salford.ac.uk 70 B
🛡️ SEO 46 🤖 GEO 82 ⚡ Perf 65 🏗️ Arch 83

salford.ac.uk — Global SEODiff Score 70/100

salford.ac.uk
📊

salford.ac.uk achieves a 75/100 on the AI-Crawler Reality Index, reflecting above-average readiness for AI-driven discovery. Compared to other education sites (avg score: 57), salford.ac.uk performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. With a 3.7× bloat ratio, the page delivers its content without excessive boilerplate, giving AI systems a clean extraction path. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

70
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (46) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Fix title tag length → +3 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 6 snapshots
Feb 23 Mar 21
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than salford.ac.uk?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)46 × 0.25 = 11.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)82 × 0.40 = 32.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)65 × 0.20 = 13.0
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)83 × 0.15 = 12.4
Weighted sum = 11.5 + 32.8 + 13.0 + 12.4
Global SEODiff Score = 70 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
66
Structure
avg 35
2
Schema
avg 9
70
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 4%
Rank #37043
+16 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 19%
Score 75/100

salford.ac.uk punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why salford.ac.uk ranks here

Tech stackNext.js
Industryeducation
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat3.7×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

46/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

72 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

148 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 6
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.salford.ac.uk/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Homepage | University of Salford
  • ✗ og:description
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

82/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the education sector, melbourneschool.com (ACRI: 86) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
salford.ac.uk
62
Your ACRI Score
86
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. melbourneschool.com has schema coverage of 4 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 66/100 — Good
Structured Elements 94 elements (94 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words728
Raw Density12.9%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

65
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability65/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

27%
🗑️ 73%
Useful Content (25.5 KB)Bloat (69.0 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio3.7× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage21 / 21 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

32 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 73.0% · SNR: 0.37 · Signal: 6533 / Noise: 17668 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of salford.ac.uk and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
This program trains PhD students in prosthetics and orthotics, fostering innovation and addressing global healthcare needs through industry collaboration and real-world experience.
Target Audience
PhD students, researchers, healthcare professionals, industry partners, and third-sector agencies involved in prosthetics and orthotics.
Pricing Model
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
🏆 Competitive Moat
Collaboration with leading universities and industry partners to drive innovation and real-world impact.
📊 Content Depth
5/10
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of access to prosthetic and orthotic services for many users
• High rates of amputation and disability requiring specialized devices
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-02

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkNext.js
AI-Readiness Score70/100
Server
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time682 ms
Raw HTML Size94.5 KB
Visible Text Size25.5 KB

Performance & Speed

65/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

682 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

836
DOM nodes
94 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → max-age=16588800, public
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

83/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.salford.ac.uk/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

89
internal links
12
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 62/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for salford.ac.uk
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/salford.ac.uk" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=salford.ac.uk" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 90 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
62
Single-page score
-8
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
55
Avg across 90 pages · Range 0–90
Topical Cohesion
7%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
41750
Avg Bloat
48.3×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.salford.ac.uk/skills/support/university-words-phrases-and-terms
University words, phrases and terms | University of Salford
pricing 90 4.3× 5743 💰 Pricing
https://www.salford.ac.uk/careers/support/workshops
Workshops | University of Salford
pricing 85 7.6× 2664 💰 Pricing
https://www.salford.ac.uk/apprenticeships/case-studies/agata-otto-beng-hons-civil-engineering
Agata Otto - BEng (Hons) Civil Engineering | University of Salford
social-proof 75 18.4× 638
https://www.salford.ac.uk/apprenticeships/case-studies/megan-mulheir-bsc-hons-professional-policing-practice
Megan Mulheir - BSc (Hons) Professional Policing Practice | University of Salford
pricing 75 14.1× 864 💰 Pricing
https://www.salford.ac.uk/postgraduate-research/case-studies
Case studies | University of Salford
social-proof 75 11.6× 1161
https://www.salford.ac.uk/doctoral-school/case-studies/ivy-okereke-health-and-society
Ivy Okereke (Health and Society) | University of Salford
social-proof 75 14.0× 860
https://www.salford.ac.uk/careers/support/online-learning
Online learning | University of Salford
pricing 75 13.4× 1435 💰 Pricing
https://www.salford.ac.uk/skills/support/workshops
Workshops | University of Salford
pricing 75 17.2× 781 💰 Pricing
https://www.salford.ac.uk/careers/support/support-for-international-students
Support for international students | University of Salford
pricing 75 17.2× 1021 💰 Pricing
https://www.salford.ac.uk/careers/support/our-offer-to-you/employers
Employers | University of Salford
pricing 75 17.4× 1000 💰 Pricing
https://www.salford.ac.uk/library/support/support-for-academic-staff
Support for academic staff | University of Salford
pricing 75 17.2× 1026 💰 Pricing
https://www.salford.ac.uk/library/support/accessibility-in-the-library
Accessibility in the Library | University of Salford
pricing 75 10.9× 1776 💰 Pricing
https://www.salford.ac.uk/centre-for-doctoral-training-in-prosthetics-and-orthotics/about
About | University of Salford
about 70 24.2× 519
https://www.salford.ac.uk/doctoral-school/case-studies/matthew-wassall-health-and-society
Matthew Wassall (Health and Society) | University of Salford
pricing 70 20.8× 559 💰 Pricing
https://www.salford.ac.uk/careers/support/our-offer-to-you/graduates-and-alumni
Graduates and alumni | University of Salford
pricing 70 23.3× 734 💰 Pricing
https://www.salford.ac.uk/careers/support/book-an-appointment
Book an appointment | University of Salford
pricing 70 23.4× 705 💰 Pricing
https://www.salford.ac.uk/skills/support/reassessment
Reassessment | University of Salford
pricing 70 22.6× 794 💰 Pricing
https://salford.ac.uk/contact
Contact us | University of Salford
support 67 29.6× 1134
https://www.salford.ac.uk/skills/support/study-guides
Study guides | University of Salford
support 67 31.4× 514
https://www.salford.ac.uk/careers/support/our-offer-to-you/current-students
Current students | University of Salford
pricing 67 30.5× 548 💰 Pricing
Showing 20 of 90 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/case-studies/ 30 56 0% 41.0× High JS Bloat
/careers/ 18 62 0% 56.9× High JS Bloat
/library/ 11 57 0% 71.7× High JS Bloat
/skills/ 10 60 0% 77.5× High JS Bloat
/doctoral-school/ 7 59 0% 40.9× High JS Bloat
/apprenticeships/ 2 75 0% 16.3× High JS Bloat
/centre-for-doctoral-training-in-prosthetics-and-orthotics/ 1 70 0% 24.2× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/blog/ 1 47 0% 106.5× High JS Bloat
/school-health-society/ 1 57 0% 44.6× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/postgraduate-research/ 1 75 0% 11.6× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 90 pages
testlivesalfordac.sharepoint.com ×83
fromsalford.com ×83
linkedin.com ×82
qaa.ac.uk ×82
instagram.com ×82
tiktok.com ×82
youtube.com ×82
x.com ×82
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/salford.ac.uk

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar education Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to salford.ac.uk. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
salford.ac.uk (this site) 62 75 Next.js 3.7× 1
nashvillerotary.org 80 84 WordPress 3.0× 1 Compare →
house.hackers.com 80 80 Custom / Proprietary 1.7× 1 Compare →
police.hackers.com 81 86 Custom / Proprietary 1.7× 1 Compare →
epolice.hackers.com 81 86 Custom / Proprietary 1.7× 1 Compare →
teacher.hackers.com 81 86 Custom / Proprietary 1.6× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite salford.ac.uk when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to salford.ac.uk. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Ac",
  "url": "https://salford.ac.uk",
  "logo": "https://salford.ac.uk/themes/custom/uos/favicon.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Ac",
  "url": "https://salford.ac.uk",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://salford.ac.uk/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Ac?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Ac does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Ac work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Ac."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for salford.ac.uk:

Current Score
75
Projected Score
88
Improvement
+13 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →