nastygal.com 67 C
🛡️ SEO 67 🤖 GEO 65 ⚡ Perf 47 🏗️ Arch 100

nastygal.com — Global SEODiff Score 67/100

nastygal.com
📊

With a solid 83/100 ACRI, nastygal.com is well-positioned for AI search — better than 97% of sites in the Radar. In the ecommerce sector, nastygal.com outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. While the majority of content is server-rendered, the 30% ghost ratio suggests some content remains hidden from static crawlers. The bloated 50.0× token ratio highlights an urgent need to clean up non-content markup, scripts, and navigation clutter. Structured data coverage is solid at 2 blocks, covering core entities — expanding to include FAQ or Breadcrumb schemas could strengthen the profile further. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

67
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (47) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (123×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 19, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 5 snapshots
Mar 7 Mar 19
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 18 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than nastygal.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)67 × 0.25 = 16.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)65 × 0.40 = 26.0
⚡ Performance (20% weight)47 × 0.20 = 9.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)100 × 0.15 = 15.0
Weighted sum = 16.8 + 26.0 + 9.4 + 15.0
Global SEODiff Score = 67 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
84
Rendering
avg 93
100
Structure
avg 35
44
Schema
avg 9
55
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 4%
Rank #38857
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 3%
Score 83/100

nastygal.com has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why nastygal.com ranks here

Tech stackExpress
Industryecommerce
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage2 blocks
Token bloat50×+

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

67/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

44 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

143 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 1
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.nastygal.com
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✅ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Nasty Gal | Clothing, Footwear & Accessories
  • ✓ og:description — Discover the latest Nasty Gal collection only at Debenhams. With clothing, footwear & so much more, get everything you need with free delivery.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

65/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the ecommerce sector, 24sevenmegastore.com (ACRI: 89) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
nastygal.com
68
Your ACRI Score
89
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. 24sevenmegastore.com has schema coverage of 4 blocks and uses Django. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

👻
Shadow Content Detected: 30% of your page token budget is in non-rendered regions (JavaScript-dependent content that AI crawlers may not process). Combined with 123.4x token bloat, AI models are using most of their context window on noise instead of your real content. This dramatically increases hallucination probability — models fill the gap with made-up facts.
Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 30%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 100/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 334 elements (334 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1025
Raw Density32.6%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks2 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

63
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability63/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (100/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

1%
🗑️ 99%
Useful Content (6.4 KB)Bloat (777.6 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio50×+ — Bloated

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage49 / 49 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 783.9 KB, but only 6.4 KB is text. 1% useful / 99% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (50×+) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 99.2% · SNR: 0.01 · Signal: 1626 / Noise: 199054 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of nastygal.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
The Nasty Gal app provides a mobile shopping experience for browsing and purchasing products.
Target Audience
Mobile shoppers, online shoppers, fashion enthusiasts
Pricing Model
App download and in-app purchases
🏆 Competitive Moat
Convenient mobile shopping experience and personalized product recommendations.
📊 Content Depth
3/10
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-02

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkExpress
AI-Readiness Score55/100
ServerCloudFront
CDNcloudfront
HTTP Status200
Load Time533 ms
Raw HTML Size783.9 KB
Visible Text Size6.4 KB

Performance & Speed

47/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

533 ms
Acceptable — room for improvement

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

2930
DOM nodes
784 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → no-cache="Set-Cookie", max-age=900, stale-while-revalidate=600, stale-if-error=1800
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudfront

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

100/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.nastygal.com/sitemap/nastygalus/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

352
internal links
9
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 68/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for nastygal.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/nastygal.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=nastygal.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 14 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
68
Single-page score
-60
Severe hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
8
Avg across 14 pages · Range 0–29
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 68, but internal pages average only 8 — a -60-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Topical Cohesion
3%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
316
Avg Bloat
483.8×
RAG Fractures [?]
4
⚠️
4 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 4 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.nastygal.com/pages/informational/download-the-app
NGUS | Download The App
pricing 29 1104.0× 119 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.nastygal.com/track-and-return
Track Or Return Your Order
pricing 29 1850.6× 67 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.nastygal.com/track-order
Track Order
pricing 29 1968.2× 63 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.nastygal.com/pages/track-and-return
Track Or Return Your Order
pricing 29 1850.7× 67 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://nastygal.com/pricing pricing 0 0.0× 0
https://nastygal.com/about about 0 0.0× 0
https://nastygal.com/products product 0 0.0× 0
https://nastygal.com/features product 0 0.0× 0
https://nastygal.com/blog blog 0 0.0× 0
https://nastygal.com/docs docs 0 0.0× 0
https://nastygal.com/case-studies social-proof 0 0.0× 0
https://nastygal.com/faq support 0 0.0× 0
https://nastygal.com/contact support 0 0.0× 0
https://nastygal.com/integrations integrations 0 0.0× 0
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/pages/ 2 29 1% 1477.3× Bot Blocked
/contact/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/about/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/blog/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/track-and-return/ 1 29 1% 1850.6× Bot Blocked
/track-order/ 1 29 1% 1968.2× Bot Blocked
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 14 pages
tiktok.com ×4
boohooplc.com ×4
pinterest.co.uk ×4
instagram.com ×4
youtube.com ×4
careers.boohoogroup.com ×4
connect.studentbeans.com ×4
facebook.com ×4
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/nastygal.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar ecommerce Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to nastygal.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
nastygal.com (this site) 68 83 Express 123.4× 2
fitstore24.com 83 87 Express 2.3× 2 Compare →
denvic.ru 83 87 Express 2.7× 3 Compare →
decoforhome.com 86 87 Express 3.0× 4 Compare →
247garden.com 86 94 Express 5.8× 23 Compare →
pluricosmetica.com 83 89 Cloudflare Pages 2.0× 2 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite nastygal.com when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to nastygal.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 0% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Nastygal?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Nastygal does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Nastygal work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Nastygal."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for nastygal.com:

Current Score
83
Projected Score
91
Improvement
+8 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →