notta.ai 58 D
🛡️ SEO 54 🤖 GEO 52 ⚡ Perf 47 🏗️ Arch 94

notta.ai — Global SEODiff Score 58/100

notta.ai
📊

The AI-Readiness profile for notta.ai is strong: an ACRI of 69/100 places it ahead of 64% of domains in the index. Within the healthcare vertical, this places notta.ai above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The low ghost ratio (5%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. Heavy markup overhead (50.0× bloat) forces AI systems to wade through excess code before finding useful information. Minimal structured data (1 block) limits the site's ability to communicate entity relationships to AI systems. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

58
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Performance (47) has the most room for improvement.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (91×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 20, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 4 snapshots
Mar 4 Mar 20
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 15 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than notta.ai?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)54 × 0.25 = 13.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)52 × 0.40 = 20.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)47 × 0.20 = 9.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)94 × 0.15 = 14.1
Weighted sum = 13.5 + 20.8 + 9.4 + 14.1
Global SEODiff Score = 58 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
0
Structure
avg 35
42
Schema
avg 9
75
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 4%
Rank #41073
+32 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 36%
Score 69/100

notta.ai punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why notta.ai ranks here

Tech stackGatsby
Industryhealthcare
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat50×+

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

54/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

41 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

314 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 8
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.notta.ai/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✅ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — 自動文字起こしサービス | Notta
  • ✓ og:description — Nottaは最新のAI音声認識エンジンを搭載する高精度な文字起こしサービスです。リアルタイム文字起こしと翻訳機能を備え、また、1度に最長5時間までの音声ファイルを素早くテキスト化が可能。PCで音声変換や編集も気軽に行います。
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

52/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the healthcare sector, adwordsguide.com (ACRI: 86) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
notta.ai
34
Your ACRI Score
86
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. adwordsguide.com has schema coverage of 4 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 0/100 — Poor
Structured Elements 0 elements (0 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1099
Raw Density0.0%
💡Low structure score (0/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 0 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ✅ Present
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
✅ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

36
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability36/100 — AI models can barely extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (85/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

1%
🗑️ 99%
Useful Content (21.7 KB)Bloat (1949.3 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio50×+ — Bloated

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context97% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage225 / 232 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 1970.9 KB, but only 21.7 KB is text. 1% useful / 99% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (50×+) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 98.9% · SNR: 0.01 · Signal: 5551 / Noise: 499009 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkGatsby
AI-Readiness Score75/100
ServerAmazonS3
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time541 ms
Raw HTML Size1970.9 KB
Visible Text Size21.7 KB

Performance & Speed

47/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

541 ms
Acceptable — room for improvement

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

2102
DOM nodes
1971 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

94/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.notta.ai/sitemap-0.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

116
internal links
8
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 34/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for notta.ai
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/notta.ai" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=notta.ai" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 80 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
34
Single-page score
+9
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
43
Avg across 80 pages · Range 0–56
Topical Cohesion
21%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
44703
Avg Bloat
3074.2×
RAG Fractures [?]
76
⚠️
76 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 76 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://notta.ai/pricing
文字起こし料金プラン | Notta
pricing 56 343.4× 1278 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.notta.ai/es/pricing
Precios de Notta: Compara Planes, Características y Costos
pricing 56 255.9× 1672 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.notta.ai/de/pricing
Notta-Preise: Vergleichen Sie Pläne, Funktionen und Kosten
pricing 56 298.9× 1431 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.notta.ai/vi/pricing
Giá Notta: So sánh Kế hoạch, Tính năng và Chi phí
pricing 56 183.4× 2336 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.notta.ai/pricing
文字起こし料金プラン | Notta
pricing 56 343.4× 1278 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.notta.ai/ko/pricing
Notta 가격: 요금제, 기능 및 비용 비교
pricing 56 340.5× 1256 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.notta.ai/id/pricing
Harga Notta: Bandingkan Rencana, Fitur, dan Biaya
pricing 56 289.9× 1475 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.notta.ai/pt/pricing
Preços do Notta: Compare Planos, Recursos e Custos
pricing 56 258.7× 1654 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.notta.ai/fr/pricing
Tarification de Notta : Comparez les Plans, Caractéristiques et Coûts
pricing 56 244.8× 1749 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.notta.ai/cs/pricing
Ceny Notta: Porovnejte plány, funkce a náklady
pricing 56 304.9× 1403 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.notta.ai/nl/pricing
Notta Prijzen: Vergelijk Plannen, Kenmerken en Kosten
pricing 56 292.5× 1462 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.notta.ai/it/pricing
Prezzi di Notta: Confronta Piani, Caratteristiche e Costi
pricing 56 258.7× 1654 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.notta.ai/tr/pricing
Notta Fiyatlandırması: Planları, Özellikleri ve Maliyetleri Karşılaştır
pricing 56 306.4× 1396 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.notta.ai/pl/pricing
Cennik Notta: Porównaj Plany, Funkcje i Koszty
pricing 56 292.1× 1464 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.notta.ai/uk/pricing
Ціни Notta: Порівняйте плани, функції та витрати
pricing 56 286.4× 1501 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.notta.ai/fa/pricing
قیمت‌گذاری Notta: مقایسه طرح‌ها، ویژگی‌ها و هزینه‌ها
pricing 56 247.5× 1734 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.notta.ai/ar/pricing
أسعار Notta: قارن الخطط والميزات والتكاليف
pricing 56 284.5× 1508 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.notta.ai/th/pricing
ราคา Notta: เปรียบเทียบแผน ฟีเจอร์ และค่าใช้จ่าย
pricing 56 588.7× 733 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.notta.ai/hi/pricing
Notta मूल्य निर्धारण: योजनाओं, सुविधाओं और लागतों की तुलना करें
pricing 56 247.6× 1743 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.notta.ai/en/pricing
Notta Pricing: Compare Plans, Features & Costs
pricing 56 283.5× 1508 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
Showing 20 of 80 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/blog/ 35 45 0% 1497.0× High JS Bloat
/es/ 2 46 0% 1065.8× High JS Bloat
/fr/ 2 46 0% 1104.4× High JS Bloat
/vi/ 2 51 0% 802.4× High JS Bloat
/pt/ 2 46 0% 1116.3× High JS Bloat
/nl/ 2 46 0% 1318.1× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 2 56 0% 343.4× High JS Bloat
/de/ 2 46 0% 1233.5× High JS Bloat
/ko/ 2 46 0% 1481.4× High JS Bloat
/id/ 2 46 0% 1235.0× High JS Bloat
/hi/ 2 46 0% 1114.0× High JS Bloat
/tr/ 2 46 0% 1269.5× High JS Bloat
/cs/ 2 46 0% 1262.0× High JS Bloat
/fa/ 2 46 0% 1091.5× High JS Bloat
/uk/ 2 46 0% 1275.1× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 80 pages
facebook.com ×76
linkedin.com ×76
youtube.com ×76
play.google.com ×76
apps.apple.com ×76
twitter.com ×76
app.notta.ai ×76
support.notta.ai ×76
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/notta.ai

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar healthcare Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to notta.ai. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
notta.ai (this site) 34 69 Gatsby 90.9× 1
cagw.org 59 77 WordPress 13.9× 1 Compare →
scanx.trade 59 78 Angular 34.9× 1 Compare →
convert-powerpoint-to-pdf.pdffiller.com 59 71 Express 2.8× 1 Compare →
alec.org 59 77 WordPress 4.5× 1 Compare →
napaanesthesia.com 59 83 WordPress 18.7× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite notta.ai when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to notta.ai. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Notta",
  "url": "https://notta.ai",
  "logo": "https://notta.ai/favicon-32x32.png?v=5a82a935fa969efc06f13812b38286bc",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Notta",
  "url": "https://notta.ai",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://notta.ai/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 1% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Notta?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Notta does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Notta work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Notta."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for notta.ai:

Current Score
69
Projected Score
87
Improvement
+18 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →