silk.ge 70 B
🛡️ SEO 60 🤖 GEO 71 ⚡ Perf 80 🏗️ Arch 68

silk.ge — Global SEODiff Score 70/100

silk.ge
📊

With a solid 72/100 ACRI, silk.ge is well-positioned for AI search — better than 73% of sites in the Radar. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. A tight 3.0× token bloat ratio reflects disciplined markup: minimal noise between the crawler and the content it needs. Minimal structured data (1 block) limits the site's ability to communicate entity relationships to AI systems. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

70
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (60) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add HSTS header → +2 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 13, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 3 snapshots
Mar 3 Mar 13
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than silk.ge?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)60 × 0.25 = 15.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)71 × 0.40 = 28.4
⚡ Performance (20% weight)80 × 0.20 = 16.0
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)68 × 0.15 = 10.2
Weighted sum = 15.0 + 28.4 + 16.0 + 10.2
Global SEODiff Score = 70 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
30
Structure
avg 35
42
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 50%+
Rank #813619
-54 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 27%
Score 72/100

silk.ge ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 50%+) than in AI search (Top 27%). This is the 'Visibility Gap' pattern — implementing the recommendations above can help close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why silk.ge ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
Industry
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat3.0×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

60/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

47 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

0 chars
Missing

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 2
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 17
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://silk.ge/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ka-GE
  • ✅ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — მთავარი გვერდი - Silk
  • ✗ og:description
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

71/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 30/100 — Low
Structured Elements 6 elements (6 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words220
Raw Density2.7%
💡Low structure score (30/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 6 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

3/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

64
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability64/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (10/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

33%
🗑️ 67%
Useful Content (7.7 KB)Bloat (15.4 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio3.0× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context93% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage26 / 28 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

50 Entropy
Fair Token Bloat: Medium
Noise Ratio: 66.5% · SNR: 0.50 · Signal: 1979 / Noise: 3935 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of silk.ge and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
This platform facilitates instant money transfers and savings accounts using Georgian bank cards, offering a seamless and secure financial experience.
Target Audience
Customers of TBC, Liberty, Basis Bank, and Halik Bank in Georgia seeking convenient access to funds and savings options.
Pricing Model
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
🔗 Integration Partners
TBCLiberty
🏆 Competitive Moat
Secure and convenient money transfers with a focus on user-friendly access to savings accounts and a wide range of bank card integrations.
📊 Content Depth
3/10
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of specific pricing information
• Limited details on the user interface and functionality
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-04-06

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Servernginx/1.18.0 (Ubuntu)
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time677 ms
Raw HTML Size23.1 KB
Visible Text Size7.7 KB

Performance & Speed

80/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

677 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

252
DOM nodes
23 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

68/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://silk.ge/sitemap_index.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

3
internal links
8
external links
Limited internal links — consider adding contextual cross-links

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ka-GE
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 52/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for silk.ge
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/silk.ge" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=silk.ge" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
52
Single-page score
+8
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
60
Avg across 10 pages · Range 60–60
Total Words
2080
Avg Bloat
22.7×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://silk.ge/pricing
მთავარი გვერდი - Silk
pricing 60 22.7× 208
https://silk.ge/about
მთავარი გვერდი - Silk
about 60 22.7× 208
https://silk.ge/products
მთავარი გვერდი - Silk
product 60 22.7× 208
https://silk.ge/features
მთავარი გვერდი - Silk
product 60 22.7× 208
https://silk.ge/blog
მთავარი გვერდი - Silk
blog 60 22.7× 208
https://silk.ge/docs
მთავარი გვერდი - Silk
docs 60 22.7× 208
https://silk.ge/case-studies
მთავარი გვერდი - Silk
social-proof 60 22.7× 208
https://silk.ge/contact
მთავარი გვერდი - Silk
support 60 22.7× 208
https://silk.ge/faq
მთავარი გვერდი - Silk
support 60 22.7× 208
https://silk.ge/integrations
მთავარი გვერდი - Silk
integrations 60 22.7× 208
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/pricing/ 1 60 0% 22.8× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 60 0% 22.8× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 60 0% 22.8× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 60 0% 22.8× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 60 0% 22.8× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 60 0% 22.8× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 1 60 0% 22.8× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 60 0% 22.8× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 60 0% 22.8× High JS Bloat
/integrations/ 1 60 0% 22.8× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
instagram.com ×10
play.google.com ×10
facebook.com ×10
apps.apple.com ×10
linkedin.com ×10
tiktok.com ×10
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/silk.ge

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to silk.ge. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
silk.ge (this site) 52 72 Custom / Proprietary 3.0× 1
uem.br 62 74 Custom / Proprietary 2.6× 0 Compare →
hpu.edu 62 72 Custom / Proprietary 1.6× 0 Compare →
theblackfriday.com 62 77 Express 2.6× 1 Compare →
quinel.com.mt 62 76 WordPress 2.2× 1 Compare →
jackworld.us 62 15 Cloudflare Pages 2.7× 0 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite silk.ge when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to silk.ge. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Silk?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Silk does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Silk work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Silk."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for silk.ge:

Current Score
72
Projected Score
75
Improvement
+3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →