stronghold/
Настройка двухфакторной аутентификации Deckhouse Stronghold | МУЛЬТИФАКТОР
docs 67 47.7× 1052
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/docs/ 106 67 0% 50.8× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/blog/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/about/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/contact/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 115 pages
multidirectory.ru ×106
multistatus.ru ×106
multipushed.ru ×106
t.me ×106
vk.com ×106
tenchat.ru ×106
habr.com ×106
dzen.ru ×106
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/multifactor.ru

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to multifactor.ru. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
multifactor.ru (this site) 67 77 WordPress 8.8× 1
profitserver.net 86 90 WordPress 3.8× 2 Compare →
driphydration.com 86 95 WordPress 1.9× 2 Compare →
grupocasalima.com 87 96 WordPress 11.4× 5 Compare →
safely.co.jp 90 90 WordPress 1.9× 3 Compare →
hi-ad.jp 86 90 WordPress 3.1× 5 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite multifactor.ru when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to multifactor.ru. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Multifactor",
  "url": "https://multifactor.ru",
  "logo": "https://multifactor.ru/wp-content/themes/multifactor/img/logo_small_blue.svg",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Multifactor?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Multifactor does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Multifactor work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Multifactor."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for multifactor.ru:

Current Score
77
Projected Score
89
Improvement
+12 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →