rmf.fm 55 D
🛡️ SEO 21 🤖 GEO 73 ⚡ Perf 53 🏗️ Arch 68

rmf.fm — Global SEODiff Score 55/100

rmf.fm
📊

With a solid 65/100 ACRI, rmf.fm is well-positioned for AI search — better than 55% of sites in the Radar. The low ghost ratio (5%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. The 5.1× token bloat ratio falls within the normal range, though there is room to trim navigation, footer, and script overhead. No structured data was detected, which means AI systems must infer all entities and relationships from raw HTML alone. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

55
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Traditional SEO (21) has the most room for improvement.
🎯 Top Fix: Add Organization + WebSite JSON-LD → +5–8 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 29 snapshots
Mar 1 Mar 21
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 21 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 21 Content change detected
📉 Mar 20 ACRI -1 (45→44)
🔄 Mar 20 Content change detected
📈 Mar 19 ACRI +1 (44→45)
Does your site score higher than rmf.fm?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)21 × 0.25 = 5.2
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)73 × 0.40 = 29.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)53 × 0.20 = 10.6
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)68 × 0.15 = 10.2
Weighted sum = 5.2 + 29.2 + 10.6 + 10.2
Global SEODiff Score = 55 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
26
Structure
avg 35
0
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.9%
Rank #8758
+45 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 45%
Score 65/100

rmf.fm punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why rmf.fm ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
Industry
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat5.1×

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

21/100 25 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

📝 Title Tag

31 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

164 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 9
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✗ Canonical tag present
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → pl
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Radio RMF FM - Najlepsza muzyka
  • ✓ og:description — Radio numer 1 w Polsce! Największe i najpopularniejsze radio muzyczno-informacyjne. Zawsze najlepsza muzyka i najświeższe fakty. Posłuchaj radio przez internet.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

73/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 26/100 — Low
Structured Elements 18 elements (18 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words870
Raw Density2.1%
💡Low structure score (26/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 18 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

52
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability52/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

19%
🗑️ 81%
Useful Content (18.5 KB)Bloat (75.3 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio5.1× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context88% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage77 / 88 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 80.3% · SNR: 0.25 · Signal: 4741 / Noise: 19279 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of rmf.fm and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Radio RMF FM provides Polish music and news through an online radio stream.
Target Audience
Listeners of Polish music and news.
Pricing Model
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
🏆 Competitive Moat
Popularity and brand recognition as Poland's leading music and news radio.
📊 Content Depth
2/10
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-02-28

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Server
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1525 ms
Raw HTML Size93.8 KB
Visible Text Size18.5 KB

Performance & Speed

53/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1525 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

820
DOM nodes
94 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → public, max-age=60
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

68/100 15 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

119
internal links
38
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → pl
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 44/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for rmf.fm
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/rmf.fm" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=rmf.fm" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 22 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
44
Single-page score
-42
Severe hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
2
Avg across 22 pages · Range 0–52
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 44, but internal pages average only 2 — a -42-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Total Words
11
Avg Bloat
0.2×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://rmf.fm/security trust 52 3.4× 11
https://rmf.fm/pricing pricing 0 0.0× 0
https://rmf.fm/guides blog 0 0.0× 0
https://rmf.fm/resources blog 0 0.0× 0
https://rmf.fm/help support 0 0.0× 0
https://rmf.fm/about about 0 0.0× 0
https://rmf.fm/products product 0 0.0× 0
https://rmf.fm/features product 0 0.0× 0
https://rmf.fm/solutions product 0 0.0× 0
https://rmf.fm/docs docs 0 0.0× 0
https://rmf.fm/blog blog 0 0.0× 0
https://rmf.fm/demo conversion 0 0.0× 0
https://rmf.fm/get-started conversion 0 0.0× 0
https://rmf.fm/case-studies social-proof 0 0.0× 0
https://rmf.fm/integrations integrations 0 0.0× 0
https://rmf.fm/contact support 0 0.0× 0
https://rmf.fm/faq support 0 0.0× 0
https://rmf.fm/support support 0 0.0× 0
https://rmf.fm/trust trust 0 0.0× 0
https://rmf.fm/careers careers 0 0.0× 0
Showing 20 of 22 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/support/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/trust/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/help/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/demo/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/guides/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/privacy/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/terms/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/blog/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/contact/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/rmf.fm

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to rmf.fm. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
rmf.fm (this site) 44 65 Custom / Proprietary 5.1× 0
hunter32.ru 54 71 Custom / Proprietary 5.2× 0 Compare →
promet-split.hr 54 69 Custom / Proprietary 7.1× 0 Compare →
laist.com 54 58 Custom / Proprietary 4.5× 1 Compare →
worldfishingnetwork.com 54 68 Custom / Proprietary 2.6× 0 Compare →
futanarireview.com 54 69 Custom / Proprietary 7.7× 0 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite rmf.fm when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to rmf.fm. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Rmf",
  "url": "https://rmf.fm",
  "logo": "https://rmf.fm/assets/images/favicon/apple-icon-57x57.png?3",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Rmf",
  "url": "https://rmf.fm",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://rmf.fm/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Rmf?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Rmf does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Rmf work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Rmf."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for rmf.fm:

Current Score
65
Projected Score
81
Improvement
+16 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →