reclaim.ai 62 C
🛡️ SEO 57 🤖 GEO 62 ⚡ Perf 52 🏗️ Arch 85

reclaim.ai — Global SEODiff Score 62/100

reclaim.ai
📊

reclaim.ai scores 64/100 on the AI-Readiness Index, placing it in the middle tier of indexed domains — there is clear room for improvement. Within the infrastructure vertical, this places reclaim.ai above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The low ghost ratio (10%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. Heavy markup overhead (17.9× bloat) forces AI systems to wade through excess code before finding useful information. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

62
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (52) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 18, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 8 snapshots
Feb 23 Mar 18
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 16 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 10 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than reclaim.ai?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)57 × 0.25 = 14.2
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)62 × 0.40 = 24.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)52 × 0.20 = 10.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)85 × 0.15 = 12.8
Weighted sum = 14.2 + 24.8 + 10.4 + 12.8
Global SEODiff Score = 62 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
97
Rendering
avg 93
12
Structure
avg 35
2
Schema
avg 9
75
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 4%
Rank #44961
+43 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 47%
Score 64/100

reclaim.ai punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why reclaim.ai ranks here

Tech stackWebflow
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat17.9×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

57/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

39 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

163 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 18
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://reclaim.ai
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Reclaim – AI Calendar for Work & Life
  • ✓ og:description — Reclaim is an AI-powered app that creates 40% more time for teams — auto-schedule tasks, habits, meeting & breaks – free on Google Calendar & Outlook Calendar.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

62/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
reclaim.ai
38
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 10%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 12/100 — Poor
Structured Elements 11 elements (11 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words2714
Raw Density0.4%
💡Low structure score (12/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 11 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

1/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
✅ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

34
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability34/100 — AI models can barely extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (60/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

5%
🗑️ 95%
Useful Content (18.8 KB)Bloat (317.2 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio17.9× — Heavy

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context12% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage30 / 252 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Only 12% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 94.4% · SNR: 0.06 · Signal: 4801 / Noise: 81213 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of reclaim.ai and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Reclaim is an AI-powered scheduling tool that helps users and teams proactively protect focus time, schedule meetings efficiently, and optimize
Target Audience
Product teams, engineering teams, sales teams, marketing teams, HR teams, finance teams, executive assistants, and anyone seeking to improve their time management and productivity.
Pricing Model
Freemium, with paid tiers (Starter & Business) offering increasing features and capacity. Offers student, nonprofit, startup, and competitor discounts.
🔗 Integration Partners
SlackZoomTodoistAsanaJiraClickUpLinear
🏆 Competitive Moat
AI-powered sprint planning with real-time resource optimization and adaptive calendar management, providing a more proactive and intelligent scheduling experience than traditional tools.
📊 Content Depth
8/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Integration directory pagesTemplate comparison pagesBlog posts comparing to competitors (e.g., Calendly, Outlook Calendar)
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of structured FAQ schema
• Thin landing pages for features
• Need for proactive time management solutions
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-02

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWebflow
AI-Readiness Score75/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time600 ms
Raw HTML Size336.0 KB
Visible Text Size18.8 KB

Performance & Speed

52/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

600 ms
Acceptable — room for improvement

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1836
DOM nodes
336 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✓ CDN cache status → DYNAMIC
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

2
tracker scripts
2
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.comjs.hs-scripts.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

85/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://reclaim.ai/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

291
internal links
6
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 38/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for reclaim.ai
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/reclaim.ai" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=reclaim.ai" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 77 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
38
Single-page score
+25
Subpages outperform homepage
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
63
Avg across 77 pages · Range 0–85
Topical Cohesion
8%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
264714
Avg Bloat
15.4×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://reclaim.ai/blog/best-slack-apps
13 Best Slack Apps for Work in 2026 | ReclaimFrequently asked questions
pricing 85 10.0× 5140 💰 Pricing
https://reclaim.ai/blog/company-culture
What is Company Culture? 2026 Workplace Guide (12 Steps to Improve) | ReclaimCompany Culture - FAQ
pricing 85 9.2× 5727 💰 Pricing
https://reclaim.ai/blog/best-planner-apps
14 Best Planner Apps in 2026 – Organization & Productivity | ReclaimPlanner Apps - FAQ
pricing 85 8.3× 6538 💰 Pricing
https://reclaim.ai/blog/best-calendar-apps
9 Best Calendar Apps for 2026 | Reclaim
pricing 77 9.3× 5341 💰 Pricing
https://reclaim.ai/blog/calendly-vs-reclaim
Calendly vs. Reclaim.ai: Best AI Scheduling Link for Meetings (2026) | ReclaimCalendly vs. Reclaim.ai - FAQ
pricing 77 6.3× 9176 💰 Pricing
https://reclaim.ai/blog/calendly-alternatives
Top 15 Calendly Alternatives in 2026 | Reclaim
pricing 77 9.2× 6448 💰 Pricing
https://reclaim.ai/blog/best-sales-tools
The 16 Best Sales Tools in 2026 | Reclaim
pricing 77 7.2× 7569 💰 Pricing
https://reclaim.ai/blog/affiliate-marketing-programs
42 Best Affiliate Marketing Programs - Highest Paying for 2026 | Reclaim
pricing 77 6.9× 9510 💰 Pricing
https://reclaim.ai/blog/collaboration-platforms
12 Best Online Collaboration Platforms – 2026 Team Apps (Reviewed) | Reclaim
pricing 77 9.1× 5518 💰 Pricing
https://reclaim.ai/blog/clockwise-vs-reclaim
Clockwise vs. Reclaim.ai: Compare AI Calendar Alternatives (2026 Guide) | Reclaim
pricing 77 10.0× 4832 💰 Pricing
https://reclaim.ai/blog/akiflow-vs-reclaim
Akiflow vs. Reclaim.ai – AI Calendar Feature Comparison for 2026 | Reclaim
pricing 77 8.4× 6384 💰 Pricing
https://reclaim.ai/blog/context-switching
Context Switching: Why It Kills Productivity & How to Fix (2026 Guide) | ReclaimContext Switching – FAQ
pricing 77 9.1× 5548 💰 Pricing
https://reclaim.ai/blog/burnout-trends-report
Burnout Trends Report: 200+ Employee Stress Stats by Department | Reclaim
pricing 77 8.1× 6246 💰 Pricing
https://reclaim.ai/blog/calendar-heroes-megan-killion-founder-of-coven-cloud-mk-consulting
Calendar Heroes: Megan Killion, Founder of Coven Cloud & MK Consulting | Reclaim
pricing 77 8.1× 5865 💰 Pricing
https://reclaim.ai/blog/ai-meeting-assistants
Top 18 AI Meeting Assistants & Note Takers of 2026 | Reclaim
pricing 77 6.8× 8434 💰 Pricing
https://reclaim.ai/blog/369-method
What is the 369 Method? How the Manifestation Works (2026 Guide) | Reclaim369 Method - FAQ
pricing 75 12.7× 3799 💰 Pricing
https://reclaim.ai/blog/business-productivity
Top 12 Strategies to Improve Business Productivity (2026 Guide) | ReclaimBusiness Productivity – FAQ
pricing 75 11.2× 4342 💰 Pricing
https://reclaim.ai/blog/business-meeting
Business Meetings: The Definitive Guide for 2026 | ReclaimBusiness Meetings - FAQ
pricing 75 12.4× 3876 💰 Pricing
https://reclaim.ai/blog/board-meeting
How to Run a Board Meeting (2026 Guide + Template) | ReclaimHow to Run a Board Meeting - FAQ
pricing 75 12.3× 3933 💰 Pricing
https://reclaim.ai/blog/abundance-mindset
How to Develop an Abundance Mindset – 12 Steps (2026 Guide) | ReclaimAbundance Mindset - FAQ
pricing 75 10.3× 4915 💰 Pricing
Showing 20 of 77 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/blog/ 65 68 0% 14.1× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 5 58 0% 38.9× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 56 0% 35.8× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 56 0% 40.1× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 77 pages
app.reclaim.ai ×72
linkedin.com ×72
workspace.google.com ×72
help.reclaim.ai ×72
youtube.com ×71
status.reclaim.ai ×71
twitter.com ×71
instagram.com ×71
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/reclaim.ai

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to reclaim.ai. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
reclaim.ai (this site) 38 64 Webflow 17.9× 1
fabulousafter40.com 63 81 WordPress 15.0× 1 Compare →
ballorig.nl 63 80 WordPress 14.3× 2 Compare →
rentforevent.com 63 81 WordPress 11.9× 1 Compare →
khelostar247.com 63 77 Nuxt.js 9.9× 1 Compare →
boho-magic.com 63 78 Shopify 9.8× 0 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite reclaim.ai when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to reclaim.ai. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Reclaim",
  "url": "https://reclaim.ai",
  "logo": "https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/67859049c02d67b2cfcceebf/67859049c02d67b2cfccf4f0_favicon.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Reclaim",
  "url": "https://reclaim.ai",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://reclaim.ai/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 5% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for reclaim.ai:

Current Score
64
Projected Score
79
Improvement
+15 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →