naresome.co.jp 67 C
🛡️ SEO 61 🤖 GEO 70 ⚡ Perf 68 🏗️ Arch 68
Radar → Domains → naresome.co.jp

naresome.co.jp — Global SEODiff Score 67/100

naresome.co.jp
📊

The AI-Readiness profile for naresome.co.jp is strong: an ACRI of 77/100 places it ahead of 86% of domains in the index. Content is delivered server-side, meaning bots and AI agents can parse the full page without executing JavaScript. Token bloat registers at 6.3× — acceptable, but reducing inline scripts and redundant markup could yield measurable gains. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

67
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (61) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add HSTS header → +2 pts
61
🛡️ Traditional SEO
70
🤖 AI Readiness
68
⚡ Performance
68
🏗️ Architecture
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 20, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 8 snapshots
Feb 23 Mar 20
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 17 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than naresome.co.jp?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)61 × 0.25 = 15.2
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)70 × 0.40 = 28.0
⚡ Performance (20% weight)68 × 0.20 = 13.6
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)68 × 0.15 = 10.2
Weighted sum = 15.2 + 28.0 + 13.6 + 10.2
Global SEODiff Score = 67 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
37
Structure
avg 35
42
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 50%+
Rank #797247
-65 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 14%
Score 77/100

naresome.co.jp ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 50%+) than in AI search (Top 14%). This is the 'Visibility Gap' pattern — implementing the recommendations above can help close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why naresome.co.jp ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
Industry—
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat6.3×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
See other WordPress sites → Full leaderboard → Domain A–Z →
🛡️

Traditional SEO

61/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

8 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

180 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 2
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 2
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://naresome.co.jp/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — 株式会社ナレソメ コーポレートサイト |
  • ✓ og:description — 株式会社ナレソメの会社紹介するコーポレートサイト。採用情報を始め、会社概要や事業内容、お知らせなど幅広く発信しています。
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

70/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

✅
GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
✅
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
✅
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
✅
Google-Extended
Allowed
✅
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 37/100 — Low
Structured Elements 5 elements (5 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words122
Raw Density4.1%
💡Low structure score (37/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 5 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

3/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

62
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability62/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (10/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

15%
🗑️ 85%
Useful Content (7.3 KB)Bloat (39.2 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio6.3× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context9% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage8 / 86 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Only 9% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 84.2% · SNR: 0.19 · Signal: 1879 / Noise: 10046 tokens
Run Full Entropy Audit →

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of naresome.co.jp and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Naresome provides a marriage consultation service leveraging data and theory to help users understand themselves and identify compatible partners, aiming
Target Audience
Individuals seeking a partner, particularly those struggling with relationship issues, desiring a long-term, fulfilling marriage, and seeking guidance in navigating the complexities of modern dating.
Pricing Model
Not explicitly stated, but implied to be subscription-based with tiered options based on service level and features.
🏆 Competitive Moat
Data-driven matching and personalized programing based on theory and user self-reflection, differentiating it from traditional marriage agencies.
📊 Content Depth
7/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
JOIN US採用情報
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of structured approach to self-discovery and partner selection.
• Difficulty understanding partner values and future visions.
• Traditional marriage agency ‘dread’ and seeking a more modern and approachable solution.
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-04-06

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
ServerApache
CDN—
HTTP Status200
Load Time1356 ms
Raw HTML Size46.6 KB
Visible Text Size7.3 KB
⚡

Performance & Speed

68/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1356 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

362
DOM nodes
47 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

68/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://naresome.co.jp/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

37
internal links
7
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 48/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for naresome.co.jp
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold 
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/naresome.co.jp" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=naresome.co.jp" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
48
Single-page score
-40
Severe hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
8
Avg across 10 pages · Range 0–50
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 48, but internal pages average only 8 — a -40-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Topical Cohesion
1%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
120
Avg Bloat
34.0×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://naresome.co.jp/about
naresome
 about 50 110.4× 84 ✓
https://naresome.co.jp/contact
naresome
 support 34 229.4× 36 ✓
https://naresome.co.jp/pricing pricing 0 0.0× 0 ✓
https://naresome.co.jp/products product 0 0.0× 0 ✓
https://naresome.co.jp/features product 0 0.0× 0 ✓
https://naresome.co.jp/blog blog 0 0.0× 0 ✓
https://naresome.co.jp/docs docs 0 0.0× 0 ✓
https://naresome.co.jp/case-studies social-proof 0 0.0× 0 ✓
https://naresome.co.jp/integrations integrations 0 0.0× 0 ✓
https://naresome.co.jp/faq support 0 0.0× 0 ✓
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/about/ 1 50 0% 110.4× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 34 0% 229.4× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/blog/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
hrmos.co ×2
youtube.com ×2
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API. 

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/naresome.co.jp

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to naresome.co.jp. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
naresome.co.jp (this site) 48 77 WordPress 6.3× 1 —
israeled.org 58 75 WordPress 6.0× 1 Compare →
eshiptransport.com 58 76 WordPress 5.3× 1 Compare →
doujinsuki.com 58 73 WordPress 5.2× 1 Compare →
kanzenin.info 58 74 WordPress 6.1× 0 Compare →
emakedonia.gr 58 73 WordPress 3.6× 2 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite naresome.co.jp when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for naresome.co.jp:

Current Score
77
Projected Score
80
Improvement
+3 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

📄 Generate llms.txt 📊 Export JSON Data 📸 Download Visual

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking
Open My Site report → Open Self-Diffing incidents → Open History timeline →

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →

📚 Research & Documentation

🔬
The Science of ACRI
Methodology behind the AI-Crawler Reality Index scoring model.
🚨
Hallucination Risk Study
How poor crawl access increases AI fabrication rates by 3.5×.
🔥
Structural Entropy Paper
The median web page wastes 55% of tokens on noise. Here's the data.
🧪
Extraction Lab Paper
Causal evidence that semantic HTML structure increases AI extraction accuracy.
📖
Documentation Hub
Metrics definitions, fix guides, and API reference for CI/CD integration.
🛠️
Free Tools
llms.txt generator, hallucination checker, entropy audit, and more.