researchsquare.com 39 F
🛡️ SEO 45 🤖 GEO 41 ⚡ Perf 80 🏗️ Arch 78

researchsquare.com — Global SEODiff Score 39/100

researchsquare.com
📊

researchsquare.com registers just 15/100 on the ACRI scale — a bottom-tier result indicating systemic AI visibility problems. Within the infrastructure vertical, this places researchsquare.com below the industry average of 57 —, indicating room for competitive improvement. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. A 11.8× bloat ratio is typical for sites in this tech tier — not wasteful, but streamlining could further boost extractability. Zero schema blocks puts this site at a disadvantage in knowledge graph and AI-answer pipelines that rely on explicit structured data. All major AI crawlers (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are restricted by robots.txt — the site has limited accessibility to AI search.

39
F — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Significant improvement opportunities. Start with AI Readiness (41).
🎯 Top Fix: Allow GPTBot + ClaudeBot in robots.txt → lift the score cap
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 17, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 4 snapshots
Feb 23 Mar 4
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than researchsquare.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)45 × 0.25 = 11.2
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)41 × 0.40 = 16.4
⚡ Performance (20% weight)80 × 0.20 = 16.0
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)78 × 0.15 = 11.7
Weighted sum = 11.2 + 16.4 + 16.0 + 11.7
⚠️ Fatal multiplier: All major AI bots blocked → ×0.5
Global SEODiff Score = 39 (F)
🚫
Gatekeeper Rule: Score cannot exceed 15. Both GPTBot and ClaudeBot are blocked in robots.txt. No major AI assistant can cite this site. Allow at least one major AI crawler to lift the cap. See Bot Access →
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
20
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
0
Structure
avg 35
0
Schema
avg 9
70
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 2%
Rank #19691
+66 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 67%
Score 15/100

researchsquare.com punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why researchsquare.com ranks here

Tech stackNext.js
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat11.8×

Fastest improvements

  • Allow GPTBot in robots.txt so AI crawlers can access your pages (see Crawl Access).
  • Allow ClaudeBot (many assistants rely on it) — blocking it often correlates with “AI invisibility.”
  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

45/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

22 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

105 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 3
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 1
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✗ Canonical tag present
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Home
  • ✓ og:description — Research Square is a preprint platform that makes research communication faster, fairer, and more useful.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

41/100 40 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
researchsquare.com
17
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Blocked
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Blocked
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Blocked
Google-Extended
Blocked
Googlebot
Allowed
💡GPTBot is blocked. To appear in ChatGPT citations, add Allow: / under User-agent: GPTBot in your robots.txt.
💡ClaudeBot is blocked. To be cited by Claude, allow ClaudeBot in robots.txt.

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 0/100 — Poor
Structured Elements 0 elements (0 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words267
Raw Density0.0%
💡Low structure score (0/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 0 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

33
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
Critical
Blocklist Risk
Extractability33/100 — AI models can barely extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (10/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskCritical — 4 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

8%
🗑️ 92%
Useful Content (1.9 KB)Bloat (20.5 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio11.8× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage8 / 8 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 91.5% · SNR: 0.09 · Signal: 485 / Noise: 5237 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkNext.js
AI-Readiness Score70/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time627 ms
Raw HTML Size22.4 KB
Visible Text Size1.9 KB

Performance & Speed

80/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

627 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

318
DOM nodes
22 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → private, no-cache, no-store, max-age=0, must-revalidate
  • ✓ CDN cache status → DYNAMIC
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

78/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.researchsquare.com/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✗ GPTBot allowed
  • ✗ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

52
internal links
9
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 17/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for researchsquare.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/researchsquare.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=researchsquare.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 119 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
17
Single-page score
+44
Subpages outperform homepage
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
62
Avg across 119 pages · Range 0–76
Topical Cohesion
4%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
457121
Avg Bloat
14.3×
RAG Fractures [?]
30
⚠️
30 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 30 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-64/v2
The Effect of Implementing an Aseptic Practice Bundle for Anaesthetists to Reduce Postoperative Infections. Protocol for a Stepped Wedge, Cluster Randomised, Multi-Site Trial. The Anaesthetists Be Cleaner (ABC) Study | Research Square
pricing 76 4.8× 10582 💰 Pricing
https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-54/v1
The effect of different concentrations of heparin sealing liquid on thrombosis after peripherally inserted Central Catheter catheterization in tumor patients (HEALTH): protocol for a prospective, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial | Research Square
blog 76 4.8× 6434
https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-7/v2
Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implants versus Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Treatment in Treating Patients with Retinal Vein Occlusion: A Meta-analysis | Research Square
pricing 74 6.0× 5374 💰 Pricing
https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-61/v1
Serial Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in a Patient with Hyperglycemia-Related Osmotic Demyelination Syndrome: A Case Report | Research Square
blog 74 8.4× 2115
https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-12/v2
Usefulness of Airway Scope for Intubation of Infants with Cleft Lip and Palate–Comparison with Macintosh Laryngoscope: A randomized controlled trial | Research Square
blog 74 7.9× 2934
https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-28/v1
Anesthetics to Prevent Lung Injury in Cardiac Surgery (APLICS): A protocol for a randomized, controlled trial | Research Square
pricing 74 6.3× 4890 💰 Pricing
https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-13/v2
Acute cerebral infarction in a patient with an epidural catheter after left upper lobe resection: A case report | Research Square
blog 74 10.0× 2063
https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-62/v1
Antithrombin Supplementation during Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Study Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial | Research Square
blog 74 6.4× 4720
https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-45/v2
Wernicke’s encephalopathy in a patient with severe acute pancreatitis after cholecystectomy and exploration of biliary tract | Research Square
blog 74 7.6× 2641
https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-30/v1
A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of Huang Qi Gui Zhi Wu Wu Tang granules in patients with rheumatoid arthritis | Research Square
blog 74 5.7× 4692
https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-65/v1
Expert panel process to optimise the design of a randomised controlled trial in chronic rhinosinusitis (the MACRO programme). | Research Square
blog 74 5.9× 5763
https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-56/v1
The REstart or STop Antithrombotics Randomised Trial (RESTART) after stroke due to intracerebral haemorrhage: statistical analysis plan for a randomised controlled trial | Research Square
blog 74 6.0× 5569
https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-38/v1
Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy (LAPOP), study protocol for a single center, non-blinded randomized controlled trial | Research Square
blog 74 8.6× 2596
https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-39/v1
Rigorous Reporting of Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomised Controlled Trials: Development of a Flow Diagram Template | Research Square
blog 74 7.4× 3371
https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-70/v1
Awareness of Glaucoma and Associated Factors among Adults in Sekela District, Northwest Ethiopia | Research Square
blog 74 8.4× 3762
https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-62/v2
Antithrombin Supplementation during Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Study Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial | Research Square
blog 74 6.1× 4994
https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-75/v1
Sanjin Tablets for Acute Uncomplicated Lower Urinary Tract Infection (Syndrome of Dampness-Heat in the Lower Jiao): Protocol for Randomized, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Parallel Control of Positive Drug, Multicentre Clinical Trial | Research Square
blog 74 6.3× 6185 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-5/v2
Binafuxi Granules in the treatment of common cold with heat syndrome based on traditional Uighur medicine: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial | Research Square
blog 74 6.3× 5074
https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-6/v2
RADIATE – Radial Dysplasia Assessment, Treatment and Aetiology: Protocol for the development of a core outcome set using a Delphi survey | Research Square
blog 74 7.1× 3420
https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-12/v1
Usefulness of Airway Scope for Intubation of Infants with Cleft Lip and Palate–Comparison with Macintosh Laryngoscope: A randomized controlled trial | Research Square
blog 74 8.5× 3094
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/article/ 108 66 0% 14.0× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 2 36 0% 46.3× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 39 0% 25.7× High JS Bloat
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/contact/ 1 36 0% 33.0× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 1 36 0% 33.0× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/researchsquare.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to researchsquare.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
researchsquare.com (this site) 17 15 Next.js 11.8× 0
whatculture.com 42 71 Next.js 5.0× 1 Compare →
iapp.org 42 71 Next.js 115.4× 0 Compare →
atlas.centrum.cz 42 66 Next.js 132.1× 1 Compare →
observer.co.uk 42 55 Next.js 295.3× 2 Compare →
matik.io 42 72 Webflow 11.4× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite researchsquare.com when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to researchsquare.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Researchsquare",
  "url": "https://researchsquare.com",
  "logo": "https://researchsquare.com/static/favicons/favicon.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Researchsquare",
  "url": "https://researchsquare.com",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://researchsquare.com/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Allow GPTBot in robots.txt
High Impact ⏱ 2 min
GPTBot is blocked — your content cannot appear in ChatGPT citations. Add this to your robots.txt:
text
User-agent: GPTBot
Allow: /

User-agent: ChatGPT-User
Allow: /
Allow ClaudeBot in robots.txt
Medium Impact ⏱ 2 min
ClaudeBot is restricted — Claude may not be able to cite your content. Many AI assistants rely on it.
text
User-agent: ClaudeBot
Allow: /

User-agent: anthropic-ai
Allow: /
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 8% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for researchsquare.com:

Current Score
15
Projected Score
46
Improvement
+31 pts
Allow GPTBot +8 pts
Allow ClaudeBot +5 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →