newsmarket.com.tw 61 C
🛡️ SEO 47 🤖 GEO 82 ⚡ Perf 39 🏗️ Arch 55

newsmarket.com.tw — Global SEODiff Score 61/100

newsmarket.com.tw
📊

The AI-Readiness profile for newsmarket.com.tw is strong: an ACRI of 77/100 places it ahead of 86% of domains in the index. In the social sector, newsmarket.com.tw outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The low ghost ratio (0%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. A 6.2× bloat ratio is typical for sites in this tech tier — not wasteful, but streamlining could further boost extractability. Minimal structured data (1 block) limits the site's ability to communicate entity relationships to AI systems. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

61
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (39) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Fix title tag length → +3 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 16, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 6 snapshots
Feb 23 Mar 16
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 16 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than newsmarket.com.tw?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)47 × 0.25 = 11.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)82 × 0.40 = 32.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)39 × 0.20 = 7.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)55 × 0.15 = 8.2
Weighted sum = 11.8 + 32.8 + 7.8 + 8.2
Global SEODiff Score = 61 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
36
Structure
avg 35
42
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 34%
Rank #343701
-20 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 14%
Score 77/100

newsmarket.com.tw ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 34%) than in AI search (Top 14%). This is the 'Visibility Gap' pattern — implementing the recommendations above can help close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why newsmarket.com.tw ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
Industrysocial
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat6.2×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

47/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

87 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

219 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 6
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.newsmarket.com.tw/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → zh-TW
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — 上下游新聞 | 專注於台灣農業、食物、環境等公共議題的獨立媒體
  • ✓ og:description — 上下游新聞,一個專注於台灣農業、食物、環境等公共議題的獨立媒體,提供每日新聞及深度調查,將農業的精彩、面臨處境、從農業到食物的歷程,帶到大家眼前。
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

82/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the social sector, martin-sad.ru (ACRI: 87) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
newsmarket.com.tw
61
Your ACRI Score
87
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. martin-sad.ru has schema coverage of 63 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 36/100 — Low
Structured Elements 104 elements (104 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words2697
Raw Density3.9%
💡Low structure score (36/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 104 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

4/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
✅ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

62
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability62/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (50/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

16%
🗑️ 84%
Useful Content (69.6 KB)Bloat (358.9 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio6.2× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context14% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage15 / 104 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Only 14% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 83.8% · SNR: 0.19 · Signal: 17821 / Noise: 91867 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of newsmarket.com.tw and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
This SaaS platform helps distributed teams streamline project management through AI-powered sprint planning and real-time resource optimization, boosting productivity and reducing wasted time.
Target Audience
Engineering managers, product managers, agile coaches, and project managers in tech companies.
Pricing Model
Tiered subscription model with a free plan and paid plans starting from $10/user/month, offering increasing features and capacity.
🔗 Integration Partners
SlackGitHubJira
🛡️ Compliance Standards
SOC 2
🏆 Competitive Moat
AI-powered sprint planning with real-time resource optimization and predictive analytics, providing a significant advantage over traditional project management tools.
📊 Content Depth
8/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Integration directory pagesTemplate comparison pages
⚡ Key Pain Points
• No structured FAQ schema
• Thin landing pages for features
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-16

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time1916 ms
Raw HTML Size428.5 KB
Visible Text Size69.6 KB

Performance & Speed

39/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1916 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1964
DOM nodes
428 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → public, max-age=0, s-maxage=604800
  • ✓ CDN cache status → DYNAMIC
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

55/100 15 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

315
internal links
13
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → zh-TW
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 61/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for newsmarket.com.tw
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/newsmarket.com.tw" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=newsmarket.com.tw" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
61
Single-page score
-7
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
54
Avg across 10 pages · Range 54–54
Total Words
3910
Avg Bloat
222.8×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://newsmarket.com.tw/pricing
上下游新聞 | 專注於台灣農業、食物、環境等公共議題的獨立媒體
pricing 54 222.8× 391
https://newsmarket.com.tw/about
上下游新聞 | 專注於台灣農業、食物、環境等公共議題的獨立媒體
about 54 222.8× 391
https://newsmarket.com.tw/products
上下游新聞 | 專注於台灣農業、食物、環境等公共議題的獨立媒體
product 54 222.8× 391
https://newsmarket.com.tw/features
上下游新聞 | 專注於台灣農業、食物、環境等公共議題的獨立媒體
product 54 222.8× 391
https://newsmarket.com.tw/docs
上下游新聞 | 專注於台灣農業、食物、環境等公共議題的獨立媒體
docs 54 222.8× 391
https://newsmarket.com.tw/blog
上下游新聞 | 專注於台灣農業、食物、環境等公共議題的獨立媒體
blog 54 222.8× 391
https://newsmarket.com.tw/case-studies
上下游新聞 | 專注於台灣農業、食物、環境等公共議題的獨立媒體
social-proof 54 222.8× 391
https://newsmarket.com.tw/faq
上下游新聞 | 專注於台灣農業、食物、環境等公共議題的獨立媒體
support 54 222.8× 391
https://newsmarket.com.tw/integrations
上下游新聞 | 專注於台灣農業、食物、環境等公共議題的獨立媒體
integrations 54 222.8× 391
https://newsmarket.com.tw/contact
上下游新聞 | 專注於台灣農業、食物、環境等公共議題的獨立媒體
support 54 222.8× 391
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/docs/ 1 54 0% 222.8× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 54 0% 222.8× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 54 0% 222.8× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 54 0% 222.8× High JS Bloat
/integrations/ 1 54 0% 222.8× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 54 0% 222.8× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 54 0% 222.8× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 54 0% 222.8× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 1 54 0% 222.8× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 54 0% 222.8× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
instagram.com ×10
threads.net ×10
agrijourney.org ×10
youtube.com ×10
line.me ×10
facebook.com ×10
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/newsmarket.com.tw

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar social Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to newsmarket.com.tw. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
newsmarket.com.tw (this site) 61 77 WordPress 6.2× 1
kvaclub.ru 81 90 WordPress 6.0× 1 Compare →
fathimaparvin.com 82 90 WordPress 5.9× 1 Compare →
marigliano.net 81 90 WordPress 4.6× 1 Compare →
blog.indianweddingsaree.com 82 90 WordPress 5.8× 3 Compare →
officesnapshots.com 81 84 WordPress 1.9× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite newsmarket.com.tw when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to newsmarket.com.tw. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Com?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Com does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Com work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Com."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for newsmarket.com.tw:

Current Score
77
Projected Score
83
Improvement
+6 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →