rarbg.to 43 D
🛡️ SEO 18 🤖 GEO 39 ⚡ Perf 80 🏗️ Arch 46

rarbg.to — Global SEODiff Score 43/100

rarbg.to
📊

With a 51/100 ACRI, rarbg.to has a moderate AI visibility profile — functional but not yet optimized for AI crawlers. The elevated 50% ghost ratio means AI crawlers that don't execute JavaScript may miss substantial amounts of page content. The 6.7× token bloat ratio falls within the normal range, though there is room to trim navigation, footer, and script overhead. The complete absence of JSON-LD schema is a missed opportunity: even basic Organization markup would improve how AI crawlers understand this domain. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

43
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Traditional SEO (18) has the most room for improvement.
🎯 Top Fix: Add Organization + WebSite JSON-LD → +5–8 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 20, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 3 snapshots
Mar 12 Mar 20
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
📈 Mar 18 ACRI +4 (18→22)
📉 Mar 12 ACRI -9 (27→18)
Does your site score higher than rarbg.to?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)18 × 0.25 = 4.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)39 × 0.40 = 15.6
⚡ Performance (20% weight)80 × 0.20 = 16.0
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)46 × 0.15 = 6.9
Weighted sum = 4.5 + 15.6 + 16.0 + 6.9
Global SEODiff Score = 43 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
65
Rendering
avg 93
0
Structure
avg 35
0
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 1%
Rank #12759
+57 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 58%
Score 51/100

rarbg.to punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why rarbg.to ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
Industry
RenderingCSR
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat6.7×

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

18/100 25 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

📝 Title Tag

8 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

0 chars
Missing

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✗ Has <h2> headings — found 0
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✗ Canonical tag present
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✗ Meta viewport set
  • ✗ HTML lang attribute
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✗ og:title
  • ✗ og:description
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

39/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

👻
Shadow Content Detected: 50% of your page token budget is in non-rendered regions (JavaScript-dependent content that AI crawlers may not process). Combined with 6.7x token bloat, AI models are using most of their context window on noise instead of your real content. This dramatically increases hallucination probability — models fill the gap with made-up facts.
Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 50%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Partially JS-Dependent
Rendering Type CSR
💡High ghost ratio means AI crawlers may miss content. Consider server-side rendering (SSR) or pre-rendering for critical pages.

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 0/100 — Poor
Structured Elements 0 elements (0 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words9
Raw Density0.0%
💡Low structure score (0/100). Very little extractable text detected (9 words). AI crawlers may be blocked from accessing the real page content — check the Ghost Ratio and Bot Access sections.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

31
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability31/100 — AI models can barely extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (10/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

14%
🗑️ 86%
Useful Content (155 B)Bloat (881 B)
Token Bloat Ratio6.7× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual ContextNo images detected
Image Alt Coverage0 / 0 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 85.3% · SNR: 0.17 · Signal: 38 / Noise: 221 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
ServerApache
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time971 ms
Raw HTML Size1.0 KB
Visible Text Size155 B

Performance & Speed

80/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

971 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

10
DOM nodes
1 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

46/100 15 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

1
internal links
0
external links
Very few internal links — crawlers may miss important pages

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✗ HTML lang attribute
  • ✗ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 22/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for rarbg.to
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/rarbg.to" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=rarbg.to" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 21 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
22
Single-page score
+35
Subpages outperform homepage
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
57
Avg across 21 pages · Range 57–57
Total Words
2121
Avg Bloat
7.4×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://rarbg.to/api
RARBG
docs 57 7.3× 101
https://rarbg.to/pricing
RARBG
pricing 57 7.6× 101
https://rarbg.to/guides
RARBG
blog 57 7.3× 101
https://rarbg.to/about
RARBG
about 57 7.6× 101
https://rarbg.to/resources
RARBG
blog 57 7.3× 101
https://rarbg.to/help
RARBG
support 57 7.3× 101
https://rarbg.to/solutions
RARBG
product 57 7.3× 101
https://rarbg.to/products
RARBG
product 57 7.6× 101
https://rarbg.to/features
RARBG
product 57 7.6× 101
https://rarbg.to/docs
RARBG
docs 57 7.6× 101
https://rarbg.to/blog
RARBG
blog 57 7.6× 101
https://rarbg.to/case-studies
RARBG
social-proof 57 7.6× 101
https://rarbg.to/get-started
RARBG
conversion 57 7.3× 101
https://rarbg.to/demo
RARBG
conversion 57 7.3× 101
https://rarbg.to/integrations
RARBG
integrations 57 7.6× 101
https://rarbg.to/support
RARBG
support 57 7.3× 101
https://rarbg.to/faq
RARBG
support 57 7.6× 101
https://rarbg.to/contact
RARBG
support 57 7.6× 101
https://rarbg.to/trust
RARBG
trust 57 7.3× 101
https://rarbg.to/security
RARBG
trust 57 7.3× 101
Showing 20 of 21 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/trust/ 1 57 0% 7.3× High JS Bloat
/security/ 1 57 0% 7.3× High JS Bloat
/careers/ 1 57 0% 7.3× High JS Bloat
/integrations/ 1 57 0% 7.6× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 57 0% 7.6× High JS Bloat
/solutions/ 1 57 0% 7.3× High JS Bloat
/help/ 1 57 0% 7.3× High JS Bloat
/resources/ 1 57 0% 7.3× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 57 0% 7.6× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 57 0% 7.6× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 57 0% 7.6× High JS Bloat
/api/ 1 57 0% 7.3× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 57 0% 7.6× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 1 57 0% 7.6× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 57 0% 7.6× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 21 pages
carelessnurse.com ×11
go.mavrtracktor.com ×10
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/rarbg.to

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to rarbg.to. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
rarbg.to (this site) 22 51 Custom / Proprietary 6.7× 0
wordmint.com 32 60 Custom / Proprietary 5.1× 1 Compare →
hayesmedia.org 32 60 Custom / Proprietary 2.3× 0 Compare →
mywap.org 32 60 Custom / Proprietary 2.1× 0 Compare →
geek23.com 32 60 Custom / Proprietary 2.1× 0 Compare →
vastiptest.com 32 60 Custom / Proprietary 1.0× 0 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite rarbg.to when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🎭

Bait & Switch Delta

A 10 PAGES

Compares your homepage rendering quality with inner pages. A high drift score means AI crawlers see a polished homepage but degraded inner content — the "bait & switch" that erodes trust.

57
Homepage ACRI
57
Inner Avg ACRI
0
ACRI Delta
0%
Homepage Ghost
0%
Inner Avg Ghost
0
Drift Score [?]
Worst Inner Pages
57 0% about https://rarbg.to/about
57 0% product https://rarbg.to/products
57 0% product https://rarbg.to/features
🛡️

E-E-A-T Trust Signals

D 30/100

Trust indicators extracted from surface pages. These signals help AI systems verify your site's Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness.

Physical Address
Phone Number
Email Contact
About Page
Contact Page
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Named Leadership
🔗

Citation Profile

1 DOMAINS

Outbound citation patterns across surface-crawled pages. Sites that cite diverse, authoritative sources signal higher E-E-A-T to AI systems.

10
Total Links
1
Unique Domains
1.0
Avg/Page
10%
Diversity
go.mavrtracktor.com
🏘️ Outbound Neighborhood Trust Avg Trust: 0.0

AI trust scores for the domains rarbg.to links to. Citing high-trust sources lifts your own credibility signal.

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to rarbg.to. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Rarbg",
  "url": "https://rarbg.to",
  "logo": "https://rarbg.to/logo.png",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Rarbg",
  "url": "https://rarbg.to",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://rarbg.to/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Fix Client-Side Rendering
High Impact ⏱ 2–4 hrs
50% of your content is behind client-side JavaScript and may not be accessible to AI crawlers. Wrap critical content in server-rendered HTML using your framework.
html
<!-- Ensure main content is in the initial HTML response -->
<main id="content">
  <!-- Server-rendered content goes here -->
  <h1>Rarbg</h1>
  <p>Your key content should render without JavaScript.</p>
  <!-- Move <script> tags to the bottom of <body> -->
</main>

<!-- In your framework config, enable SSR/prerendering: -->
<!-- your framework -->
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for rarbg.to:

Current Score
51
Projected Score
74
Improvement
+23 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Fix client-side rendering +10 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →