qikio.com.au 73 B
🛡️ SEO 53 🤖 GEO 78 ⚡ Perf 80 🏗️ Arch 82

qikio.com.au — Global SEODiff Score 73/100

qikio.com.au
📊

With a solid 72/100 ACRI, qikio.com.au is well-positioned for AI search — better than 73% of sites in the Radar. In the infrastructure sector, qikio.com.au outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The low ghost ratio (5%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. A tight 3.6× token bloat ratio reflects disciplined markup: minimal noise between the crawler and the content it needs. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

73
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (53) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 6 snapshots
Feb 23 Mar 21
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than qikio.com.au?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)53 × 0.25 = 13.2
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)78 × 0.40 = 31.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)80 × 0.20 = 16.0
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)82 × 0.15 = 12.3
Weighted sum = 13.2 + 31.2 + 16.0 + 12.3
Global SEODiff Score = 73 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
30
Structure
avg 35
42
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 50%+
Rank #668956
-39 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 27%
Score 72/100

qikio.com.au ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 50%+) than in AI search (Top 27%). This is the 'Visibility Gap' pattern — implementing the recommendations above can help close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why qikio.com.au ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat3.6×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

53/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

31 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

66 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 4
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 1
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✗ Canonical tag present
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-AU
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Qikio - Insurance, Quick Smart!
  • ✓ og:description — Bringing you quick, easy, customer-friendly and reliable solutions
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

78/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
qikio.com.au
52
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 30/100 — Low
Structured Elements 27 elements (27 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1026
Raw Density2.6%
💡Low structure score (30/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 27 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

1/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

64
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability64/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (10/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

27%
🗑️ 73%
Useful Content (13.1 KB)Bloat (34.5 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio3.6× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context75% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage9 / 12 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

35 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 72.6% · SNR: 0.38 · Signal: 3343 / Noise: 8844 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of qikio.com.au and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Qikio is an insurance distribution platform that partners with insurance providers to offer a streamlined online claims process and a
Target Audience
Customers seeking insurance coverage (car, home, travel, commercial, etc.), insurance brokers, and businesses requiring specialized insurance solutions.
Pricing Model
The platform’s pricing model is not explicitly stated, but it operates on a commission-based model through partnerships with insurance providers.
🏆 Competitive Moat
Qikio’s competitive advantage lies in its technology-driven claims process and its network of insurance partners, offering a convenient and comprehensive insurance experience.
📊 Content Depth
6/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Template comparison pagesFAQ schema
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of structured FAQ schema
• Thin landing pages for features
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-31

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
ServerVoyager
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time789 ms
Raw HTML Size47.6 KB
Visible Text Size13.1 KB

Performance & Speed

80/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

789 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

496
DOM nodes
48 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → no-cache, no-store, must-revalidate
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

82/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

67
internal links
12
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-AU
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 52/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for qikio.com.au
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/qikio.com.au" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=qikio.com.au" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
52
Single-page score
-5
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
48
Avg across 10 pages · Range 39–77
Topical Cohesion
1%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
2490
Avg Bloat
77.3×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://qikio.com.au/about
Qikio - Insurance, Quick Smart!
about 77 9.9× 1018
https://qikio.com.au/contact
Qikio - Insurance, Quick Smart!
pricing 67 10.8× 853 💰 Pricing
https://qikio.com.au/pricing
Qikio - Insurance, Quick Smart!
pricing 42 107.7× 52
https://qikio.com.au/features
Qikio - Insurance, Quick Smart!
product 42 107.7× 52
https://qikio.com.au/products
Qikio - Insurance, Quick Smart!
product 42 107.7× 52
https://qikio.com.au/blog
Qikio - Insurance, Quick Smart!
blog 42 38.1× 187
https://qikio.com.au/docs
Qikio - Insurance, Quick Smart!
docs 42 107.7× 52
https://qikio.com.au/case-studies
Qikio - Insurance, Quick Smart!
social-proof 42 107.7× 52
https://qikio.com.au/integrations
Qikio - Insurance, Quick Smart!
integrations 42 107.7× 52
https://qikio.com.au/faq
Qikio - Insurance, Quick Smart!
support 39 68.1× 120
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/blog/ 1 42 0% 38.1× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 42 0% 107.7× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 42 0% 107.7× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 42 0% 107.7× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 1 39 0% 68.1× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 67 0% 10.8× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 42 0% 107.7× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 42 0% 107.7× High JS Bloat
/integrations/ 1 42 0% 107.7× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 77 0% 9.9× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
addinsure.com ×10
instagram.com ×10
manageyourloans.com.au ×10
car.qikio.com.au ×10
facebook.com ×10
linkedin.com ×10
compareandconnect.com.au ×10
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/qikio.com.au

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to qikio.com.au. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
qikio.com.au (this site) 52 72 Custom / Proprietary 3.6× 1
heathrowtravelcare.co.uk 77 86 Custom / Proprietary 3.6× 1 Compare →
cs-online.su 77 85 Custom / Proprietary 3.4× 2 Compare →
webike.my 77 86 Custom / Proprietary 4.6× 2 Compare →
downloadsource.net 77 80 Custom / Proprietary 1.8× 0 Compare →
dalivo.de 77 80 Custom / Proprietary 1.7× 0 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite qikio.com.au when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to qikio.com.au. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Com",
  "url": "https://qikio.com.au",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://qikio.com.au/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Com?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Com does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Com work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Com."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for qikio.com.au:

Current Score
72
Projected Score
79
Improvement
+7 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →