sharesmagazine.co.uk 67 C
🛡️ SEO 55 🤖 GEO 77 ⚡ Perf 52 🏗️ Arch 80

sharesmagazine.co.uk — Global SEODiff Score 67/100

sharesmagazine.co.uk
📊

The AI-Readiness profile for sharesmagazine.co.uk is strong: an ACRI of 69/100 places it ahead of 64% of domains in the index. In the finance sector, sharesmagazine.co.uk outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The low ghost ratio (5%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. The token bloat ratio sits at a lean 3.4×, meaning the ratio of code to visible content is efficient — crawlers spend their token budget on actual information. Minimal structured data (1 block) limits the site's ability to communicate entity relationships to AI systems. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

67
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (52) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 7 snapshots
Feb 23 Mar 21
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
📈 Mar 21 ACRI +38 (23→61)
📉 Mar 16 ACRI -38 (61→23)
Does your site score higher than sharesmagazine.co.uk?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)55 × 0.25 = 13.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)77 × 0.40 = 30.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)52 × 0.20 = 10.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)80 × 0.15 = 12.0
Weighted sum = 13.8 + 30.8 + 10.4 + 12.0
Global SEODiff Score = 67 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
47
Structure
avg 35
2
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 38%
Rank #378985
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 36%
Score 69/100

sharesmagazine.co.uk has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why sharesmagazine.co.uk ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
Industryfinance
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat3.4×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

55/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

25 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

78 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 2
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.ajbell.co.uk/news/shares-magazine
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✗ og:title
  • ✗ og:description
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

77/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the finance sector, cardpay.com (ACRI: 82) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
sharesmagazine.co.uk
61
Your ACRI Score
82
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. cardpay.com has schema coverage of 1 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 47/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 284 elements (284 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words4337
Raw Density6.6%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

1/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

59
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability59/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (50/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

29%
🗑️ 71%
Useful Content (114.3 KB)Bloat (272.2 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio3.4× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage54 / 54 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

40 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 70.4% · SNR: 0.42 · Signal: 29252 / Noise: 69671 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of sharesmagazine.co.uk and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Shares magazine provides in-depth financial analysis and investment advice to individual investors, focusing on UK equities and global markets.
Target Audience
Individual investors, particularly those interested in UK equities, retirement planning, and personal finance.
Pricing Model
Subscription-based magazine with various tiers (likely print and digital), details not explicitly stated.
🏆 Competitive Moat
Expert analysis and advice from financial professionals (Russ Mould, Laura Suter, Paul Angell, Rachel Vahey) providing a competitive advantage through trusted insights.
📊 Content Depth
8/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Template comparison pages (e.g., ‘How REITs let you use the stock market to get property income’)Integration directory pages (e.g., ‘Ask the experts’ – referencing specific financial advisors)
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of structured FAQ schema
• Thin landing pages for features (implied by the reliance on longer articles)
• Potential for investor confusion due to market volatility and complex investment strategies
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-21

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Serverenvoy
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time680 ms
Raw HTML Size386.4 KB
Visible Text Size114.3 KB

Performance & Speed

52/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

680 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

2467
DOM nodes
386 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → max-age=900, public
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

80/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

280
internal links
12
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 61/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for sharesmagazine.co.uk
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/sharesmagazine.co.uk" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=sharesmagazine.co.uk" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
61
Single-page score
+6
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
67
Avg across 10 pages · Range 67–67
Total Words
20310
Avg Bloat
39.0×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://sharesmagazine.co.uk/pricing
Shares magazine | AJ Bell
pricing 67 39.0× 2031 💰 Pricing
https://sharesmagazine.co.uk/about
Shares magazine | AJ Bell
pricing 67 39.0× 2031 💰 Pricing
https://sharesmagazine.co.uk/products
Shares magazine | AJ Bell
pricing 67 39.0× 2031 💰 Pricing
https://sharesmagazine.co.uk/features
Shares magazine | AJ Bell
pricing 67 39.0× 2031 💰 Pricing
https://sharesmagazine.co.uk/blog
Shares magazine | AJ Bell
pricing 67 39.0× 2031 💰 Pricing
https://sharesmagazine.co.uk/docs
Shares magazine | AJ Bell
pricing 67 39.0× 2031 💰 Pricing
https://sharesmagazine.co.uk/case-studies
Shares magazine | AJ Bell
pricing 67 39.0× 2031 💰 Pricing
https://sharesmagazine.co.uk/contact
Shares magazine | AJ Bell
pricing 67 39.0× 2031 💰 Pricing
https://sharesmagazine.co.uk/faq
Shares magazine | AJ Bell
pricing 67 39.0× 2031 💰 Pricing
https://sharesmagazine.co.uk/integrations
Shares magazine | AJ Bell
pricing 67 39.0× 2031 💰 Pricing
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/about/ 1 67 0% 39.0× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 67 0% 39.0× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 67 0% 39.0× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 67 0% 39.0× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 67 0% 39.0× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 67 0% 39.0× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 67 0% 39.0× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 1 67 0% 39.0× High JS Bloat
/integrations/ 1 67 0% 39.0× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 67 0% 39.0× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
instagram.com ×10
play.google.com ×10
youtube.com ×10
ajbell.co.uk ×10
issuu.com ×10
twitter.com ×10
dodl.co.uk ×10
apps.apple.com ×10
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/sharesmagazine.co.uk

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar finance Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to sharesmagazine.co.uk. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
sharesmagazine.co.uk (this site) 61 69 Custom / Proprietary 3.4× 1
itiviti.com 78 85 Custom / Proprietary 2.6× 1 Compare →
stearnsbank.net 78 85 Custom / Proprietary 3.0× 2 Compare →
life.oricon.co.jp 78 84 Custom / Proprietary 4.4× 2 Compare →
hoiku.jinzaibank.com 79 86 Custom / Proprietary 2.3× 2 Compare →
romb.co.uk 82 86 Custom / Proprietary 3.2× 2 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite sharesmagazine.co.uk when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to sharesmagazine.co.uk. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Co",
  "url": "https://sharesmagazine.co.uk",
  "logo": "https://sharesmagazine.co.uk/sites/ajbell/files/favicon.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Co",
  "url": "https://sharesmagazine.co.uk",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://sharesmagazine.co.uk/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Co?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Co does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Co work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Co."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for sharesmagazine.co.uk:

Current Score
69
Projected Score
82
Improvement
+13 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →