prodesp.sp.gov.br 65 C
🛡️ SEO 74 🤖 GEO 69 ⚡ Perf 34 🏗️ Arch 82

prodesp.sp.gov.br — Global SEODiff Score 65/100

prodesp.sp.gov.br
📊

prodesp.sp.gov.br shows strong AI visibility with an ACRI of 74/100, outperforming 78% of indexed domains. In the ecommerce sector, prodesp.sp.gov.br outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. Token bloat registers at 13.9× — acceptable, but reducing inline scripts and redundant markup could yield measurable gains. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

65
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (34) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 8 snapshots
Feb 23 Mar 21
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
📉 Mar 21 ACRI -1 (52→51)
📈 Mar 18 ACRI +1 (51→52)
📈 Mar 13 ACRI +28 (23→51)
📈 Mar 13 ACRI +28 (23→51)
Does your site score higher than prodesp.sp.gov.br?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)74 × 0.25 = 18.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)69 × 0.40 = 27.6
⚡ Performance (20% weight)34 × 0.20 = 6.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)82 × 0.15 = 12.3
Weighted sum = 18.5 + 27.6 + 6.8 + 12.3
Global SEODiff Score = 65 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
23
Structure
avg 35
42
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 11%
Rank #108337
+12 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 22%
Score 74/100

prodesp.sp.gov.br shows stronger AI visibility than traditional SEO ranking. Great AI foundation to build on. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why prodesp.sp.gov.br ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
Industryecommerce
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat13.9×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

74/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

55 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

167 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 5
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.prodesp.sp.gov.br
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → pt-BR
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Prodesp - Site da empresa de TI do estado de São Paulo
  • ✓ og:description — Empresa de informática do Governo do Estado de São Paulo, a Prodesp desenvolve e implementa, para os diferentes órgãos estaduais, soluções de governo eletrônico
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

69/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the ecommerce sector, 24sevenmegastore.com (ACRI: 89) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
prodesp.sp.gov.br
51
Your ACRI Score
89
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. 24sevenmegastore.com has schema coverage of 4 blocks and uses Django. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 23/100 — Low
Structured Elements 14 elements (14 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words851
Raw Density1.6%
💡Low structure score (23/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 14 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

3/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

50
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability50/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

7%
🗑️ 93%
Useful Content (14.2 KB)Bloat (183.4 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio13.9× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context73% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage22 / 30 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 92.8% · SNR: 0.08 · Signal: 3630 / Noise: 46944 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of prodesp.sp.gov.br and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Prodesp is a WordPress-powered solution for managing customer relationships and sales.
Target Audience
Sales professionals, business owners, marketing teams
Pricing Model
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
🏆 Competitive Moat
WordPress-based CRM for SMBs
📊 Content Depth
3/10
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-13

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
ServerApache
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time6537 ms
Raw HTML Size197.6 KB
Visible Text Size14.2 KB

Performance & Speed

34/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

6537 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1169
DOM nodes
198 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

82/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

143
internal links
50
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → pt-BR
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 51/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for prodesp.sp.gov.br
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/prodesp.sp.gov.br" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=prodesp.sp.gov.br" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
51
Single-page score
-18
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
33
Avg across 10 pages · Range 33–33
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 51, but internal pages average only 33 — a -18-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Total Words
510
Avg Bloat
45.7×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://prodesp.sp.gov.br/pricing
Acessar ‹ Endomarketing – Prodesp — WordPress
pricing 33 45.7× 51 💰 Pricing
https://prodesp.sp.gov.br/about
Acessar ‹ Endomarketing – Prodesp — WordPress
about 33 45.7× 51
https://prodesp.sp.gov.br/products
Acessar ‹ Endomarketing – Prodesp — WordPress
product 33 45.7× 51
https://prodesp.sp.gov.br/features
Acessar ‹ Endomarketing – Prodesp — WordPress
product 33 45.7× 51
https://prodesp.sp.gov.br/blog
Acessar ‹ Endomarketing – Prodesp — WordPress
blog 33 45.7× 51
https://prodesp.sp.gov.br/docs
Acessar ‹ Endomarketing – Prodesp — WordPress
docs 33 45.7× 51
https://prodesp.sp.gov.br/case-studies
Acessar ‹ Endomarketing – Prodesp — WordPress
social-proof 33 45.8× 51
https://prodesp.sp.gov.br/faq
Acessar ‹ Endomarketing – Prodesp — WordPress
support 33 45.7× 51
https://prodesp.sp.gov.br/contact
Acessar ‹ Endomarketing – Prodesp — WordPress
support 33 45.7× 51
https://prodesp.sp.gov.br/integrations
Acessar ‹ Endomarketing – Prodesp — WordPress
integrations 33 45.8× 51
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/integrations/ 1 33 1% 45.8× Bot Blocked
/about/ 1 33 1% 45.7× Bot Blocked
/products/ 1 33 1% 45.7× Bot Blocked
/features/ 1 33 1% 45.7× Bot Blocked
/pricing/ 1 33 1% 45.7× Bot Blocked
/docs/ 1 33 1% 45.7× Bot Blocked
/blog/ 1 33 1% 45.7× Bot Blocked
/case-studies/ 1 33 1% 45.8× Bot Blocked
/contact/ 1 33 1% 45.7× Bot Blocked
/faq/ 1 33 1% 45.7× Bot Blocked
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
endomarketing.prodesp.sp.gov.br ×10
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/prodesp.sp.gov.br

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar ecommerce Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to prodesp.sp.gov.br. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
prodesp.sp.gov.br (this site) 51 74 WordPress 13.9× 1
agahi.in 76 86 WordPress 4.0× 1 Compare →
notaiofacile.it 76 84 WordPress 3.4× 3 Compare →
matfel.pl 76 86 Express 9.9× 2 Compare →
findtape.com 76 80 Custom / Proprietary 6.1× 1 Compare →
renta.papy.co.jp 76 80 Custom / Proprietary 6.0× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite prodesp.sp.gov.br when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to prodesp.sp.gov.br. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 7% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Gov?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Gov does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Gov work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Gov."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for prodesp.sp.gov.br:

Current Score
74
Projected Score
82
Improvement
+8 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →