numerama.com 73 B
🛡️ SEO 72 🤖 GEO 77 ⚡ Perf 52 🏗️ Arch 93

numerama.com — Global SEODiff Score 73/100

numerama.com
📊

numerama.com achieves a 71/100 on the AI-Crawler Reality Index, reflecting above-average readiness for AI-driven discovery. Within the infrastructure vertical, this places numerama.com above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. With a 2.9× bloat ratio, the page delivers its content without excessive boilerplate, giving AI systems a clean extraction path. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. The site allows access to some AI bots but restricts others, creating an uneven visibility profile across AI-powered services.

73
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (52) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Fix title tag length → +3 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 14 snapshots
Feb 22 Mar 21
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than numerama.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)72 × 0.25 = 18.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)77 × 0.40 = 30.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)52 × 0.20 = 10.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)93 × 0.15 = 13.9
Weighted sum = 18.0 + 30.8 + 10.4 + 13.9
Global SEODiff Score = 73 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
80
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
36
Structure
avg 35
42
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 1%
Rank #14483
+29 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 30%
Score 71/100

numerama.com punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why numerama.com ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat2.9×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

72/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

92 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

109 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 12
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.numerama.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → fr-FR
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Numerama, le média de référence sur la société numérique et l'innovation technologique
  • ✓ og:description — Dossiers, analyses, actualités : Toutes les clés pour comprendre le numérique et ses enjeux avec Numerama.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

77/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
numerama.com
61
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Blocked
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 36/100 — Low
Structured Elements 163 elements (163 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words4164
Raw Density3.9%
💡Low structure score (36/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 163 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

3/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

66
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
Low
Blocklist Risk
Extractability66/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (50/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskLow — 1 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

34%
🗑️ 66%
Useful Content (160.4 KB)Bloat (298.6 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio2.9× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context99% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage74 / 75 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

52 Entropy
Fair Token Bloat: Medium
Noise Ratio: 65.1% · SNR: 0.54 · Signal: 41065 / Noise: 76435 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of numerama.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Adrenalin is a software designed to accelerate eDonkey by leveraging a technique similar to doping, aiming to improve file transfer
Target Audience
Developers, tech enthusiasts, and users of P2P networks seeking to enhance their eDonkey experience.
Pricing Model
Freemium; Numerama+ subscription for ad-free access and advanced features.
🔗 Integration Partners
eDonkeyMorpheusKazaaGnutella
🏆 Competitive Moat
Unique approach to eDonkey optimization through a symbiotic relationship with the original software, combined with advanced features and a focus on community feedback.
📊 Content Depth
7/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Template comparison pagesIntegration directory pages
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of structured FAQ schema
• Thin landing pages for features
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-05

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time570 ms
Raw HTML Size459.0 KB
Visible Text Size160.4 KB

Performance & Speed

52/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

570 ms
Acceptable — room for improvement

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

2640
DOM nodes
459 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → private
  • ✓ CDN cache status → HIT
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
doubleclick.net
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

93/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.numerama.com/sitemap_index.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

344
internal links
28
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → fr-FR
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 61/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for numerama.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/numerama.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=numerama.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 139 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
61
Single-page score
-2
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
59
Avg across 139 pages · Range 0–67
Topical Cohesion
8%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
141723
Avg Bloat
38.2×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.numerama.com/tech/78-adrenalin-et-son-createur-s-offrent-a-ratiatum.html
Adrenalin et son créateur s'offrent à Ratiatum - Numerama
pricing 67 25.2× 1800 💰 Pricing
https://www.numerama.com/tech/41-dossier-etude-de-la-charge-des-reseaux-edonkey.html
DOSSIER : Etude de la charge des réseaux eDonkey - Numerama
pricing 67 26.3× 1724 💰 Pricing
https://www.numerama.com/tech/93-interview-petar-maymounkov-varvar.html
INTERVIEW : Petar Maymounkov (VARVAR) - Numerama
pricing 67 26.4× 1719 💰 Pricing
https://www.numerama.com/tech/96-interview-bierbaron-ed2kutils.html
INTERVIEW : BierBaron (ED2KUtils) - Numerama
pricing 67 27.0× 1721 💰 Pricing
https://www.numerama.com/tech/73-winmx-30-beta-12.html
WinMX 3.0 Beta 12 - Numerama
pricing 64 47.1× 921 💰 Pricing
https://www.numerama.com/tech/75-sortie-de-la-version-finale-de-winmx-31.html
Sortie de la version finale de WinMX 3.1 ! - Numerama
pricing 64 38.9× 1140 💰 Pricing
https://www.numerama.com/tech/76-daemon-tools-v311.html
Daemon Tools v.3.11 - Numerama
pricing 64 47.4× 912 💰 Pricing
https://www.numerama.com/tech/17-p2philo-parce-que-c-est-aussi-ca-le-peer-to-peer.html
P2Philo : parce que c'est aussi ça le peer-to-peer - Numerama
pricing 64 34.6× 1286 💰 Pricing
https://www.numerama.com/tech/12-a-noter-edonkey-351660.html
A noter : eDonkey 35.16.60 - Numerama
pricing 64 41.5× 1091 💰 Pricing
https://www.numerama.com/tech/27-gateway-se-bat-pour-les-droits-de-la-copie.html
Gateway se bat pour les droits de la copie - Numerama
pricing 64 38.1× 1162 💰 Pricing
https://www.numerama.com/tech/42-y-a-t-il-une-vie-apres-le-bot.html
Y a t-il une vie après le bot ? - Numerama
pricing 64 38.8× 1142 💰 Pricing
https://www.numerama.com/tech/43-enquete-du-gardian-sur-la-police-anti-piratage.html
Enquête du Gardian sur la police anti-piratage - Numerama
pricing 64 36.4× 1225 💰 Pricing
https://www.numerama.com/tech/48-le-tres-attendu-npdonkey-040-enfin-disponible.html
Le très attendu NPDonkey 0.4.0 enfin disponible - Numerama
pricing 64 36.0× 1237 💰 Pricing
https://www.numerama.com/tech/72-la-sortie-d-edonkeybot-pro-est-confirmee.html
La sortie d'eDonkeyBot Pro est confirmée - Numerama
pricing 64 38.7× 1147 💰 Pricing
https://www.numerama.com/tech/95-les-createurs-de-winamp-opposes-au-mp3pro-et-wma.html
les créateurs de Winamp opposés au mp3pro et WMA - Numerama
pricing 64 39.2× 1130 💰 Pricing
https://www.numerama.com/tech/97-edonkey-1660-en-francais.html
eDonkey 16.60 en français - Numerama
pricing 64 46.7× 941 💰 Pricing
https://www.numerama.com/tech/98-la-riaa-traine-audiogalaxy-devant-les-juges.html
La RIAA traine Audiogalaxy devant les juges - Numerama
pricing 64 42.1× 1052 💰 Pricing
https://www.numerama.com/tech/105-le-grand-retour-de-xolox-enfin-accessible-au-public.html
Le grand retour de Xolox enfin accessible au public - Numerama
pricing 64 38.8× 1144 💰 Pricing
https://www.numerama.com/tech/106-l-union-europeenne-vote-la.html
L'Union Européenne vote la - Numerama
pricing 64 41.2× 1069 💰 Pricing
https://www.numerama.com/tech/120-precisions-sur-les-raisons-de-l-arret-de-slug.html
Précisions sur les raisons de l'arrêt de SLUG - Numerama
pricing 64 37.0× 1202 💰 Pricing
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/tech/ 128 64 0% 40.8× High JS Bloat
/pop-culture/ 2 64 0% 43.0× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/blog/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/about/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 139 pages
flipboard.com ×129
go.numerama.com ×129
bsky.app ×129
youtube.com ×129
twitter.com ×129
threads.net ×129
instagram.com ×129
x.com ×129
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/numerama.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to numerama.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
numerama.com (this site) 61 71 WordPress 2.9× 1
tokk-kansai.jp 85 90 WordPress 2.5× 1 Compare →
profitserver.ru 86 90 WordPress 3.8× 2 Compare →
profitserver.net 86 90 WordPress 3.8× 2 Compare →
driphydration.com 86 95 WordPress 1.9× 2 Compare →
hi-ad.jp 86 90 WordPress 3.1× 5 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite numerama.com when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to numerama.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Numerama?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Numerama does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Numerama work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Numerama."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for numerama.com:

Current Score
71
Projected Score
74
Improvement
+3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →