sport.de 55 D
🛡️ SEO 34 🤖 GEO 67 ⚡ Perf 36 🏗️ Arch 83

sport.de — Global SEODiff Score 55/100

sport.de
📊

sport.de achieves a 70/100 on the AI-Crawler Reality Index, reflecting above-average readiness for AI-driven discovery. Compared to other infrastructure sites (avg score: 57), sport.de performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. A 17.6× token bloat ratio means crawlers must process significantly more tokens to reach the actual content — a drag on extraction efficiency. Minimal structured data (1 block) limits the site's ability to communicate entity relationships to AI systems. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

55
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Traditional SEO (34) has the most room for improvement.
🎯 Top Fix: Add HSTS header → +2 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 15 snapshots
Mar 3 Mar 21
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 12 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 12 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 11 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 11 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 10 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than sport.de?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)34 × 0.25 = 8.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)67 × 0.40 = 26.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)36 × 0.20 = 7.2
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)83 × 0.15 = 12.4
Weighted sum = 8.5 + 26.8 + 7.2 + 12.4
Global SEODiff Score = 55 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
97
Rendering
avg 93
50
Structure
avg 35
2
Schema
avg 9
55
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.8%
Rank #7820
+33 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 33%
Score 70/100

sport.de punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why sport.de ranks here

Tech stackExpress
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat17.6×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

34/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

67 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

135 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 102
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.sport.de/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → de
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Sportnachrichten: News, Ergebnisse, Liveticker, Tabellen | sport.de
  • ✓ og:description — ⚠ Liveticker, Ergebnisse, Tabellen, Transfers ➤ Aktuelle News der Fußball-Bundesliga, NFL, Formel 1, Biathlon, Boxen, Darts u.v.m.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

67/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
sport.de
56
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 10%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 50/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 494 elements (350 lists, 48 rows, 96 headers)
Total Words6502
Raw Density7.6%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

1/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

45
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability45/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (95/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

5%
🗑️ 95%
Useful Content (41.1 KB)Bloat (683.4 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio17.6× — Heavy

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage501 / 501 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 94.3% · SNR: 0.06 · Signal: 10531 / Noise: 174962 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of sport.de and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
This website provides a live schedule and results for the Liga Argentina de Baloncesto, a professional basketball league in Argentina.
Target Audience
Basketball fans, Liga Argentina de Baloncesto supporters, sports enthusiasts in Argentina, and individuals seeking detailed basketball schedules and results.
Pricing Model
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
🏆 Competitive Moat
Real-time data and comprehensive league coverage for a specific basketball league.
📊 Content Depth
6/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Team names are consistently used in URLsGame dates and times are prominently displayedTables of results are generated automatically
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Limited SEO signals beyond basic data presentation
• Lack of user accounts or personalization features
• No mobile app or responsive design
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-02-28

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkExpress
AI-Readiness Score55/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time567 ms
Raw HTML Size724.6 KB
Visible Text Size41.1 KB

Performance & Speed

36/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

567 ms
Acceptable — room for improvement

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

6915
DOM nodes
725 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → public, max-age=120
  • ✓ CDN cache status → HIT
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
outbrain.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

83/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.sport.de/sitemap/sitemap.liveticker.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

774
internal links
257
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → de
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 56/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for sport.de
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/sport.de" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=sport.de" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 1010 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
56
Single-page score
-6
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
51
Avg across 1010 pages · Range 0–72
Topical Cohesion
6%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
889218
Avg Bloat
66.1×
RAG Fractures [?]
6
⚠️
6 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 6 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.sport.de/basketball/co12614/liga-argentinia/spielplan/
Basketball Liga Argentinia (Argentinien) 2024/2025 - Spielplan
pricing 72 19.8× 7948 💰 Pricing
https://www.sport.de/basketball/co12686/cba/spielplan/
Basketball CBA (China) 2025/2026 - Spielplan
pricing 67 23.1× 8484 💰 Pricing
https://www.sport.de/basketball/co14006/b1-league/spielplan/
Basketball B1 League (Japan) 2025/2026 - Spielplan
pricing 67 22.4× 15072 💰 Pricing
https://www.sport.de/basketball/bih-prvenstvo/spielplan/
Basketball Prvenstvo BiH (Bosnien-Herzegowina) 2025/2026 - Spielplan
pricing 64 25.7× 3839 💰 Pricing
https://www.sport.de/basketball/co12611/lnb/spielplan/
Basketball LNB (Argentinien) 2025/2026 - Spielplan
pricing 64 22.3× 6367 💰 Pricing
https://www.sport.de/basketball/co12623/top-division-1/spielplan/
Basketball Top Division 1 (Belgien) 2025/2026 - Spielplan
pricing 64 26.5× 4020 💰 Pricing
https://www.sport.de/basketball/co12755/1-division/spielplan/
Basketball 1. Division (Finnland) 2025/2026 - Spielplan
pricing 64 28.5× 3084 💰 Pricing
https://www.sport.de/basketball/co12971/a1/spielplan/
Basketball Frauen A1 (Griechenland) 2025/2026 - Spielplan
pricing 64 36.2× 1975 💰 Pricing
https://www.sport.de/basketball/co13001/elite-league/spielplan/
Basketball Elite League (Griechenland) 2025/2026 - Spielplan
pricing 64 30.2× 3473 💰 Pricing
https://www.sport.de/basketball/co13007/a1/spielplan/
Basketball Frauen A1 (Italien) 2025/2026 - Spielplan
pricing 64 26.8× 2961 💰 Pricing
https://www.sport.de/basketball/co13052/asia-cup-qualifikation/spielplan/
Basketball Asia Cup Qualifikation 2024/2025 - Spielplan
pricing 64 35.8× 1807 💰 Pricing
https://www.sport.de/basketball/co13079/zweite-liga/spielplan/
Basketball Zweite Liga (Österreich) 2025/2026 - Spielplan
pricing 64 25.0× 4267 💰 Pricing
https://www.sport.de/basketball/co13085/1-liga/spielplan/
Basketball 1 Liga (Polen) 2025/2026 - Spielplan
pricing 64 24.0× 5910 💰 Pricing
https://www.sport.de/basketball/co13193/lkl/spielplan/
Basketball LKL (Litauen) 2025/2026 - Spielplan
pricing 64 29.6× 2898 💰 Pricing
https://www.sport.de/basketball/co13382/korisliiga/spielplan/
Basketball Frauen Korisliiga (Finnland) 2025/2026 - Spielplan
pricing 64 30.4× 2558 💰 Pricing
https://www.sport.de/basketball/co13400/lpb/spielplan/
Basketball LPB (Portugal) 2025/2026 - Spielplan
pricing 64 29.2× 2887 💰 Pricing
https://www.sport.de/basketball/co13412/lfb/spielplan/
Basketball Frauen LFB (Portugal) 2025/2026 - Spielplan
pricing 64 35.4× 2210 💰 Pricing
https://www.sport.de/basketball/co13817/pro-b/spielplan/
Basketball Élite 2 (Frankreich) 2025/2026 - Spielplan
pricing 64 24.8× 7318 💰 Pricing
https://www.sport.de/basketball/co13823/lfb/spielplan/
Basketball Frauen LFB (Frankreich) 2025/2026 - Spielplan
pricing 64 25.6× 3470 💰 Pricing
https://www.sport.de/basketball/co13835/liga-femenina/spielplan/
Basketball Frauen Liga Femenina (Spanien) 2025/2026 - Spielplan
pricing 64 23.9× 5416 💰 Pricing
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/basketball/ 428 56 1% 46.3× Bot Blocked
/american-football/ 44 55 1% 50.7× Bot Blocked
/badminton/ 17 61 1% 43.2× Bot Blocked
/baseball/ 11 56 1% 47.0× Bot Blocked
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 1010 pages
serviceportal.sport.de ×993
de-de.facebook.com ×993
instagram.com ×993
company.rtl.com ×993
ad-alliance.de ×993
twitter.com ×993
shop.n-tv.de ×993
heimspiel.de ×993
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/sport.de

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to sport.de. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
sport.de (this site) 56 70 Express 17.6× 1
puuilo.fi 81 87 Express 4.1× 2 Compare →
wholesaleweddingsuperstore.com.au 81 87 Express 5.1× 3 Compare →
platinumshop.hu 81 87 Express 2.8× 2 Compare →
bureau-vallee.gf 81 86 Express 2.1× 3 Compare →
yenny-elateneo.com 81 89 Express 5.7× 127 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite sport.de when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to sport.de. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Sport",
  "url": "https://sport.de",
  "logo": "https://s.hs-data.com/comon/prj/isdc/v2/sportde/static/gfx/favicon-32x32.png",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 5% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Sport?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Sport does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Sport work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Sport."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for sport.de:

Current Score
70
Projected Score
84
Improvement
+14 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →