riksarkivet.se 63 C
🛡️ SEO 44 🤖 GEO 58 ⚡ Perf 68 🏗️ Arch 100

riksarkivet.se — Global SEODiff Score 63/100

riksarkivet.se
📊

riksarkivet.se shows strong AI visibility with an ACRI of 74/100, outperforming 78% of indexed domains. Within the saas vertical, this places riksarkivet.se above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. A 50.0× token bloat ratio means crawlers must process significantly more tokens to reach the actual content — a drag on extraction efficiency. Zero schema blocks puts this site at a disadvantage in knowledge graph and AI-answer pipelines that rely on explicit structured data. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

63
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (44) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (63×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 4 snapshots
Mar 5 Mar 21
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 21 Content change detected
📉 Mar 16 ACRI -1 (45→44)
Does your site score higher than riksarkivet.se?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)44 × 0.25 = 11.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)58 × 0.40 = 23.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)68 × 0.20 = 13.6
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)100 × 0.15 = 15.0
Weighted sum = 11.0 + 23.2 + 13.6 + 15.0
Global SEODiff Score = 63 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
61
Structure
avg 35
0
Schema
avg 9
70
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 4%
Rank #36598
+19 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 22%
Score 74/100

riksarkivet.se punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why riksarkivet.se ranks here

Tech stackNext.js
Industrysaas
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat50×+

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

44/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

27 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

111 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 7
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✗ Canonical tag present
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → sv
  • ✅ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Välkommen till Riksarkivet
  • ✓ og:description — Riksarkivet bevarar samhällets arkivinformation för framtida generationer och ser till att den kan användas.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

58/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the saas sector, smahospital.jp (ACRI: 84) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
riksarkivet.se
44
Your ACRI Score
84
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. smahospital.jp has schema coverage of 1 blocks and uses Next.js. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 61/100 — Good
Structured Elements 40 elements (40 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words359
Raw Density11.1%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

45
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability45/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (60/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

1%
🗑️ 99%
Useful Content (2.7 KB)Bloat (165.8 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio50×+ — Bloated

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage6 / 6 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 168.5 KB, but only 2.7 KB is text. 1% useful / 99% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (50×+) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 98.4% · SNR: 0.02 · Signal: 687 / Noise: 42453 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of riksarkivet.se and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Riksarkivet preserves societal archive information for future use and accessibility.
Target Audience
Archiv users, researchers, historians, and the general public.
Pricing Model
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
🏆 Competitive Moat
Preservation and accessibility of national archives.
📊 Content Depth
3/10
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-02

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkNext.js
AI-Readiness Score70/100
Serveropenresty
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time827 ms
Raw HTML Size168.5 KB
Visible Text Size2.7 KB

Performance & Speed

68/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

827 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

494
DOM nodes
168 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → s-maxage=3600, stale-while-revalidate=31532400
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

100/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://riksarkivet.se/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

46
internal links
6
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → sv
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 44/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for riksarkivet.se
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/riksarkivet.se" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=riksarkivet.se" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 80 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
44
Single-page score
-10
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
35
Avg across 80 pages · Range 22–63
Topical Cohesion
13%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
16246
Avg Bloat
375.5×
RAG Fractures [?]
80
⚠️
80 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 80 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://riksarkivet.se/resurser/lagesbild-for-arkiv-och-beredskap
Lägesbild för arkiv och beredskap
pricing 63 14.6× 2246 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://riksarkivet.se/inlagg/kraftfulla-atgarder-behovs-for-att-skydda-kulturarvet
Kraftfulla åtgärder behövs för att skydda kulturarvet
pricing 52 39.2× 670 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://riksarkivet.se/inlagg/nordiskt-fokus-pa-samisk-dokumentation-i-arkiven
Nordiskt fokus på samisk dokumentation i arkiven
pricing 52 48.5× 540 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://riksarkivet.se/inlagg/sverige-och-ukraina-i-samarbete-for-att-skydda-samhallsviktig-information
Sverige och Ukraina i samarbete för att skydda samhällsviktig information
pricing 52 40.5× 666 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://riksarkivet.se/inlagg/nordiskt-forskningssamarbete-om-medeltida-skrivkultur
Nordiskt forskningssamarbete om medeltida skrivkultur
pricing 42 85.5× 303 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://riksarkivet.se/inlagg/slottsarkivet-atergar-till-kungl-hovstaterna
Slottsarkivet återgår till Kungl. Hovstaterna
pricing 42 72.0× 355 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://riksarkivet.se/inlagg/samhallsviktig-information-maste-sakras-innan-krisen-ar-har
Samhällsviktig information måste säkras – innan krisen är här
pricing 42 71.5× 389 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://riksarkivet.se/inlagg/karin-astrom-iko-avtackad
Karin Åström Iko avtackad
pricing 42 118.0× 207 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://riksarkivet.se/inlagg/ny-bok-om-byggnadsritningar
Ny bok om byggnadsritningar
pricing 42 110.1× 229 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://riksarkivet.se/evenemang/bokslapp-for-tva-nya-bocker-i-serien-det-medeltida-sverige
Boksläpp för två nya böcker i serien Det medeltida Sverige
pricing 42 95.1× 275 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://riksarkivet.se/inlagg/nya-i-nad-under-2025
Nya i NAD under 2025
pricing 42 95.0× 261 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://riksarkivet.se/evenemang/johan-tobias-sergel-skulptor-levnadskonstnar-och-brevskrivare
Johan Tobias Sergel – skulptör, levnadskonstnär och brevskrivare
pricing 42 125.0× 205 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://riksarkivet.se/inlagg/underhallsarbete-pa-webb-och-i-soktjanst
Underhållsarbete på webb och i söktjänst
pricing 42 59.3× 422 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://riksarkivet.se/inlagg/dags-att-foresla-varldsminnen-fran-sverige
Dags att föreslå världsminnen från Sverige!
pricing 42 75.5× 339 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://riksarkivet.se/inlagg/ny-bok-i-serien-det-medeltida-sverige
Ny bok i serien Det medeltida Sverige
pricing 42 119.4× 213 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://riksarkivet.se/inlagg/nu-kan-du-hitta-personer-fodda-1925-i-1930-ars-folkrakning
Nu kan du hitta personer födda 1925 i 1930 års folkräkning
pricing 42 122.3× 201 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://riksarkivet.se/inlagg/riksarkivets-yttrande-over-betankandet-en-kulturkanon-for-sverige
Riksarkivets yttrande över betänkandet En kulturkanon för Sverige
pricing 42 62.4× 418 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://riksarkivet.se/inlagg/arkivpodden-presenterar-folkets-kulturkanon
Arkivpodden presenterar folkets kulturkanon!
pricing 42 119.3× 212 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://riksarkivet.se/resurser/arkivpodden-folkets-kulturkanon-del-2-kebabpizza-text-tv-och-vastgotalagen
Arkivpodden – Folkets kulturkanon del 2 – Kebabpizza, Text-tv och Västgötalagen
pricing 42 170.2× 206 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://riksarkivet.se/resurser/arkivpodden-folkets-kulturkanon-kebabpizza-text-tv-och-vastgotalagen
Arkivpodden – Folkets kulturkanon del 1 – Kebabpizza, Text-tv och Västgötalagen
pricing 42 149.3× 241 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
Showing 20 of 80 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/inlagg/ 34 39 1% 135.7× Bot Blocked
/evenemang/ 24 33 1% 214.7× Bot Blocked
/projekt/ 4 34 1% 164.2× Bot Blocked
/resurser/ 4 45 1% 130.4× Bot Blocked
/arkivera-och-forvalta/ 3 35 1% 223.0× Bot Blocked
/docs/ 1 22 1% 1833.7× Bot Blocked
/case-studies/ 1 22 1% 1834.0× Bot Blocked
/blog/ 1 22 1% 1833.7× Bot Blocked
/contact/ 1 22 1% 1833.8× Bot Blocked
/en/ 1 32 1% 90.1× Bot Blocked
/pricing/ 1 22 1% 1833.8× Bot Blocked
/about/ 1 22 1% 1833.7× Bot Blocked
/integrations/ 1 22 1% 1834.0× Bot Blocked
/products/ 1 22 1% 1833.8× Bot Blocked
/faq/ 1 22 1% 1833.7× Bot Blocked
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 80 pages
linkedin.com ×80
instagram.com ×80
youtube.com ×80
facebook.com ×80
sok.riksarkivet.se ×80
event.paloma.se ×4
soundcloud.com ×3
foreskrifter.riksarkivet.se ×3
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/riksarkivet.se

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar saas Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to riksarkivet.se. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
riksarkivet.se (this site) 44 74 Next.js 62.8× 0
www3.ufmg.br 69 77 Next.js 2.5× 0 Compare →
iguzzini.com 69 84 Next.js 6.6× 2 Compare →
quiveutdufromage.com 69 85 Next.js 106.2× 7 Compare →
jianzhi8.com 69 82 Cloudflare Pages 3.8× 0 Compare →
hentaitube.online 69 81 Cloudflare Pages 6.7× 0 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite riksarkivet.se when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to riksarkivet.se. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Riksarkivet",
  "url": "https://riksarkivet.se",
  "logo": "https://riksarkivet.se/favicon.ico?favicon.61b0edb8.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Riksarkivet",
  "url": "https://riksarkivet.se",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://riksarkivet.se/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 1% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Riksarkivet?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Riksarkivet does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Riksarkivet work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Riksarkivet."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for riksarkivet.se:

Current Score
74
Projected Score
92
Improvement
+18 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →