rtarabic.com 63 C
🛡️ SEO 37 🤖 GEO 81 ⚡ Perf 36 🏗️ Arch 97

rtarabic.com — Global SEODiff Score 63/100

rtarabic.com
📊

At 83/100, the ACRI for rtarabic.com indicates strong fundamentals in AI extractability, surpassing the majority of indexed sites. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. Token bloat registers at 5.5× — acceptable, but reducing inline scripts and redundant markup could yield measurable gains. Minimal structured data (1 block) limits the site's ability to communicate entity relationships to AI systems. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

63
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (36) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 4 snapshots
Mar 5 Mar 21
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
📉 Mar 21 ACRI -1 (72→71)
🔄 Mar 16 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than rtarabic.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)37 × 0.25 = 9.2
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)81 × 0.40 = 32.4
⚡ Performance (20% weight)36 × 0.20 = 7.2
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)97 × 0.15 = 14.5
Weighted sum = 9.2 + 32.4 + 7.2 + 14.5
Global SEODiff Score = 63 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
85
Structure
avg 35
42
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 25%
Rank #254377
-22 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 3%
Score 83/100

rtarabic.com ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 25%) than in AI search (Top 3%). This is the 'Visibility Gap' pattern — implementing the recommendations above can help close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why rtarabic.com ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
Industry
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat5.5×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

37/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

9 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

221 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 22
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✗ Canonical tag present
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ar
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — RT Arabic
  • ✗ og:description
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

81/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 85/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 1440 elements (1440 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words6587
Raw Density21.9%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

1/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

79
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability79/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (70/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

18%
🗑️ 82%
Useful Content (309.4 KB)Bloat (1400.5 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio5.5× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context84% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage191 / 228 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 81.9% · SNR: 0.22 · Signal: 79195 / Noise: 358522 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of rtarabic.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
The website provides news coverage from RT Arabic, focusing on geopolitical events and international relations, including coverage of Russia, Ukraine, Iran, and the Middle East.
Target Audience
International news consumers, particularly those interested in Russian and Middle Eastern perspectives on global events.
Pricing Model
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
🏆 Competitive Moat
Broad international news coverage with a specific focus on Russian and Middle Eastern viewpoints.
📊 Content Depth
3/10
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Limited SEO data available for analysis.
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-12

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Servernginx
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time939 ms
Raw HTML Size1709.8 KB
Visible Text Size309.4 KB

Performance & Speed

36/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

939 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

9383
DOM nodes
1710 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → no-cache,no-store,max-age=0
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

97/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://arabic.rt.com/rss/sitemap/
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

1835
internal links
49
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ar
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 71/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for rtarabic.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/rtarabic.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=rtarabic.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
71
Single-page score
-66
Severe hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
6
Avg across 10 pages · Range 0–57
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 71, but internal pages average only 6 — a -66-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Total Words
429
Avg Bloat
4.0×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://rtarabic.com/features
التقارير المصورة - RT Arabic
product 57 40.0× 429
https://rtarabic.com/pricing pricing 0 0.0× 0
https://rtarabic.com/about about 0 0.0× 0
https://rtarabic.com/products product 0 0.0× 0
https://rtarabic.com/blog blog 0 0.0× 0
https://rtarabic.com/docs docs 0 0.0× 0
https://rtarabic.com/case-studies social-proof 0 0.0× 0
https://rtarabic.com/faq support 0 0.0× 0
https://rtarabic.com/integrations integrations 0 0.0× 0
https://rtarabic.com/contact support 0 0.0× 0
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/contact/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/about/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/features/ 1 57 0% 40.0× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/blog/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
lessons.rt.com ×1
t.me ×1
award.rt.com ×1
arabic.rt.com ×1
arbooks.rt.com ×1
liveinternet.ru ×1
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/rtarabic.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to rtarabic.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
rtarabic.com (this site) 71 83 Custom / Proprietary 5.5× 1
pacificpeche.com 81 86 Custom / Proprietary 3.8× 2 Compare →
spur.hpplus.jp 81 87 Custom / Proprietary 5.7× 3 Compare →
stamp-marche.com 81 86 Custom / Proprietary 2.1× 2 Compare →
pekar-konditer.com.ua 81 84 Custom / Proprietary 1.8× 2 Compare →
talis.bg 81 85 Custom / Proprietary 3.1× 3 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite rtarabic.com when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to rtarabic.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Rtarabic",
  "url": "https://rtarabic.com",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://rtarabic.com/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Rtarabic?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Rtarabic does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Rtarabic work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Rtarabic."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for rtarabic.com:

Current Score
83
Projected Score
93
Improvement
+10 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →