oda.com 56 D
🛡️ SEO 25 🤖 GEO 63 ⚡ Perf 47 🏗️ Arch 100

oda.com — Global SEODiff Score 56/100

oda.com
📊

At 75/100, the ACRI for oda.com indicates strong fundamentals in AI extractability, surpassing the majority of indexed sites. Compared to other infrastructure sites (avg score: 57), oda.com performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. A 50.0× token bloat ratio means crawlers must process significantly more tokens to reach the actual content — a drag on extraction efficiency. Zero schema blocks puts this site at a disadvantage in knowledge graph and AI-answer pipelines that rely on explicit structured data. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

56
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Traditional SEO (25) has the most room for improvement.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (89×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 20, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 5 snapshots
Mar 2 Mar 20
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 17 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 12 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than oda.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)25 × 0.25 = 6.2
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)63 × 0.40 = 25.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)47 × 0.20 = 9.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)100 × 0.15 = 15.0
Weighted sum = 6.2 + 25.2 + 9.4 + 15.0
Global SEODiff Score = 56 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
64
Structure
avg 35
0
Schema
avg 9
70
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 7%
Rank #70868
+12 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 19%
Score 75/100

oda.com shows stronger AI visibility than traditional SEO ranking. Great AI foundation to build on. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why oda.com ranks here

Tech stackNext.js
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat50×+

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

25/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

63 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

97 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 8
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://oda.com/no/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → nb
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Oda
  • ✓ og:description — Norges største lavpris matbutikk på nett og mobil. Velg blant 8000 varer og, kjøp middagen med ett klikk og få matvarene levert på døra..
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

63/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
oda.com
52
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 64/100 — Good
Structured Elements 92 elements (92 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words759
Raw Density12.1%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

45
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability45/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (80/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

1%
🗑️ 99%
Useful Content (4.5 KB)Bloat (398.3 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio50×+ — Bloated

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage83 / 83 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 402.8 KB, but only 4.5 KB is text. 1% useful / 99% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (50×+) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 98.9% · SNR: 0.01 · Signal: 1153 / Noise: 101968 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of oda.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
This website offers a collection of affordable, ready-to-heat meal kits with a variety of international cuisines, providing convenient and budget-friendly
Target Audience
Busy individuals, families, and anyone looking for easy and affordable meal solutions, including students and those seeking convenient dinner options.
Pricing Model
Subscription-based model with individual meal kits priced from approximately 23-40 NOK per portion, with larger packages and frozen options available at varying prices.
🏆 Competitive Moat
Low prices and convenience combined with a wide selection of meal options and a focus on easy preparation.
📊 Content Depth
6/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Recipe-focused contentProduct comparison tablesClear pricing information
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Limited SEO signals beyond recipe content
• Lack of integration with food delivery services
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-04

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkNext.js
AI-Readiness Score70/100
Server
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1317 ms
Raw HTML Size402.8 KB
Visible Text Size4.5 KB

Performance & Speed

47/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1317 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1186
DOM nodes
403 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → private, no-cache, no-store, max-age=0, must-revalidate
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

100/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://oda.com/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

126
internal links
5
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → nb
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 52/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for oda.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/oda.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=oda.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 64 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
52
Single-page score
-8
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
44
Avg across 64 pages · Range 0–58
Topical Cohesion
11%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
31897
Avg Bloat
192.3×
RAG Fractures [?]
54
⚠️
54 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 54 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://oda.com/no/about/billige-middagstips/
Billige middagstips!
pricing 58 165.6× 805 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://oda.com/no/about/vare-beste-hemmeligheter/
Våre beste hemmeligheter med TINE
pricing 58 150.7× 865 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://oda.com/no/about/alt-til-farsdag/
Alt til farsdag!
pricing 58 162.1× 1123 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://oda.com/no/about/hev-smaken-pa-asiatiske-retter-i-host/
Hev smaken på asiatiske retter i høst
pricing 58 184.6× 578 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://oda.com/no/about/halal/
Halal
pricing 58 208.5× 633 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://oda.com/no/about/hjemlevering-oslo/
Matlevering i Oslo – Få dagligvarer levert hjem | Oda
pricing 58 136.9× 623 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://oda.com/no/about/6-middagstips/
6 gode middagstips!
pricing 58 169.7× 517 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://oda.com/no/about/fruktkurv/
Fruktkurv
pricing 58 166.8× 694 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://oda.com/no/about/villbrygg/
Villbrygg
pricing 58 88.0× 1040 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://oda.com/no/about/middagstips-middag-for-to/
Middag for to - enkle middagstips og oppskrifter - Oda
pricing 58 159.0× 567 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://oda.com/no/about/middagstips-middag-for-en/
Middag for én - middagstips til deg som er alene - Oda
pricing 58 144.8× 611 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://oda.com/no/about/sommerskolen/
Sommerskolen
pricing 58 125.3× 1873 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://oda.com/no/about/helios/
Helios
pricing 58 179.8× 1448 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://oda.com/no/about/dette-kan-du-spise-nar-du-er-gravid/
Dette kan du spise når du er gravid
pricing 58 146.9× 652 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://oda.com/no/about/middagstips-helgemiddag/
Middagstips helgekos - oppskrifter på taco og pizza - Oda
pricing 58 158.4× 619 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://oda.com/no/about/fa-helgen-pa-dora/
Få helgen på døra
pricing 58 131.9× 1762 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://oda.com/no/about/jomjom/
Nyhet! Dyrefôr i kraft av kjærlighet.
pricing 58 157.7× 560 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://oda.com/no/about/norske-ravarer-i-sesong/
Norske råvarer i sesong
pricing 58 153.9× 1296 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://oda.com/no/about/coca-cola/
Coca-Cola
pricing 58 196.7× 538 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://oda.com/no/about/c-soaps/
C Soaps
pricing 58 74.0× 1355 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
Showing 20 of 64 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/no/ 54 52 1% 227.9× Bot Blocked
/about/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/contact/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/blog/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 64 pages
helsenorge.no ×54
play.google.com ×54
careers.oda.com ×54
oda.systems ×54
apps.apple.com ×54
sustainability.oda.com ×54
dmp.no ×54
hjelp.oda.com ×3
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/oda.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to oda.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
oda.com (this site) 52 75 Next.js 89.4× 0
sylvane.com 77 88 Next.js 6.7× 2 Compare →
justcalendars.com.au 77 86 Next.js 8.6× 4 Compare →
stil-ambiente.de 77 84 Next.js 5.6× 5 Compare →
bikeathletic.com 77 97 Next.js 21.0× 21 Compare →
downloadsource.net 77 80 Custom / Proprietary 1.8× 0 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite oda.com when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to oda.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Oda",
  "url": "https://oda.com",
  "logo": "https://oda.com/favicons/oda/favicon.png?v=4",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Oda",
  "url": "https://oda.com",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://oda.com/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 1% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Oda?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Oda does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Oda work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Oda."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for oda.com:

Current Score
75
Projected Score
93
Improvement
+18 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →