sciencebasedmedicine.org 72 B
🛡️ SEO 65 🤖 GEO 76 ⚡ Perf 65 🏗️ Arch 79

sciencebasedmedicine.org — Global SEODiff Score 72/100

sciencebasedmedicine.org
📊

With a solid 81/100 ACRI, sciencebasedmedicine.org is well-positioned for AI search — better than 95% of sites in the Radar. In the healthcare sector, sciencebasedmedicine.org outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The low ghost ratio (0%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. A 10.4× bloat ratio is typical for sites in this tech tier — not wasteful, but streamlining could further boost extractability. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

72
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (65) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add HSTS header → +2 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 20, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 2 snapshots
Mar 8 Mar 15
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 20 Content change detected
📈 Mar 15 ACRI +1 (65→66)
Does your site score higher than sciencebasedmedicine.org?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)65 × 0.25 = 16.2
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)76 × 0.40 = 30.4
⚡ Performance (20% weight)65 × 0.20 = 13.0
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)79 × 0.15 = 11.8
Weighted sum = 16.2 + 30.4 + 13.0 + 11.8
Global SEODiff Score = 72 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
58
Structure
avg 35
42
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 5%
Rank #45583
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 5%
Score 81/100

sciencebasedmedicine.org has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why sciencebasedmedicine.org ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
Industryhealthcare
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat10.4×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

65/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

22 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

83 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 2
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 11
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Science-Based Medicine
  • ✓ og:description — Welcome to Science-Based Medicine - Exploring issues and controversies in the relationship between science and medicine
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

76/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the healthcare sector, hairdresserfind.com.au (ACRI: 86) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
sciencebasedmedicine.org
66
Your ACRI Score
86
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. hairdresserfind.com.au has schema coverage of 4 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 58/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 134 elements (134 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1349
Raw Density9.9%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

3/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

63
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability63/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

9%
🗑️ 91%
Useful Content (13.1 KB)Bloat (123.1 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio10.4× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context75% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage15 / 20 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 90.4% · SNR: 0.11 · Signal: 3355 / Noise: 31506 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of sciencebasedmedicine.org and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
An iPad/iPhone guide providing information on botanicals, supplements, and complementary therapies, offering a broad overview of various health-related topics.
Target Audience
Healthcare professionals (doctors, nurses), patients seeking alternative therapies, and individuals interested in complementary medicine.
Pricing Model
Subscription-based (likely monthly or annual), details not explicitly stated.
🏆 Competitive Moat
Aggregated, uncritical presentation of information on complementary therapies, lacking critical analysis and recommendations.
📊 Content Depth
4/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Template comparison pages
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lacks critical analysis and recommendations
• Cherry-picks data and omits contradictory evidence
• Presents information in a disorganized and unhelpful manner
• Does not distinguish between reliable and unreliable sources
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-02

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time675 ms
Raw HTML Size136.2 KB
Visible Text Size13.1 KB

Performance & Speed

65/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

675 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

875
DOM nodes
136 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → max-age=600, must-revalidate
  • ✓ CDN cache status → DYNAMIC
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

79/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → http://sciencebasedmedicine.org/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

249
internal links
8
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 66/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for sciencebasedmedicine.org
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/sciencebasedmedicine.org" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=sciencebasedmedicine.org" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 79 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
66
Single-page score
-2
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
64
Avg across 79 pages · Range 0–90
Topical Cohesion
11%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
142554
Avg Bloat
30.1×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/reference/vaccines-and-autism/
Vaccines & Autism | Science-Based Medicine
pricing 90 4.6× 10180 💰 Pricing
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/reference/homeopathy/
Homeopathy | Science-Based Medicine
pricing 85 8.5× 4037 💰 Pricing
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/reference/chiropractic/
Chiropractic | Science-Based Medicine
docs 85 9.1× 3817
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/blog
Blog Discussion with an SBM Critic | Science-Based Medicine
blog 85 7.0× 4926
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/the-national-center-for-complementary-and-alternative-medicine-nccam-your-tax-dollars-hard-at-work/
The National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM): Your tax dollars hard at work | Science-Based Medicine
pricing 85 9.4× 3951 💰 Pricing
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/on-the-nature-of-alternative-medicine-cancer-cure-testimonials/
On the nature of “alternative” medicine cancer cure testimonials | Science-Based Medicine
pricing 85 8.1× 4433 💰 Pricing
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/when-the-widespread-adoption-of-surgical-procedures-outruns-science/
When the popularity of new surgical procedures outpaces science | Science-Based Medicine
pricing 85 7.8× 4501 💰 Pricing
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/mercury-in-vaccines-and-autism-a-failed-hypothesis/
Mercury in vaccines as a cause of autism and autism spectrum disorders (ASDs): A failed hypothesis | Science-Based Medicine
pricing 85 9.2× 3869 💰 Pricing
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/the-infiltration-of-cam-and-integrative-medicine-into-academia/
The infiltration of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and “integrative medicine” into academia | Science-Based Medicine
pricing 85 7.1× 5529 💰 Pricing
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/toxic-myths-about-vaccines/
Toxic myths about vaccines | Science-Based Medicine
pricing 85 7.8× 4519 💰 Pricing
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/reference/acupuncture/
Acupuncture | Science-Based Medicine
pricing 75 11.6× 2822 💰 Pricing
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/about
About Herbs: an app to avoid | Science-Based Medicine
pricing 75 15.6× 2014 💰 Pricing
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/docs
Docs v. Glocks: government regulation of physician speech | Science-Based Medicine
docs 75 10.7× 3086
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/alternative-flight/
Alternative Flight | Science-Based Medicine
pricing 75 13.9× 2228 💰 Pricing
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/homeopathy-and-evidence-based-medicine-back-to-the-future-part-v/
Homeopathy and Evidence-Based Medicine: Back to the Future Part V | Science-Based Medicine
pricing 75 11.5× 3097 💰 Pricing
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/can-magnets-heal/
Can Magnets Heal? | Science-Based Medicine
other 75 15.0× 2055
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/homeopathy-and-evidence-based-medicine-back-to-the-future-part-ii/
Homeopathy and Evidence-Based Medicine: Back to the Future – Part II | Science-Based Medicine
pricing 75 15.2× 2156 💰 Pricing
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/the-iraqi-civilian-war-dead-scandal/
The Iraqi Civilian War Dead Scandal | Science-Based Medicine
pricing 75 12.8× 2438 💰 Pricing
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/homeopathy-and-evidence-based-medicine-back-to-the-future-part-iii/
Homeopathy and Evidence-Based Medicine: Back to the Future–Part III | Science-Based Medicine
other 75 16.4× 1958
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/the-international-network-of-cholesterol-skeptics/
The International Network of Cholesterol Skeptics | Science-Based Medicine
other 75 16.4× 1948
Showing 20 of 79 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/reference/ 20 61 0% 72.5× High JS Bloat
/homeopathy-and-evidence-based-medicine-back-to-the-future-part-v/ 1 75 0% 11.5× High JS Bloat
/the-plant-vs-pharmaceutical-false-dichotomy/ 1 72 0% 19.7× High JS Bloat
/antibiotics-for-sinusitis/ 1 67 0% 21.9× High JS Bloat
/homeopathy-and-evidence-based-medicine-back-to-the-future-part-iii/ 1 75 0% 16.4× High JS Bloat
/hype-over-science-does-acupuncture-really-improve-the-chances-of-success-for-in-vitro-fertilization/ 1 75 0% 11.7× High JS Bloat
/annals-of-questionable-evidence-a-new-study-reveals-substantial-publication-bias-in-trials-of-anti-depressants/ 1 67 0% 22.8× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 75 0% 10.7× High JS Bloat
/can-magnets-heal/ 1 75 0% 15.0× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 85 0% 7.0× High JS Bloat
/toxic-myths-about-vaccines/ 1 85 0% 7.8× High JS Bloat
/the-infiltration-of-cam-and-integrative-medicine-into-academia/ 1 85 0% 7.1× High JS Bloat
/homeocracy/ 1 75 0% 15.7× High JS Bloat
/4/ 1 75 0% 13.0× High JS Bloat
/the-placebo-effect/ 1 72 0% 17.1× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 79 pages
pinterest.com ×72
reddit.com ×72
vk.com ×72
mix.com ×72
linkedin.com ×72
bufferapp.com ×72
twitter.com ×72
patreon.com ×72
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/sciencebasedmedicine.org

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar healthcare Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to sciencebasedmedicine.org. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
sciencebasedmedicine.org (this site) 66 81 WordPress 10.4× 1
volunteerforever.com 80 88 WordPress 4.8× 1 Compare →
trinityhealth.org 82 90 WordPress 6.0× 2 Compare →
blogs.juniper.net 82 88 WordPress 3.3× 1 Compare →
reliantmedicalgroup.org 82 88 WordPress 2.5× 1 Compare →
newly-registered-domains.whoisxmlapi.com 81 84 WordPress 1.9× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite sciencebasedmedicine.org when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to sciencebasedmedicine.org. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 9% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Sciencebasedmedicine?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Sciencebasedmedicine does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Sciencebasedmedicine work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Sciencebasedmedicine."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for sciencebasedmedicine.org:

Current Score
81
Projected Score
89
Improvement
+8 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →