respond.io 69 C
🛡️ SEO 79 🤖 GEO 66 ⚡ Perf 54 🏗️ Arch 78

respond.io — Global SEODiff Score 69/100

respond.io
📊

respond.io achieves a 84/100 on the AI-Crawler Reality Index, reflecting above-average readiness for AI-driven discovery. Compared to other infrastructure sites (avg score: 57), respond.io performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Content is delivered server-side, meaning bots and AI agents can parse the full page without executing JavaScript. A 50.0× token bloat ratio means crawlers must process significantly more tokens to reach the actual content — a drag on extraction efficiency. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

69
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (54) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (77×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 20, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 3 snapshots
Mar 7 Mar 20
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than respond.io?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)79 × 0.25 = 19.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)66 × 0.40 = 26.4
⚡ Performance (20% weight)54 × 0.20 = 10.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)78 × 0.15 = 11.7
Weighted sum = 19.8 + 26.4 + 10.8 + 11.7
Global SEODiff Score = 69 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
43
Structure
avg 35
82
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 4%
Rank #41158
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 2%
Score 84/100

respond.io has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why respond.io ranks here

Tech stackAstro
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat50×+

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

79/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

68 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

167 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 8
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://respond.io/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✅ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Respond.io | #1 AI-Powered Customer Conversation Management Software
  • ✓ og:description — Trusted by 10,000+ B2C businesses to scale customer chats, calls & campaigns. Unify WhatsApp, TikTok, Instagram & Facebook in a team inbox with AI Agents on respond.io
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

66/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
respond.io
59
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 43/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 88 elements (88 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1572
Raw Density5.6%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ✅ Present
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

5/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
✅ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

59
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability59/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (85/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

1%
🗑️ 99%
Useful Content (10.9 KB)Bloat (829.9 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio50×+ — Bloated

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context69% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage83 / 121 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 840.8 KB, but only 10.9 KB is text. 1% useful / 99% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (50×+) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 98.7% · SNR: 0.01 · Signal: 2786 / Noise: 212466 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of respond.io and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Respond.io is an AI-powered platform designed to convert conversations into customers by providing marketing and sales tools for chat across various channels.
Target Audience
Sales and marketing teams, customer support agents, business owners, and companies seeking to improve customer engagement and lead generation.
Pricing Model
Not explicitly stated, but implied to be tiered based on features and usage, likely with a focus on scaling revenue.
🔗 Integration Partners
Meta (WhatsApp BSP)
🏆 Competitive Moat
Eight years of market leadership, preferred access to new features from platforms like Meta and TikTok, and AI-powered conversation management.
📊 Content Depth
7/10
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of tools to respond to customer inquiries on messaging apps
• Need for scalable conversation management solutions
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-02

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkAstro
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time550 ms
Raw HTML Size840.8 KB
Visible Text Size10.9 KB

Performance & Speed

54/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

550 ms
Acceptable — room for improvement

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1409
DOM nodes
841 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate, max-age=0
  • ✓ CDN cache status → HIT
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

78/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://respond.io/sitemap-index.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

131
internal links
7
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 59/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for respond.io
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/respond.io" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=respond.io" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 78 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
59
Single-page score
+4
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
64
Avg across 78 pages · Range 0–90
Topical Cohesion
14%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
127027
Avg Bloat
225.9×
RAG Fractures [?]
1
⚠️
1 RAG-Chunking Fracture Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 1 page will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://respond.io/vi/blog/whatsapp-ai-agent
Trợ lý AI trên WhatsApp: Rút ngắn thời gian phản hồi & Nâng cao năng suất đội ngũ
pricing 90 9.7× 4984 💰 Pricing
https://respond.io/vi/blog/chat-automation-for-scaling-b2c-businesses
How to Scale Chat Automation for Medium to Large B2C Teams
pricing 80 19.0× 2401 💰 Pricing
https://respond.io/ar/blog/chat-automation-for-scaling-b2c-businesses
How to Scale Chat Automation for Medium to Large B2C Teams
pricing 80 19.2× 2394 💰 Pricing
https://respond.io/it/blog/whatsapp-ai-agent
Agenti AI per WhatsApp: riduci i tempi di risposta e aumenta la produttività del team
pricing 80 13.5× 3442 💰 Pricing
https://respond.io/pt/blog/whatsapp-ai-agent
Agentes de IA do WhatsApp: Reduza o tempo de resposta & aumente a produtividade da equipe
pricing 80 13.4× 3460 💰 Pricing
https://respond.io/ru/blog/chat-automation-for-scaling-b2c-businesses
How to Scale Chat Automation for Medium to Large B2C Teams
pricing 80 19.3× 2399 💰 Pricing
https://respond.io/de/blog/whatsapp-ai-agent
WhatsApp KI‑Agenten: Reaktionszeit reduzieren & Teamproduktivität steigern}]}]}]}]},
pricing 80 15.9× 2929 💰 Pricing
https://respond.io/es/blog/whatsapp-ai-agent
Agentes IA de WhatsApp: reduce el tiempo de respuesta y aumenta la productividad del equipo.
pricing 80 13.0× 3606 💰 Pricing
https://respond.io/ru/blog/whatsapp-ai-agent
Агенты ИИ для WhatsApp: сократите время ответа и повысьте производительность команды
pricing 80 17.4× 2933 💰 Pricing
https://respond.io/blog/best-whatsapp-crm
7 Best WhatsApp CRM Systems: Features, Pricing & Ultimate Guide
pricing 80 11.0× 4568 💰 Pricing
https://respond.io/es/blog/best-whatsapp-crm
Las 6 mejores CRMs de WhatsApp en 2025: Compara pros, contras y precios
pricing 80 15.3× 3170 💰 Pricing
https://respond.io/ar/blog/best-whatsapp-crm
أفضل 6 أنظمة CRM لواتساب في 2025: قارن بين الإيجابيات والسلبيات والأسعار.
pricing 80 19.3× 2638 💰 Pricing
https://respond.io/id/blog/best-whatsapp-crm
6 CRM WhatsApp Terbaik di 2026: Bandingkan Kelebihan, Kekurangan & Harga
pricing 80 15.9× 2881 💰 Pricing
https://respond.io/it/blog/best-whatsapp-crm
6 migliori CRM WhatsApp nel 2025: confronta vantaggi, svantaggi e prezzi
pricing 80 15.7× 3076 💰 Pricing
https://respond.io/pt/blog/best-whatsapp-crm
6 melhores CRMs do WhatsApp em 2026: compare prós, contras e preços
pricing 80 14.0× 3294 💰 Pricing
https://respond.io/ru/blog/best-whatsapp-crm
6 лучших CRM для WhatsApp в 2026 году: сравнение плюсов, минусов и цен
pricing 80 17.4× 2910 💰 Pricing
https://respond.io/th/blog/chat-automation-for-scaling-b2c-businesses
How to Scale Chat Automation for Medium to Large B2C Teams
pricing 80 20.0× 2384 💰 Pricing
https://respond.io/vi/blog/best-whatsapp-crm
6 CRM WhatsApp tốt nhất trong năm 2025: So sánh ưu điểm, nhược điểm & giá
pricing 80 11.7× 4258 💰 Pricing
https://respond.io/fr/blog/best-whatsapp-crm
6 meilleurs CRM WhatsApp en 2026 : avantages, inconvénients et tarifs.
pricing 80 13.4× 3476 💰 Pricing
https://respond.io/fr/blog/whatsapp-ai-agent
Agents IA WhatsApp : réduis le temps de réponse et augmente la productivité de ton équipe.
pricing 80 12.6× 3730 💰 Pricing
Showing 20 of 78 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/es/ 6 70 0% 136.6× High JS Bloat
/tw/ 6 59 0% 425.2× High JS Bloat
/ar/ 6 70 0% 179.6× High JS Bloat
/zh/ 6 62 0% 430.4× High JS Bloat
/pt/ 5 69 0% 171.5× High JS Bloat
/ru/ 5 70 0% 205.1× High JS Bloat
/it/ 5 69 0% 165.6× High JS Bloat
/id/ 5 69 0% 188.8× High JS Bloat
/fr/ 5 69 0% 167.6× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 5 71 0% 160.4× High JS Bloat
/de/ 5 69 0% 204.4× High JS Bloat
/vi/ 5 72 0% 118.9× High JS Bloat
/th/ 5 65 0% 473.6× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 78 pages
youtube.com ×74
developers.respond.io ×74
t.me ×74
instagram.com ×74
play.google.com ×74
status.respond.io ×74
app.respond.io ×74
x.com ×74
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/respond.io

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to respond.io. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
respond.io (this site) 59 84 Astro 77.3× 1
multicanalatacado.com.br 84 92 Custom / Proprietary 1.3× 1 Compare →
salemmaonline.com.py 84 86 Custom / Proprietary 1.6× 2 Compare →
m2m-dmt.net 84 88 TYPO3 2.2× 2 Compare →
tv.rakuten.co.jp 84 89 Next.js 3.8× 3 Compare →
farmaciilenapofarm.ro 84 87 Custom / Proprietary 3.8× 3 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite respond.io when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to respond.io. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 1% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Respond?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Respond does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Respond work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Respond."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for respond.io:

Current Score
84
Projected Score
92
Improvement
+8 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →