pff.com 72 B
🛡️ SEO 67 🤖 GEO 80 ⚡ Perf 59 🏗️ Arch 76

pff.com — Global SEODiff Score 72/100

pff.com
📊

pff.com shows strong AI visibility with an ACRI of 74/100, outperforming 78% of indexed domains. In the infrastructure sector, pff.com outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. A ghost ratio of 15% indicates a mixed rendering strategy where core content loads server-side but interactive sections rely on JavaScript. The 8.9× token bloat ratio falls within the normal range, though there is room to trim navigation, footer, and script overhead. The site includes 2 schema blocks, providing adequate structured data for basic entity recognition. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

72
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (59) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add HSTS header → +2 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 18, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 5 snapshots
Feb 23 Mar 18
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than pff.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)67 × 0.25 = 16.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)80 × 0.40 = 32.0
⚡ Performance (20% weight)59 × 0.20 = 11.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)76 × 0.15 = 11.4
Weighted sum = 16.8 + 32.0 + 11.8 + 11.4
Global SEODiff Score = 72 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
94
Rendering
avg 93
44
Structure
avg 35
44
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 2%
Rank #23933
+20 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 22%
Score 74/100

pff.com punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why pff.com ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage2 blocks
Token bloat8.9×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

67/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

36 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

148 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✗ Has <h2> headings — found 0
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.pff.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — NFL, Fantasy Football, and NFL Draft
  • ✓ og:description — The latest football news, analysis, and rankings from PFF. Featuring player grades, rankings and stats for the NFL, fantasy football, and NFL Draft.
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

80/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
pff.com
57
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 15%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 44/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 96 elements (96 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1655
Raw Density5.8%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks2 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

59
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability59/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

11%
🗑️ 89%
Useful Content (22.1 KB)Bloat (174.7 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio8.9× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context17% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage4 / 24 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Only 17% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 88.7% · SNR: 0.13 · Signal: 5669 / Noise: 44714 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of pff.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
PFF provides in-depth NFL analysis, grades, and data for fantasy football, the NFL Draft, and general NFL coverage, helping users evaluate players and teams.
Target Audience
NFL fans, fantasy football players, NFL Draft analysts, general managers, coaches, and scouts.
Pricing Model
Subscription-based with tiered pricing, including a free tier with limited access and premium tiers offering advanced features and data.
🔗 Integration Partners
Slack
🏆 Competitive Moat
Exclusive access to comprehensive NFL data, advanced analytics, and a robust draft scouting tool, providing a significant competitive advantage.
📊 Content Depth
8/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Template comparison pages
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of structured FAQ schema
• Thin landing pages for features
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-01

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time748 ms
Raw HTML Size196.8 KB
Visible Text Size22.1 KB

Performance & Speed

59/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

748 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1145
DOM nodes
197 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → max-age=0, private, must-revalidate
  • ✓ CDN cache status → DYNAMIC
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

76/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.pff.com/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

175
internal links
8
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 57/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for pff.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/pff.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=pff.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 113 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
57
Single-page score
+11
Subpages outperform homepage
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
68
Avg across 113 pages · Range 0–92
Topical Cohesion
9%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
193019
Avg Bloat
19.7×
RAG Fractures [?]
76
⚠️
76 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 76 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.pff.com/news/fantasy-football-assessing-every-nfl-rookie-class
Fantasy Football: Assessing every NFL team's rookie class
pricing 92 4.7× 7971 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.pff.com/news/predicting-fifth-year-option-decisions-for-the-2023-nfl-draft-class
Predicting fifth-year option decisions for the 2023 NFL Draft class
pricing 92 4.7× 7733 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-pff-101
PFF 101: The top 101 players from the 2025 NFL season
pricing 92 4.7× 7237 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.pff.com/news/draft-nfl-combine-primer-schedule-highest-graded-prospects-sleepers-big-board-rankings
NFL Combine Primer: Highest-graded prospects, sleepers, rankings and schedule
pricing 87 7.8× 4641 💰 Pricing
https://www.pff.com/news/draft-scouting-akheem-mesidor-with-great-talent-comes-great-concerns
Scouting Akheem Mesidor: With great talent comes great concerns
pricing 87 9.8× 1997 💰 Pricing
https://www.pff.com/news/fantasy-football-superflex-dynasty-rankings-top-200
2026 Superflex Dynasty Fantasy Football Rankings: Way-too-early top 200
pricing 87 9.0× 5327 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-highest-graded-rbs-from-the-2025-nfl-season-kenneth-walker-iii-comes-in-at-no-1
Highest-graded RBs from the 2025 NFL season: Kenneth Walker III comes in at No. 1
pricing 87 9.5× 2437 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.pff.com/news/highest-graded-tes-from-the-2025-nfl-season-george-kittle-reigns-supreme
Highest-graded TEs from the 2025 NFL season: George Kittle reigns supreme
pricing 87 8.9× 3267 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.pff.com/news/draft-2026-nfl-draft-pro-day-schedule-results-tracker
2026 NFL Draft: Pro day schedule and results tracker
pricing 87 7.1× 8665 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.pff.com/news/draft-2026-nfl-draft-wide-receivers-raised-lower-stock-transfers
2026 NFL Draft: Wide receivers who raised and lowered their stock after transferring
pricing 87 8.8× 3050 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.pff.com/news/2026-nfl-draft-the-ideal-haul-for-every-team-in-the-first-three-rounds
2026 NFL Draft: The ideal haul for every team in the first three rounds
pricing 87 6.7× 5269 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.pff.com/news/2026-franchise-tag-candidates-for-all-32-nfl-teams
2026 franchise tag candidates for all 32 NFL teams
pricing 87 8.2× 3922 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.pff.com/news/fantasy-football-top-5-risers-and-fallers-from-2026-nfl-coaching-changes
Fantasy Football: Top 5 risers and fallers from 2026 NFL coaching changes
pricing 87 8.9× 3061 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.pff.com/news/2025-pff-all-playoff-team-the-best-players-at-every-position-in-the-postseason
2025 PFF All-Playoff Team: The best players at every position in the postseason
pricing 87 8.1× 3808 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.pff.com/news/college-football-predicting-every-power-four-schools-next-quarterback-for-the-2026-season
Predicting every Power Four school’s next quarterback for the 2026 season
pricing 87 5.8× 4998 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.pff.com/news/fantasy-football-rankings-2026-top-100-tiered-running-backs
Fantasy Football Rankings 2026: Top 100 tiered running backs
pricing 87 8.6× 3677 💰 Pricing
https://www.pff.com/news/fantasy-football-idp-2026-rookie-linebacker-prospect-model
Fantasy Football IDP: 2026 rookie linebacker prospect model
pricing 87 9.6× 2245 💰 Pricing
https://www.pff.com/news/highest-graded-dls-from-the-2025-nfl-season-cameron-heyward-leads-the-list
Highest-graded interior defenders from the 2025 NFL season: Cameron Heyward leads the list
pricing 87 8.6× 2570 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-best-wide-receiver-on-each-route-in-2025
Best wide receiver on each route in 2025 
pricing 77 10.8× 1872 💰 Pricing
https://www.pff.com/news/highest-graded-tackles-from-the-2025-nfl-season-penei-sewell-leads-the-pack
Highest-graded tackles from the 2025 NFL season: Penei Sewell leads the pack
pricing 77 12.0× 2344 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/news/ 99 74 0% 20.3× High JS Bloat
/about/ 2 64 0% 26.2× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/draft/ 1 51 1% 41.0× Bot Blocked
/blog/ 1 69 0% 24.6× High JS Bloat
/jobs/ 1 41 1% 71.3× Bot Blocked
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/contact/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/fantasy/ 1 69 0% 26.0× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 113 pages
twitter.com ×105
subscribe.pff.com ×105
discord.gg ×105
b2b.pff.com ×105
instagram.com ×105
youtube.com ×105
sportsdata.io ×105
shop.pff.com ×105
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/pff.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to pff.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
pff.com (this site) 57 74 Custom / Proprietary 8.9× 2
rexlondontrade.com 82 86 Custom / Proprietary 2.7× 2 Compare →
ciawifi.ru 82 86 Custom / Proprietary 2.5× 2 Compare →
anatel.gov.br 82 86 Custom / Proprietary 2.3× 2 Compare →
ru.tophosts.net 82 90 Custom / Proprietary 1.4× 2 Compare →
tophosts.net 82 90 Custom / Proprietary 1.4× 2 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite pff.com when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to pff.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Pff?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Pff does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Pff work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Pff."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for pff.com:

Current Score
74
Projected Score
80
Improvement
+6 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →