nameshield.com 70 B
🛡️ SEO 75 🤖 GEO 75 ⚡ Perf 47 🏗️ Arch 82

nameshield.com — Global SEODiff Score 70/100

nameshield.com
📊

nameshield.com shows strong AI visibility with an ACRI of 80/100, outperforming 94% of indexed domains. Within the social vertical, this places nameshield.com above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Content is delivered server-side, meaning bots and AI agents can parse the full page without executing JavaScript. The 12.5× token bloat ratio falls within the normal range, though there is room to trim navigation, footer, and script overhead. Minimal structured data (1 block) limits the site's ability to communicate entity relationships to AI systems. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

70
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (47) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 20, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 7 snapshots
Feb 23 Mar 20
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than nameshield.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)75 × 0.25 = 18.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)75 × 0.40 = 30.0
⚡ Performance (20% weight)47 × 0.20 = 9.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)82 × 0.15 = 12.3
Weighted sum = 18.8 + 30.0 + 9.4 + 12.3
Global SEODiff Score = 70 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
51
Structure
avg 35
42
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 13%
Rank #128428
-6 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 6%
Score 80/100

nameshield.com is more visible to Google than to AI models. There's room to improve AI discoverability to match your search reputation. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why nameshield.com ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
Industrysocial
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat12.5×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

75/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

63 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

142 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 9
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.nameshield.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → fr-FR
  • ✅ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Nameshield - Sécurisation de vos noms de domaine stratégiques
  • ✓ og:description — Premier registrar certifié ISO 27001, Nameshield sécurise vos noms de domaine stratégiques et services associés. Découvrez nos solutions.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

75/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the social sector, martin-sad.ru (ACRI: 87) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
nameshield.com
64
Your ACRI Score
87
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. martin-sad.ru has schema coverage of 63 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 51/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 151 elements (114 lists, 28 rows, 9 headers)
Total Words1950
Raw Density7.7%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

3/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

59
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability59/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (50/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

8%
🗑️ 92%
Useful Content (17.5 KB)Bloat (200.9 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio12.5× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context76% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage35 / 46 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 92.0% · SNR: 0.09 · Signal: 4470 / Noise: 51433 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of nameshield.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Nameshield provides a cybersecurity solution for domain name registration and management, focusing on protecting brand identity and intellectual property online.
Target Audience
Businesses, entrepreneurs, and brand owners seeking to protect their online presence and intellectual property rights, particularly those involved in e-commerce, digital marketing, and brand management.
Pricing Model
Subscription-based, with tiered pricing plans based on the number of domains managed and the level of security features required. Details are available on their website.
🔗 Integration Partners
Let's EncryptGitHubSlack
🛡️ Compliance Standards
ISO 27001
🏆 Competitive Moat
The company’s ISO 27001 certification combined with a focus on brand protection and a comprehensive suite of services differentiates it from basic domain security providers.
📊 Content Depth
8/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Integration directory pagesTemplate comparison pages
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of structured FAQ schema
• Thin landing pages for features
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-02-28

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
ServerApache
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1244 ms
Raw HTML Size218.4 KB
Visible Text Size17.5 KB

Performance & Speed

47/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1244 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1270
DOM nodes
218 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

2
tracker scripts
2
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.comgoogle-analytics
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

82/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

144
internal links
20
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → fr-FR
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 64/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for nameshield.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/nameshield.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=nameshield.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
64
Single-page score
+3
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
67
Avg across 10 pages · Range 67–67
Total Words
15230
Avg Bloat
29.4×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://nameshield.com/pricing
Nameshield - Sécurisation de vos noms de domaine stratégiques
pricing 67 29.4× 1523 💰 Pricing
https://nameshield.com/about
Nameshield - Sécurisation de vos noms de domaine stratégiques
pricing 67 29.4× 1523 💰 Pricing
https://nameshield.com/products
Nameshield - Sécurisation de vos noms de domaine stratégiques
pricing 67 29.4× 1523 💰 Pricing
https://nameshield.com/features
Nameshield - Sécurisation de vos noms de domaine stratégiques
pricing 67 29.4× 1523 💰 Pricing
https://nameshield.com/docs
Nameshield - Sécurisation de vos noms de domaine stratégiques
pricing 67 29.4× 1523 💰 Pricing
https://nameshield.com/blog
Nameshield - Sécurisation de vos noms de domaine stratégiques
pricing 67 29.4× 1523 💰 Pricing
https://nameshield.com/case-studies
Nameshield - Sécurisation de vos noms de domaine stratégiques
pricing 67 29.4× 1523 💰 Pricing
https://nameshield.com/integrations
Nameshield - Sécurisation de vos noms de domaine stratégiques
pricing 67 29.4× 1523 💰 Pricing
https://nameshield.com/contact
Nameshield - Sécurisation de vos noms de domaine stratégiques
pricing 67 29.4× 1523 💰 Pricing
https://nameshield.com/faq
Nameshield - Sécurisation de vos noms de domaine stratégiques
pricing 67 29.4× 1523 💰 Pricing
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/blog/ 1 67 0% 29.4× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 67 0% 29.4× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 67 0% 29.4× High JS Bloat
/integrations/ 1 67 0% 29.4× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 67 0% 29.4× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 67 0% 29.4× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 67 0% 29.4× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 1 67 0% 29.4× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 67 0% 29.4× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 67 0% 29.4× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
wordpress.org ×10
secure.nameshield.net ×10
youtube.com ×10
cookieyes.com ×10
twitter.com ×10
facebook.com ×10
linkedin.com ×10
themeisle.com ×10
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/nameshield.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar social Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to nameshield.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
nameshield.com (this site) 64 80 WordPress 12.5× 1
kvaclub.ru 81 90 WordPress 6.0× 1 Compare →
recenzer.cz 83 90 WordPress 8.3× 2 Compare →
fathimaparvin.com 82 90 WordPress 5.9× 1 Compare →
marigliano.net 81 90 WordPress 4.6× 1 Compare →
blog.indianweddingsaree.com 82 90 WordPress 5.8× 3 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite nameshield.com when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to nameshield.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 8% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Nameshield?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Nameshield does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Nameshield work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Nameshield."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for nameshield.com:

Current Score
80
Projected Score
88
Improvement
+8 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history

🧠 AI Citation Graph

How this domain is cited across the machine-readable web

2.7
AI-Trust
#1085
Global Rank
40%
Percentile
4
Inbound AI Links
11
Outbound AI Links
52
Avg Inbound ACRI
Top AI Referrers
Domain ACRI AI-Trust Direction
observatoiredesmarques.fr 62 0.0 ← cites you
perf1.fr 55 0.0 ← cites you
perf1.com 49 0.0 ← cites you
nic.vegas 40 0.0 ← cites you
View Full AI-Trust Leaderboard →
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →