netlas.io 69 C
🛡️ SEO 71 🤖 GEO 72 ⚡ Perf 59 🏗️ Arch 68

netlas.io — Global SEODiff Score 69/100

netlas.io
📊

netlas.io shows strong AI visibility with an ACRI of 73/100, outperforming 75% of indexed domains. Compared to other developer sites (avg score: 57), netlas.io performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. A 14.7× bloat ratio is typical for sites in this tech tier — not wasteful, but streamlining could further boost extractability. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

69
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (59) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add HSTS header → +2 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 20, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 9 snapshots
Feb 23 Mar 20
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 18 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 16 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than netlas.io?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)71 × 0.25 = 17.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)72 × 0.40 = 28.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)59 × 0.20 = 11.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)68 × 0.15 = 10.2
Weighted sum = 17.8 + 28.8 + 11.8 + 10.2
Global SEODiff Score = 69 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
97
Rendering
avg 93
33
Structure
avg 35
42
Schema
avg 9
55
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 10%
Rank #95805
+16 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 25%
Score 73/100

netlas.io punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why netlas.io ranks here

Tech stackExpress
Industrydeveloper
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat14.7×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

71/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

61 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

164 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 6
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://netlas.io/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-us
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Netlas: Comprehensive Internet-Wide Scanning & OSINT Platform
  • ✓ og:description — Netlas provides internet-wide scanning, OSINT, DNS & WHOIS tools, and eASM services for reconnaissance and security assessment. Available as web, console, and API.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

72/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the developer sector, hikkoshizamurai.jp (ACRI: 88) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
netlas.io
56
Your ACRI Score
88
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. hikkoshizamurai.jp has schema coverage of 5 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 10%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 33/100 — Low
Structured Elements 61 elements (61 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1881
Raw Density3.2%
💡Low structure score (33/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 61 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

3/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

51
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability51/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

6%
🗑️ 94%
Useful Content (13.1 KB)Bloat (179.5 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio14.7× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context90% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage74 / 82 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 93.2% · SNR: 0.07 · Signal: 3363 / Noise: 45963 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of netlas.io and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Netlas provides a comprehensive attack surface discovery and security analysis platform for identifying and mitigating cyber risks, including shadow IT and phishing threats.
Target Audience
Security analysts, penetration testers, IT managers, CISOs, and cybersecurity professionals involved in threat hunting, vulnerability management, and security research.
Pricing Model
Light plan (free), Dark plan, System plan - Pricing details available on the website.
🔗 Integration Partners
ShodanCensysFofaZoomeyeIPinfo
🏆 Competitive Moat
AI-powered threat hunting and attack surface discovery with real-time analysis and actionable insights.
📊 Content Depth
8/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Integration directory pagesTemplate comparison pages
⚡ Key Pain Points
• No structured FAQ schema
• Thin landing pages for features
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-05

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkExpress
AI-Readiness Score55/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time560 ms
Raw HTML Size192.7 KB
Visible Text Size13.1 KB

Performance & Speed

59/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

560 ms
Acceptable — room for improvement

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1324
DOM nodes
193 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → public, max-age=0, must-revalidate
  • ✓ CDN cache status → DYNAMIC
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

68/100 15 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

74
internal links
13
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-us
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 56/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for netlas.io
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/netlas.io" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=netlas.io" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 45 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
56
Single-page score
+4
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
60
Avg across 45 pages · Range 0–90
Topical Cohesion
15%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
160066
Avg Bloat
15.9×
RAG Fractures [?]
37
⚠️
37 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 37 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://netlas.io/blog/modern_cybercrime/
Modern Cybercrime: Who’s Behind It and Who’s Stopping It - Netlas Blog
pricing 90 9.8× 6213 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://netlas.io/blog/ai_turns_criminal/
When AI Turns Criminal: Deepfakes, Voice-Cloning & LLM Malware - Netlas Blog
pricing 85 9.3× 6375 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://netlas.io/blog/top_10_critical_threat_actors/
Top 10 Critical Threat Actors to Watch in 2026: Ransomware, APTs & Defensive Strategies - Netlas Blog
pricing 85 7.3× 9669 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://netlas.io/blog/16_billion_credential_breach/
The Largest Data Breach Ever? How Hackers Stole 16 Billion Credentials - Netlas Blog
pricing 80 13.0× 3841 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://netlas.io/blog/mapping_dark_web/
Mapping Dark Web Infrastructure - Netlas Blog
pricing 80 11.5× 5095 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://netlas.io/blog/socmint/
SOCMINT: Intelligence in the Social Media Era - Netlas Blog
pricing 77 14.1× 5004 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://netlas.io/blog/bybit_hack/
The $1.5B Bybit Hack & How OSINT Led to Its Attribution - Netlas Blog
pricing 77 16.1× 4247 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://netlas.io/blog/bug_bounty_roadmap/
Bug Bounty 101 - A Complete Bug Bounty Roadmap for Beginners (2026) - Netlas Blog
pricing 75 11.9× 5104 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://netlas.io/blog/when_patches_fail/
When Patches Fail: An Analysis of Patch Bypass and Incomplete Security - Netlas Blog
pricing 75 12.7× 4509 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://netlas.io/blog/nmap_alternatives/
Best Nmap Alternatives - Netlas Blog
pricing 75 13.5× 5204 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://netlas.io/blog/zero_click_exploits/
Zero-Click Exploits - Netlas Blog
pricing 75 11.0× 5737 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://netlas.io/blog/space_cyber_threats/
From Starlink to Star Wars - The Real Cyber Threats in Space - Netlas Blog
pricing 75 10.4× 6784 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://netlas.io/blog/llm_vulnerabilities/
LLM Vulnerabilities: Why AI Models Are the Next Big Attack Surface - Netlas Blog
pricing 75 11.3× 6383 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://netlas.io/blog/hannibal_stealer_part_1/
Hannibal Stealer vs. Browser Security - Netlas Blog
pricing 75 11.4× 5712 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://netlas.io/blog/supply_chain_attack/
Supply Chain Attack - How Attackers Weaponize Software Supply Chains - Netlas Blog
pricing 75 10.7× 6351 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://netlas.io/blog/evolution_of_c2_infrastructure/
The Evolution of C2: Centralized to On-Chain - Netlas Blog
pricing 75 14.9× 4986 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://netlas.io/blog/vibe-coding-security-risks/
Top Vibe-Coding Security Risks - Netlas Blog
pricing 75 13.8× 4280 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://netlas.io/blog/what_is_threat_intelligence/
What is Threat Intelligence - Netlas Blog
pricing 75 12.2× 3894 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://netlas.io/blog/post_quantum_cryptography/
Post-Quantum Now: From AES & RSA to ML-KEM Hybrids - Netlas Blog
pricing 72 15.5× 3327 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://netlas.io/blog/best_bug_boounty_courses/
Bug Bounty 101: The Best Courses to Get Started in 2025 - Netlas Blog
pricing 72 12.9× 5285 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
Showing 20 of 45 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/blog/ 35 74 0% 19.2× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 2 67 0% 21.4× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/contact/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/about/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 45 pages
linkedin.com ×37
status.netlas.io ×37
docs.netlas.io ×37
netlas.medium.com ×37
t.me ×37
twitter.com ×37
telegram.me ×37
app.netlas.io ×37
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/netlas.io

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar developer Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to netlas.io. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
netlas.io (this site) 56 73 Express 14.7× 1
trendmaker.hu 80 87 Express 4.9× 2 Compare →
maxaroma.com 80 87 Express 5.6× 3 Compare →
bergfreunde.de 80 87 Express 3.8× 2 Compare →
berg-freunde.ch 81 87 Express 3.9× 2 Compare →
bergfreunde.fi 81 87 Express 3.8× 2 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite netlas.io when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to netlas.io. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 6% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Netlas?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Netlas does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Netlas work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Netlas."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for netlas.io:

Current Score
73
Projected Score
81
Improvement
+8 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →