rss.app 68 C
🛡️ SEO 75 🤖 GEO 65 ⚡ Perf 52 🏗️ Arch 83

rss.app — Global SEODiff Score 68/100

rss.app
📊

rss.app shows strong AI visibility with an ACRI of 82/100, outperforming 96% of indexed domains. In the infrastructure sector, rss.app outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Content is delivered server-side, meaning bots and AI agents can parse the full page without executing JavaScript. Heavy markup overhead (30.3× bloat) forces AI systems to wade through excess code before finding useful information. The site includes 2 schema blocks, providing adequate structured data for basic entity recognition. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

68
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (52) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (30×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 3 snapshots
Mar 7 Mar 21
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than rss.app?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)75 × 0.25 = 18.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)65 × 0.40 = 26.0
⚡ Performance (20% weight)52 × 0.20 = 10.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)83 × 0.15 = 12.4
Weighted sum = 18.8 + 26.0 + 10.4 + 12.4
Global SEODiff Score = 68 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
39
Structure
avg 35
84
Schema
avg 9
70
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 3%
Rank #31645
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 4%
Score 82/100

rss.app has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why rss.app ranks here

Tech stackNext.js
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage2 blocks
Token bloat30.3×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

75/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

64 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

159 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 10
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://rss.app
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✅ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — RSS Feed Generator, Widgets & Bots: Web & Social feeds | RSS.app
  • ✓ og:description — RSS.app is the #1 RSS feed generator and app. Generate custom feeds from any website or social media. Create widgets or auto-post to Discord, Slack & Telegram.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

65/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
rss.app
57
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 39/100 — Low
Structured Elements 82 elements (82 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1827
Raw Density4.5%
💡Low structure score (39/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 82 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ✅ Present
Total Schema Blocks2 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

4/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
✅ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

61
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability61/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (65/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

3%
🗑️ 97%
Useful Content (11.1 KB)Bloat (324.8 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio30.3× — Bloated

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage51 / 51 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 335.8 KB, but only 11.1 KB is text. 3% useful / 97% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (30.3×) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 96.7% · SNR: 0.03 · Signal: 2833 / Noise: 83141 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of rss.app and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
The RSS.app API provides a RESTful web service for developers to programmatically interact with RSS feeds, enabling them to create, delete, retrieve, and manage feeds.
Target Audience
Developers, web developers, data analysts, content publishers, and anyone needing to integrate RSS feed data into their applications.
Pricing Model
API Key based - Pricing not explicitly stated, but requires an API key and likely has usage limits.
🔗 Integration Partners
GitHub
🏆 Competitive Moat
Comprehensive API documentation and a robust set of endpoints for managing RSS feeds, combined with a focus on developer experience.
📊 Content Depth
8/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
API Reference documentationExample code snippets
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of clear pricing information
• Reliance on API keys for authentication
• Potential for rate limiting and usage restrictions
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-01

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkNext.js
AI-Readiness Score70/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time626 ms
Raw HTML Size335.8 KB
Visible Text Size11.1 KB

Performance & Speed

52/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

626 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1619
DOM nodes
336 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → s-maxage=600, stale-while-revalidate=31535400
  • ✓ CDN cache status → DYNAMIC
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

83/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://rss.app/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

176
internal links
5
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 57/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for rss.app
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/rss.app" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=rss.app" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 96 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
57
Single-page score
+2
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
60
Avg across 96 pages · Range 0–72
Topical Cohesion
23%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
201575
Avg Bloat
38.3×
RAG Fractures [?]
89
⚠️
89 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 89 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://rss.app/docs/api/feeds/retrieve
RSS API - Retrieve Feed | RSS.app
pricing 72 11.3× 6331 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://rss.app/docs/api/errors
RSS API - Errors | RSS.app
pricing 72 11.3× 6330 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://rss.app/docs/api/feeds/list
RSS API - List All Feeds | RSS.app
pricing 72 11.3× 6332 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://rss.app/docs/api
RSS API - API Reference | RSS.app
pricing 72 11.3× 6331 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://rss.app/docs/api/pagination
RSS API - Pagination | RSS.app
pricing 72 11.3× 6330 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://rss.app/docs/api/feeds/update
RSS API - Update Feed | RSS.app
pricing 72 11.3× 6331 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://rss.app/docs/api/bundles/add-feed
RSS API - Add Feed To Bundle | RSS.app
pricing 72 11.3× 6333 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://rss.app/docs/api/feeds/delete
RSS API - Delete Feed | RSS.app
pricing 72 11.3× 6331 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://rss.app/docs/api/feeds
RSS API - Feeds | RSS.app
pricing 72 11.3× 6330 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://rss.app/docs/api/bundles/delete-feed
RSS API - Delete Feed from Bundle | RSS.app
pricing 72 11.3× 6333 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://rss.app/docs/api/authentication
RSS API - Authentication | RSS.app
pricing 72 11.3× 6330 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://rss.app/docs/api/bundles/update
RSS API - Update Bundle | RSS.app
pricing 72 11.3× 6331 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://rss.app/docs/api/feeds/create-by-url
RSS API - Create Feed by URL | RSS.app
pricing 72 11.3× 6333 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://rss.app/docs/api/webhooks
RSS API - Webhooks | RSS.app
pricing 72 11.3× 6330 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://rss.app/docs/api/bundles/delete
RSS API - Delete Bundle | RSS.app
pricing 72 11.3× 6331 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://rss.app/docs/api/feeds/create-by-keyword
RSS API - Create Feed by Keyword | RSS.app
pricing 72 11.3× 6333 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://rss.app/docs/api/feeds/settings-get
RSS API - Feed Settings | RSS.app
pricing 72 11.3× 6331 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://rss.app/docs/api/feeds/settings-update
RSS API - Update Feed Settings | RSS.app
pricing 72 11.3× 6332 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://rss.app/docs/api/bundles
RSS API - Bundles | RSS.app
pricing 72 11.3× 6330 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://rss.app/docs/api/bundles/create
RSS API - Create Bundle | RSS.app
pricing 72 11.3× 6331 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
Showing 20 of 96 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/blog/ 65 62 1% 35.9× Bot Blocked
/docs/ 23 69 0% 10.8× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 1 61 1% 95.5× Bot Blocked
/about/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/contact/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 26 0% 907.1× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/pricing/ 1 61 1% 95.5× Bot Blocked
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/rss.app

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to rss.app. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
rss.app (this site) 57 82 Next.js 30.3× 2
brownells.com 82 88 Next.js 3.2× 3 Compare →
voltas.com 82 88 Next.js 2.8× 1 Compare →
monsterscooterparts.com 82 94 Next.js 2.9× 3 Compare →
sehgalmotors.pk 82 87 Next.js 3.3× 5 Compare →
arekkusu-store.com 82 86 Next.js 3.4× 5 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite rss.app when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to rss.app. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 3% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Rss?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Rss does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Rss work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Rss."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for rss.app:

Current Score
82
Projected Score
90
Improvement
+8 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →