schaatsen.nl 63 C
🛡️ SEO 38 🤖 GEO 72 ⚡ Perf 62 🏗️ Arch 81

schaatsen.nl — Global SEODiff Score 63/100

schaatsen.nl
📊

With a solid 67/100 ACRI, schaatsen.nl is well-positioned for AI search — better than 59% of sites in the Radar. In the saas sector, schaatsen.nl outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The low ghost ratio (5%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. A tight 4.8× token bloat ratio reflects disciplined markup: minimal noise between the crawler and the content it needs. Zero schema blocks puts this site at a disadvantage in knowledge graph and AI-answer pipelines that rely on explicit structured data. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

63
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (38) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add Organization + WebSite JSON-LD → +5–8 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 19, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 7 snapshots
Feb 23 Mar 19
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 19 Content change detected
📈 Mar 14 ACRI +1 (41→42)
Does your site score higher than schaatsen.nl?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)38 × 0.25 = 9.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)72 × 0.40 = 28.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)62 × 0.20 = 12.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)81 × 0.15 = 12.2
Weighted sum = 9.5 + 28.8 + 12.4 + 12.2
Global SEODiff Score = 63 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
25
Structure
avg 35
0
Schema
avg 9
70
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 9%
Rank #87373
+33 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 41%
Score 67/100

schaatsen.nl punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why schaatsen.nl ranks here

Tech stackNext.js
Industrysaas
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat4.8×

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

38/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

74 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

241 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 5
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.schaatsen.nl/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → nl
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Schaatsen.nl alles voor jouw als schaatsfan!
  • ✓ og:description — Alles over schaatsen en inlineskaten begint op Schaatsen.nl. Speciaal voor fans van het: Langebaanschaatsen, Shorttrack, Marathonschaatsen, Kunstschaatsen, Inlineskaten en schaatsen op natuurijs. Uitslagen, Programma's, Tickets, Evenementen.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

72/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the saas sector, smahospital.jp (ACRI: 84) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
schaatsen.nl
42
Your ACRI Score
84
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. smahospital.jp has schema coverage of 1 blocks and uses Next.js. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 25/100 — Low
Structured Elements 11 elements (11 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words568
Raw Density1.9%
💡Low structure score (25/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 11 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

52
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability52/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

20%
🗑️ 80%
Useful Content (15.5 KB)Bloat (58.3 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio4.8× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context87% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage20 / 23 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

5 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 79.0% · SNR: 0.27 · Signal: 3971 / Noise: 14924 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of schaatsen.nl and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
This website is a fan site for Dutch speed skating, providing news, calendars, results, standings, and ticket information for events and competitions.
Target Audience
Speed skating fans, particularly those interested in Dutch speed skating and the Olympic Games.
Pricing Model
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
🏆 Competitive Moat
Comprehensive coverage of Dutch speed skating events and athlete data, combined with a strong community focus.
📊 Content Depth
6/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Ticket pagesNews pagesCalendar pagesUitslagen (Results) pages
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of structured FAQ schema
• Limited SEO depth for individual athlete profiles
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-04

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkNext.js
AI-Readiness Score70/100
Servernginx
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1064 ms
Raw HTML Size73.8 KB
Visible Text Size15.5 KB

Performance & Speed

62/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1064 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

556
DOM nodes
74 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

81/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.schaatsen.nl/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

84
internal links
6
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → nl
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 42/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for schaatsen.nl
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/schaatsen.nl" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=schaatsen.nl" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 52 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
42
Single-page score
+3
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
46
Avg across 52 pages · Range 0–77
Topical Cohesion
4%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
20831
Avg Bloat
18.5×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.schaatsen.nl/nieuws/gerritsen-timmer-en-boer-weg-bij/
Gerritsen, Timmer en Boer weg bij... - Schaatsen.nl
other 77 9.7× 1048
https://www.schaatsen.nl/nieuws/bart-swings-wint-veldrit-in-staphorst/
Bart Swings wint 'veldrit' in Staphorst - Schaatsen.nl
other 67 11.5× 871
https://www.schaatsen.nl/nieuws/de-vries-vreest-baantitels-niet-te/
De Vries vreest baantitels niet te... - Schaatsen.nl
other 67 10.5× 948
https://www.schaatsen.nl/nieuws/rutger-ter-laak-wil-terugkomen/
Rutger ter Laak wil terugkomen - Schaatsen.nl
other 67 10.5× 942
https://www.schaatsen.nl/nieuws/historisch-goud-smaakt-naar-meer/
Historisch goud smaakt naar meer - Schaatsen.nl
other 67 12.3× 794
https://www.schaatsen.nl/nieuws/ferre-spruyt-wint-snelle-race-in-otterlo/
Ferre Spruyt wint snelle race in Otterlo - Schaatsen.nl
other 67 10.0× 1009
https://schaatsen.nl/contact
Contact met schaatsen.nl - Schaatsen.nl
support 64 16.9× 548
https://www.schaatsen.nl/contact/
Contact met schaatsen.nl - Schaatsen.nl
support 64 16.9× 548
https://www.schaatsen.nl/nieuws/mooi-veld-in-de-topdivisie/
Mooi veld in de Topdivisie - Schaatsen.nl
other 64 17.1× 549
https://www.schaatsen.nl/nieuws/van-haaster-completeert-team-bekkering/
Van Haaster completeert team Bekkering - Schaatsen.nl
about 64 18.1× 504
https://www.schaatsen.nl/nieuws/tuitert-verrast-op-asfalt/
Tuitert verrast op asfalt - Schaatsen.nl
other 64 16.9× 557
https://www.schaatsen.nl/nieuws/verweij-cup-kroon-op-constant-seizoen/
Verweij: 'Cup kroon op constant seizoen' - Schaatsen.nl
other 64 16.6× 571
https://www.schaatsen.nl/nieuws/ronald-mulder-op-mijn-hoede-morgen/
Ronald Mulder: 'Op mijn hoede morgen' - Schaatsen.nl
other 64 16.8× 566
https://www.schaatsen.nl/nieuws/van-der-weijden-hoopt-na-zege-op-sponsor/
Van der Weijden hoopt na zege op sponsor - Schaatsen.nl
other 64 18.2× 516
https://www.schaatsen.nl/nieuws/ter-mors-grijpt-naast-eremetaal/
Ter Mors grijpt naast eremetaal - Schaatsen.nl
other 64 14.3× 677
https://www.schaatsen.nl/nieuws/ter-mors-maximale-eruit-gehaald/
Ter Mors: 'Maximale eruit gehaald' - Schaatsen.nl
other 64 18.1× 517
https://www.schaatsen.nl/nieuws/de-eerste-slag-is-voor-crispijn-ariens/
De eerste slag is voor Crispijn Ariëns - Schaatsen.nl
other 54 18.6× 494
https://www.schaatsen.nl/nieuws/friesinger-stopt-met-schaatsen/
Friesinger stopt met schaatsen - Schaatsen.nl
other 54 19.8× 459
https://www.schaatsen.nl/nieuws/kunstrijders-sluiten-seizoen-af-met/
Kunstrijders sluiten seizoen af met... - Schaatsen.nl
other 54 18.5× 497
https://www.schaatsen.nl/nieuws/blokhuijsen-ander-team-wel-schakelen/
Blokhuijsen: 'Ander team wel schakelen' - Schaatsen.nl
about 54 18.7× 495
Showing 20 of 52 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/nieuws/ 41 55 0% 22.6× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 2 64 0% 16.9× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/about/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 52 pages
tiktok.com ×43
facebook.com ×43
instagram.com ×43
youtube.com ×43
knsb.nl ×43
inschrijven.schaatsen.nl ×43
staatsloterij.nederlandseloterij.nl ×43
langebaantijden.schaatsen.nl ×43
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/schaatsen.nl

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar saas Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to schaatsen.nl. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
schaatsen.nl (this site) 42 67 Next.js 4.8× 0
hcsochi.ru 67 78 Next.js 3.0× 0 Compare →
pulskardioloskicentar.rs 67 84 Next.js 26.3× 1 Compare →
maybic.com 67 79 Cloudflare Pages 4.4× 0 Compare →
gutschein.ace.de 67 76 Adobe Experience Manager 3.1× 0 Compare →
yq4.net 67 82 Cloudflare Pages 3.1× 0 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite schaatsen.nl when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to schaatsen.nl. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Schaatsen",
  "url": "https://schaatsen.nl",
  "logo": "https://schaatsen.nl/static/images/favicons/favicon-64x64.png",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Schaatsen",
  "url": "https://schaatsen.nl",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://schaatsen.nl/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Schaatsen?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Schaatsen does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Schaatsen work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Schaatsen."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for schaatsen.nl:

Current Score
67
Projected Score
83
Improvement
+16 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →