storebrand.no 66 C
🛡️ SEO 46 🤖 GEO 78 ⚡ Perf 59 🏗️ Arch 78

storebrand.no — Global SEODiff Score 66/100

storebrand.no
📊

At 73/100, the ACRI for storebrand.no indicates strong fundamentals in AI extractability, surpassing the majority of indexed sites. Within the social vertical, this places storebrand.no above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. A ghost ratio of 15% indicates a mixed rendering strategy where core content loads server-side but interactive sections rely on JavaScript. The 9.9× token bloat ratio falls within the normal range, though there is room to trim navigation, footer, and script overhead. No structured data was detected, which means AI systems must infer all entities and relationships from raw HTML alone. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

66
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (46) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add Organization + WebSite JSON-LD → +5–8 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 18, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 4 snapshots
Mar 2 Mar 18
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 12 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than storebrand.no?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)46 × 0.25 = 11.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)78 × 0.40 = 31.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)59 × 0.20 = 11.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)78 × 0.15 = 11.7
Weighted sum = 11.5 + 31.2 + 11.8 + 11.7
Global SEODiff Score = 66 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
94
Rendering
avg 93
72
Structure
avg 35
0
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 2%
Rank #21772
+23 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 25%
Score 73/100

storebrand.no punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why storebrand.no ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
Industrysocial
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat9.9×

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

46/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

77 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

145 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 2
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.storebrand.no/privat/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → no
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Storebrand – Pensjon, forsikring, bank, sparing og investering
  • ✓ og:description — Ta gode og trygge økonomiske valg med Storebrand. Vi tilbyr forsikring, banktjenester, pensjon og spareprodukter. Invester i fremtiden med oss.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

78/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the social sector, martin-sad.ru (ACRI: 87) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
storebrand.no
53
Your ACRI Score
87
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. martin-sad.ru has schema coverage of 63 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 15%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 72/100 — Good
Structured Elements 84 elements (84 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words547
Raw Density15.4%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

55
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability55/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

10%
🗑️ 90%
Useful Content (20.1 KB)Bloat (178.5 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio9.9× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context8% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage1 / 12 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Only 8% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 89.9% · SNR: 0.11 · Signal: 5133 / Noise: 45708 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of storebrand.no and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Storebrand provides financial services including insurance, banking, pensions, and savings products.
Target Audience
Customers seeking financial security and investment solutions.
Pricing Model
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
🏆 Competitive Moat
SEMANTIC VOID
📊 Content Depth
2/10
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-01

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
ServerApache
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time960 ms
Raw HTML Size198.6 KB
Visible Text Size20.1 KB

Performance & Speed

59/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

960 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

856
DOM nodes
199 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

78/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.storebrand.no/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

94
internal links
8
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → no
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 53/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for storebrand.no
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/storebrand.no" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=storebrand.no" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 107 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
53
Single-page score
-7
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
47
Avg across 107 pages · Range 0–72
Topical Cohesion
12%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
52015
Avg Bloat
192.0×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.storebrand.no/akademikerne/dette-bor-du-vite-om-forsikringen-kritisk-sykdom
Kritisk sykdom-forsikring via Akademikerne - Storebrand
pricing 72 17.4× 839 💰 Pricing
https://www.storebrand.no/akademikerne/tre-fordeler-ved-gruppelivsforsikring
Gruppelivsforsikring via Akademikerne - Storebrand
other 72 16.8× 871
https://www.storebrand.no/privat/sparing/tjen-penger-pa-utleie
Leie ut tingene dine? Her er ekspertenes beste råd - Storebrand
pricing 67 30.2× 1291 💰 Pricing
https://www.storebrand.no/privat/sparing/sparing-og-investering/delphi-global
Suksessformelen som har knust aksjemarkedet over tid - Storebrand
other 67 32.5× 1199
https://www.storebrand.no/akademikerne/disse-forsikringene-bor-du-ha-som-student
Student? Disse forsikringene bør du ha - Storebrand
other 67 20.7× 680
https://www.storebrand.no/privat/sparing/sparing-og-investering/storebrand-fremtid-smarte-portefoljer/-summen-av-var-kompetanse-pa-ett-sted
– Summen av vår kompetanse på ett sted - Storebrand
pricing 67 34.1× 1113 💰 Pricing
https://www.storebrand.no/privat/tema/langsiktig-sparing/den-kreative-superspareren
Student og supersparer gir deg gode sparetips - Storebrand
pricing 67 20.9× 1899 💰 Pricing
https://www.storebrand.no/privat/tema/pengene-til-a-vokse/-arvepenger-forer-ofte-til-mye-folelser-og-mange-sporsmal
– Arvepenger fører ofte til mye følelser og mange spørsmål - Storebrand
pricing 67 25.4× 1533 💰 Pricing
https://www.storebrand.no/privat/tema/pengene-til-a-vokse/disse-fondene-er-et-godt-alternativ-til-sparekontoen
Likviditetsfond vs sparekonto - Storebrand
other 67 31.9× 1226
https://www.storebrand.no/akademikerne/derfor-bor-du-forsikre-barnet-ditt
Medlem av Akademikerne? Les om barneforsikring - Storebrand
other 67 21.1× 682
https://www.storebrand.no/privat/forsikring/barneforsikring/barnehage-typiske-sykdommer
Går barnet ditt i barnehagen? Da vil du mest sannsynlig møte disse sykdommene - Storebrand
other 67 29.9× 1326
https://www.storebrand.no/privat/forsikring/husforsikring/rotter-og-mus-i-hus
Rotter og mus kan koste deg dyrt - Storebrand
other 67 30.9× 1276
https://www.storebrand.no/bedrift/best-avkastning-for-pensjonsprofiler
Storebrand er i avkastningstoppen blant pensjonsleverandører - Storebrand
pricing 64 33.5× 1032 💰 Pricing
https://www.storebrand.no/privat/sparing/fondssparing/bli-investor-med-enkle-grep
Slik når du sparemålene dine - Storebrand
pricing 64 43.4× 884 💰 Pricing
https://www.storebrand.no/privat/tema/pengene-til-a-vokse/storebrand-global-multifactor
Datamaskiner plukker vinneraksjer - Storebrand
other 64 33.9× 1147
https://www.storebrand.no/privat/tema/pensjonsoversikt/spare-til-pensjon-i-60-arene
I 60-årene? Derfor bør du spare til pensjon - Storebrand
pricing 64 45.6× 842 💰 Pricing
https://www.storebrand.no/privat/bank-og-lan/banksparing/handle-julegaver-billig
Tips til julegavehandelen - Storebrand
pricing 64 33.0× 1163 💰 Pricing
https://www.storebrand.no/privat/bank-og-lan/boliglan/boligmarkedet-2024
Boligmarkedet i 2024 - Storebrand
pricing 64 33.0× 1164 💰 Pricing
https://www.storebrand.no/privat/bank-og-lan/boliglan/lav-belaningsgrad-og-avdragsfrihet
Tre tips til deg med lavt boliglån - Storebrand
other 64 38.3× 986
https://www.storebrand.no/bedrift/5-ting-som-kjennetegner-en-god-leder
5 ting som kjennetegner en god leder - Storebrand
other 64 31.5× 1088
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/privat/ 61 52 0% 164.7× High JS Bloat
/bedrift/ 21 46 0% 140.0× High JS Bloat
/infosider/ 8 30 0% 728.0× High JS Bloat
/akademikerne/ 4 70 0% 19.0× High JS Bloat
/min-side/ 2 41 0% 577.5× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 1 20 1% 50.7× Bot Blocked
/blog/ 1 20 1% 50.7× Bot Blocked
/contact/ 1 20 1% 50.7× Bot Blocked
/case-studies/ 1 20 1% 50.7× Bot Blocked
/en/ 1 46 0% 42.7× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 20 1% 50.7× Bot Blocked
/docs/ 1 20 1% 50.7× Bot Blocked
/integrations/ 1 20 1% 50.7× Bot Blocked
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/about/ 1 20 1% 50.7× Bot Blocked
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/storebrand.no

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar social Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to storebrand.no. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
storebrand.no (this site) 53 73 Custom / Proprietary 9.9× 0
epto.it 78 86 Custom / Proprietary 6.6× 2 Compare →
mixupload.com 78 86 Custom / Proprietary 5.3× 2 Compare →
faunamarket.com 78 84 Custom / Proprietary 4.0× 2 Compare →
greenfish.com.ua 78 80 Custom / Proprietary 2.3× 1 Compare →
ttt.ua 78 85 Custom / Proprietary 3.9× 2 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite storebrand.no when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to storebrand.no. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Storebrand",
  "url": "https://storebrand.no",
  "logo": "https://assets.storebrand.no/elements/web24/1.0.0/images/favicons/apple-touch-icon.png",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Storebrand",
  "url": "https://storebrand.no",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://storebrand.no/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Storebrand?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Storebrand does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Storebrand work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Storebrand."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for storebrand.no:

Current Score
73
Projected Score
89
Improvement
+16 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →