rb.cz 57 D
🛡️ SEO 39 🤖 GEO 61 ⚡ Perf 39 🏗️ Arch 100

rb.cz — Global SEODiff Score 57/100

rb.cz
📊

With a solid 74/100 ACRI, rb.cz is well-positioned for AI search — better than 78% of sites in the Radar. Within the social vertical, this places rb.cz above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. A ghost ratio of 30% indicates a mixed rendering strategy where core content loads server-side but interactive sections rely on JavaScript. Heavy markup overhead (29.1× bloat) forces AI systems to wade through excess code before finding useful information. No structured data was detected, which means AI systems must infer all entities and relationships from raw HTML alone. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

57
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Traditional SEO (39) has the most room for improvement.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (29×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 19, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 3 snapshots
Mar 4 Mar 19
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 19 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 14 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than rb.cz?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)39 × 0.25 = 9.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)61 × 0.40 = 24.4
⚡ Performance (20% weight)39 × 0.20 = 7.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)100 × 0.15 = 15.0
Weighted sum = 9.8 + 24.4 + 7.8 + 15.0
Global SEODiff Score = 57 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
84
Rendering
avg 93
94
Structure
avg 35
0
Schema
avg 9
40
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 6%
Rank #61407
+16 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 22%
Score 74/100

rb.cz punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why rb.cz ranks here

Tech stackAngular
Industrysocial
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat29.1×

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

39/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

34 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

203 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 3
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 2
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.rb.cz/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → cs
  • ✅ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Domovská stránka| Raiffeisenbank
  • ✓ og:description — Raiffeisenbank – moderní a bezpečné bankovnictví. Účty, půjčky, hypotéky i investice vyřídíte kdykoliv a kdekoliv. Spravujte finance jednoduše v mobilní aplikaci Raiffeisen bankovnictví.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

61/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the social sector, martin-sad.ru (ACRI: 87) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
rb.cz
60
Your ACRI Score
87
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. martin-sad.ru has schema coverage of 63 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

👻
Shadow Content Detected: 30% of your page token budget is in non-rendered regions (JavaScript-dependent content that AI crawlers may not process). Combined with 29.1x token bloat, AI models are using most of their context window on noise instead of your real content. This dramatically increases hallucination probability — models fill the gap with made-up facts.
Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 30%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 94/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 244 elements (244 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words926
Raw Density26.4%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

53
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability53/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (60/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

3%
🗑️ 97%
Useful Content (9.4 KB)Bloat (263.6 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio29.1× — Heavy

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage16 / 16 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 273.0 KB, but only 9.4 KB is text. 3% useful / 97% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (29.1×) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 96.6% · SNR: 0.04 · Signal: 2399 / Noise: 67479 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of rb.cz and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Raiffeisenbank provides a comprehensive suite of financial services, including banking accounts, loans, investments, and mortgages, catering to individual and corporate needs.
Target Audience
Retail customers, business owners, investors, and mortgage applicants.
Pricing Model
Variable; dependent on product and service selected (e.g., free accounts, loan interest rates, investment fees).
🔗 Integration Partners
RB keyEMIR
🛡️ Compliance Standards
EMIRGDPR
🏆 Competitive Moat
Strong brand recognition within Central and Eastern Europe, combined with a comprehensive product offering and established customer base.
📊 Content Depth
6/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Branch and ATMs searchCurrency rates searchAbout us search
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Limited SEO schema usage
• Lack of detailed product information on landing pages
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-03

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkAngular
AI-Readiness Score40/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time1393 ms
Raw HTML Size273.0 KB
Visible Text Size9.4 KB

Performance & Speed

39/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1393 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1578
DOM nodes
273 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → no-cache, no-store
  • ✓ CDN cache status → DYNAMIC
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

100/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.rb.cz/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

219
internal links
15
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → cs
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 60/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for rb.cz
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/rb.cz" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=rb.cz" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 70 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
60
Single-page score
-10
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
50
Avg across 70 pages · Range 0–72
Topical Cohesion
6%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
55121
Avg Bloat
47.1×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.rb.cz/en/about-us/about-raiffeisenbank/eticky-kodex-dodavatelu
Code of Conduct for Suppliers
pricing 72 16.7× 2182 💰 Pricing
https://www.rb.cz/bezpecne-bankovnictvi/firemni-podvody other 69 38.3× 1376
https://www.rb.cz/en/about-us/about-raiffeisenbank/bank-management pricing 67 23.4× 1561 💰 Pricing
https://www.rb.cz/en/corporate/transaction-banking/electronic-banking/internet-banking/faq
Frequently asked questions - internet banking for corporate clients | Raiffeisenbank
support 64 64.9× 546
https://www.rb.cz/en/personal/accounts/services-to-account/internet-banking/faq
Frequently asked internet banking questions | Raiffeisenbank
pricing 64 66.2× 533 💰 Pricing
https://www.rb.cz/bezpecne-bankovnictvi/bezpecnost-online-bankovnictvi
Bezpečnost online bankovnictví | Raiffeisenbank
other 64 45.3× 1180
https://www.rb.cz/bezpecne-bankovnictvi/dezinformace
Bezpečné bankovnictví - dezinformace | Raiffeisenbank
other 64 52.8× 822
https://www.rb.cz/bezpecne-bankovnictvi/finance-v-bezpeci
Finance v bezpečí | Raiffeisenbank
other 64 47.6× 887
https://www.rb.cz/bezpecne-bankovnictvi/phishing
Phishing | Raiffeisenbank
other 64 48.0× 1446
https://www.rb.cz/bezpecne-bankovnictvi/zasady-bezpecnosti-pouzivani-mobilniho-zarizeni
Zasady bezpečnosti používáni mobilního zařízení | Raiffeisenbank
other 64 38.5× 1102
https://www.rb.cz/en/about-us/about-raiffeisenbank/profil-a-historie-reiffeseinbank-v-cr
Information about Raiffeisenbank CZ | Raiffeisenbank
pricing 64 56.6× 534 💰 Pricing
https://www.rb.cz/bezpecne-bankovnictvi/aktualizace-certifikatu-ekomunikator
Aktualizace certifikátů eKomunikátor | Raiffeisenbank
other 64 55.2× 740
https://www.rb.cz/bezpecne-bankovnictvi/bezpecnost-platebnich-karet
Bezpečnost platebních karet | Raiffeisenbank
other 64 46.9× 913
https://www.rb.cz/bezpecne-bankovnictvi/postup-pro-overeni-komunikace
Postup pro ověření komunikace | Raiffeisenbank
pricing 64 39.1× 1085 💰 Pricing
https://www.rb.cz/bezpecne-bankovnictvi/bezpecna-aplikace/ios other 64 35.2× 1635
https://www.rb.cz/bezpecne-bankovnictvi/bezpecnost-internetoveho-bankovnictvi
Bezpečnost online bankovnictví | Raiffeisenbank
other 64 45.3× 1180
https://www.rb.cz/bankovni-identita
Bankovní identita | Raiffeisenbank
other 64 38.8× 1565
https://www.rb.cz/bezpecne-bankovnictvi
Bezpečné bankovnictví | Raiffeisenbank
other 64 34.8× 1636
https://www.rb.cz/bezpecne-bankovnictvi/bezpecnost-mobilniho-bankovnictvi
Bezpečnost online bankovnictví | Raiffeisenbank
other 64 45.3× 1180
https://www.rb.cz/bezpecne-bankovnictvi/bezpecna-aplikace other 64 35.2× 1634
Showing 20 of 70 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/bezpecne-bankovnictvi/ 25 62 0% 44.0× High JS Bloat
/en/ 11 59 0% 62.5× High JS Bloat
/bankovni-identita/ 8 57 0% 51.9× High JS Bloat
/affiliate/ 8 54 0% 77.0× High JS Bloat
/deeplinks/ 4 56 0% 59.3× High JS Bloat
/bezbarier/ 2 56 0% 65.5× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/blog/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/dolozeni-prijmu/ 1 56 0% 55.6× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/about/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/activate/ 1 56 0% 56.1× High JS Bloat
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/rb.cz

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar social Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to rb.cz. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
rb.cz (this site) 60 74 Angular 29.1× 0
kvaclub.ru 81 90 WordPress 6.0× 1 Compare →
marigliano.net 81 90 WordPress 4.6× 1 Compare →
zeus02.angkakeramatjitu.com 81 87 WordPress 1.5× 1 Compare →
tokyoapartment.fpage.biz 81 84 WordPress 1.4× 1 Compare →
officesnapshots.com 81 84 WordPress 1.9× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite rb.cz when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to rb.cz. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Rb",
  "url": "https://rb.cz",
  "logo": "https://rb.cz/favicon.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Rb",
  "url": "https://rb.cz",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://rb.cz/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 3% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Rb?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Rb does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Rb work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Rb."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for rb.cz:

Current Score
74
Projected Score
92
Improvement
+18 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →