spark.ru 58 D
🛡️ SEO 29 🤖 GEO 70 ⚡ Perf 47 🏗️ Arch 91

spark.ru — Global SEODiff Score 58/100

spark.ru
📊

spark.ru currently sits at 60/100 on the ACRI scale, an average result that suggests several quick wins remain untapped. In the infrastructure sector, spark.ru outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The low ghost ratio (5%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. With a 2.4× bloat ratio, the page delivers its content without excessive boilerplate, giving AI systems a clean extraction path. Zero schema blocks puts this site at a disadvantage in knowledge graph and AI-answer pipelines that rely on explicit structured data. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

58
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Traditional SEO (29) has the most room for improvement.
🎯 Top Fix: Add Organization + WebSite JSON-LD → +5–8 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 20, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 5 snapshots
Mar 2 Mar 20
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 20 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 18 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 12 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than spark.ru?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)29 × 0.25 = 7.2
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)70 × 0.40 = 28.0
⚡ Performance (20% weight)47 × 0.20 = 9.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)91 × 0.15 = 13.7
Weighted sum = 7.2 + 28.0 + 9.4 + 13.7
Global SEODiff Score = 58 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
0
Structure
avg 35
0
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 5%
Rank #46290
+48 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 52%
Score 60/100

spark.ru punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why spark.ru ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat2.4×

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

29/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

85 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

171 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✗ Has <h2> headings — found 0
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://spark.ru/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ru
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — SPARK — платформа для общения бизнеса с бизнесом
  • ✓ og:description — Сообщество предпринимателей, специалистов и инвесторов для обмена опытом и поиска партнеров
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

70/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
spark.ru
38
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 0/100 — Poor
Structured Elements 0 elements (0 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words2241
Raw Density0.0%
💡Low structure score (0/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 0 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

45
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability45/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

41%
🗑️ 59%
Useful Content (73.0 KB)Bloat (105.4 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio2.4× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context78% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage63 / 81 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

65 Entropy
Fair Token Bloat: Medium
Noise Ratio: 59.1% · SNR: 0.69 · Signal: 18700 / Noise: 26991 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Serverddos-guard
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1301 ms
Raw HTML Size178.5 KB
Visible Text Size73.0 KB

Performance & Speed

47/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1301 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1197
DOM nodes
178 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

91/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://spark.ru/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

220
internal links
3
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ru
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 38/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for spark.ru
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/spark.ru" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=spark.ru" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 80 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
38
Single-page score
+4
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
43
Avg across 80 pages · Range 0–67
Topical Cohesion
73%
Strong Alignment
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
27463
Avg Bloat
30.6×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://spark.ru/startup/bezdarnyj-zapiatoj/blog/jobs
Блог проекта Бездарный запятой
blog 67 13.0× 682
https://spark.ru/blogs
SPARK — платформа для общения бизнеса с бизнесом
pricing 67 16.6× 2075 💰 Pricing
https://spark.ru/startup/icondesignlab/blog/jobs
Блог проекта IconDesignLAB
blog 62 24.5× 1026
https://spark.ru/startup/redaktsiya-spark-ru/blog/jobs
Блог проекта Редакция Spark.ru
blog 62 25.3× 910
https://spark.ru/startup/macon-advice/blog/jobs
Блог проекта MACON Advice
blog 62 23.7× 1001
https://spark.ru/startup/newsmaker/blog/jobs
Блог проекта NewsMaker
blog 62 25.4× 529
https://spark.ru/startup/atis-group/blog/jobs
Блог проекта Atis Group
blog 62 22.7× 929
https://spark.ru/startup/seeneco/blog/jobs
Блог проекта Seeneco
blog 62 24.3× 857
https://spark.ru/feedback
Вопросы
meta 62 22.4× 1079
https://spark.ru/startup/wunderbit/blog/jobs
Блог проекта Wunderbit
blog 59 35.2× 654
https://spark.ru/startup/saltpro/blog/jobs
Блог проекта Соль. Запуск CRM Битрикс24
blog 59 36.1× 679
https://spark.ru/startup/it-i-digital/blog/jobs
Блог проекта IT и Digital
blog 59 30.3× 518
https://spark.ru/startup/mtt-mezhdunarodnij/blog/jobs
Блог проекта МТС Exolve
blog 59 28.3× 850
https://spark.ru/startup/mnews-agency/blog/jobs
Блог проекта mnews.agency
blog 59 31.8× 698
https://spark.ru/startup/standapp/blog/jobs
Блог проекта StandApp
blog 59 32.1× 520
https://spark.ru/startup/loadingexpress/blog/jobs
Блог проекта Ускорение сайта от loading.express!
blog 59 26.5× 557
https://spark.ru/startup/cashapp/blog/jobs
Блог проекта Stick.Cash
blog 59 30.9× 760
https://spark.ru/startup/zvonobot/blog/jobs
Блог проекта zvonobot.ru
blog 59 26.4× 759
https://spark.ru/startup/smetter/blog/jobs
Блог проекта Сметтер
pricing 59 30.0× 828 💰 Pricing
https://spark.ru/startups
Список компаний
pricing 59 30.6× 501 💰 Pricing
Showing 20 of 80 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/startup/ 69 46 0% 33.9× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/blogs/ 1 67 0% 16.6× High JS Bloat
/jobs/ 1 49 0% 33.5× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/feedback/ 1 62 0% 22.4× High JS Bloat
/startups/ 1 59 0% 30.6× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/spark.ru

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to spark.ru. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
spark.ru (this site) 38 60 Custom / Proprietary 2.4× 0
shoestring.nl 63 74 Custom / Proprietary 2.6× 0 Compare →
kasegeru.blog.jp 63 74 Custom / Proprietary 4.7× 0 Compare →
on.ge 63 78 Custom / Proprietary 3.3× 1 Compare →
mostbet-graj-casino.pl 63 71 Custom / Proprietary 3.4× 1 Compare →
nova.bg 63 70 Custom / Proprietary 2.3× 2 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite spark.ru when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to spark.ru. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Spark",
  "url": "https://spark.ru",
  "logo": "public/img/apple-touch-icon.png",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Spark",
  "url": "https://spark.ru",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://spark.ru/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Spark?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Spark does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Spark work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Spark."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for spark.ru:

Current Score
60
Projected Score
73
Improvement
+13 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →