storj.io 64 C
🛡️ SEO 58 🤖 GEO 59 ⚡ Perf 74 🏗️ Arch 73

storj.io — Global SEODiff Score 64/100

storj.io
📊

At 68/100, the ACRI for storj.io indicates strong fundamentals in AI extractability, surpassing the majority of indexed sites. Compared to other developer sites (avg score: 57), storj.io performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Content is delivered server-side, meaning bots and AI agents can parse the full page without executing JavaScript. A 15.8× token bloat ratio means crawlers must process significantly more tokens to reach the actual content — a drag on extraction efficiency. Structured data coverage is solid at 2 blocks, covering core entities — expanding to include FAQ or Breadcrumb schemas could strengthen the profile further. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

64
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (58) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add HSTS header → +2 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 25 snapshots
Feb 22 Mar 21
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 15 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than storj.io?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)58 × 0.25 = 14.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)59 × 0.40 = 23.6
⚡ Performance (20% weight)74 × 0.20 = 14.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)73 × 0.15 = 10.9
Weighted sum = 14.5 + 23.6 + 14.8 + 10.9
Global SEODiff Score = 64 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
97
Rendering
avg 93
0
Structure
avg 35
44
Schema
avg 9
75
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 3%
Rank #25197
+36 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 38%
Score 68/100

storj.io punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why storj.io ranks here

Tech stackWebflow
Industrydeveloper
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage2 blocks
Token bloat15.8×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

58/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

45 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

71 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 12
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.storj.io
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Storj - Smarter cloud storage for your business.
  • ✓ og:description — Make the switch to Storj and get better global performance, unparalleled security, and save 80% on your cloud costs while cutting your carbon footprint.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

59/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the developer sector, hikkoshizamurai.jp (ACRI: 88) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
storj.io
34
Your ACRI Score
88
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. hikkoshizamurai.jp has schema coverage of 5 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 10%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 0/100 — Poor
Structured Elements 0 elements (0 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words762
Raw Density0.0%
💡Low structure score (0/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 0 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks2 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

1/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

42
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability42/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (40/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

6%
🗑️ 94%
Useful Content (5.1 KB)Bloat (74.7 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio15.8× — Heavy

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context72% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage41 / 57 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 93.7% · SNR: 0.07 · Signal: 1294 / Noise: 19115 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWebflow
AI-Readiness Score75/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time619 ms
Raw HTML Size79.7 KB
Visible Text Size5.1 KB

Performance & Speed

74/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

619 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

684
DOM nodes
80 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✓ CDN cache status → HIT
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

3
tracker scripts
2
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.comjs.hs-scripts.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

73/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.storj.io/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

88
internal links
8
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 34/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for storj.io
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/storj.io" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=storj.io" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 103 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
34
Single-page score
+34
Subpages outperform homepage
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
69
Avg across 103 pages · Range 0–85
Topical Cohesion
20%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
105826
Avg Bloat
18.6×
RAG Fractures [?]
1
⚠️
1 RAG-Chunking Fracture Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 1 page will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.storj.io/blog/best-mountpoint-for-s3-alternative
Mountpoint-S3 Alternatives: POSIX-Compatible, High-Performance S3 for Linux and Serverless in AWS.
pricing 85 9.5× 1265 💰 Pricing
https://www.storj.io/blog/breaking-the-ai-bottleneck-how-object-mount-is-transforming-ai-data-access
Breaking the AI bottleneck: How Object Mount is transforming AI data access.
pricing 85 8.4× 1489 💰 Pricing
https://www.storj.io/blog/changing-the-security-paradigm-to-push-access-management-to-the-edge
Changing the Security Paradigm to Push Access Management to the Edge
pricing 85 5.4× 2408 💰 Pricing
https://www.storj.io/blog/cloud-based-mutlimedia-library-transformation
Use the Decentralized Cloud to Transform Your Multimedia Library Into Your Personal Netflix
pricing 85 9.8× 1166 💰 Pricing
https://www.storj.io/blog/comparing-the-economics-of-centralized-and-decentralized-cloud-storage
Comparing the Economics of Centralized and Decentralized Cloud Storage
pricing 85 9.0× 1329 💰 Pricing
https://www.storj.io/blog/content-in-the-cloud-how-storj-stays-true-to-core-values
Content in the Cloud: How Storj stays true to core values.
pricing 85 5.7× 2321 💰 Pricing
https://www.storj.io/blog/customers-and-featured-forrester-analyst-advise-enterprises-on-decentralized-storage
Customers and Featured Forrester Analyst Advise Enterprises on Decentralized Storage
pricing 85 6.5× 1933 💰 Pricing
https://www.storj.io/blog/diversity-equity-and-inclusion-at-storj-labs
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion at Storj Labs
pricing 85 5.2× 2593 💰 Pricing
https://www.storj.io/blog/end-users-are-ready-for-web3-what-app-developers-need-to-know
End Users Are Ready for Web3—What App Developers Need to Know
pricing 85 8.4× 1444 💰 Pricing
https://www.storj.io/blog/guest-brent-ellis-of-forrester-says-cloud-storage-has-a-disrupter-3-ways-you-can-benefit-now
3 ways you can benefit from cloud storage's disrupter
pricing 85 6.8× 1840 💰 Pricing
https://www.storj.io/blog/has-fsx-lost-its-luster
Has FSx lost its luster?
pricing 85 9.8× 1224 💰 Pricing
https://www.storj.io/blog/a-brief-overview-of-kademlia-and-its-use-in-various-decentralized-platforms
A brief overview of Kademlia and its use in various decentralized platforms
pricing 85 5.5× 2391 💰 Pricing
https://www.storj.io/blog/accelerating-blockchain-node-synchronization-decentralized-cloud-storage
Accelerating Blockchain Node Synchronization with Decentralized Cloud Storage
pricing 85 9.5× 1254 💰 Pricing
https://www.storj.io/blog/announcing-storj-ipfs-pinning-service-durable-performant-decentralized-nft-and-dapp-storage
Announcing Storj IPFS Pinning Service: Durable & Secure Decentralized NFT and dApp Storage
pricing 85 9.2× 1250 💰 Pricing
https://www.storj.io/blog/a-case-for-decentralized-cloud-storage-and-delivery
Cloud Object Storage Services | Storj
pricing 80 10.8× 1849 💰 Pricing
https://www.storj.io/blog/a-look-at-storj-labs-decentralized-cloud-storage-architecture-with-jt-olio
Cloud Object Storage Services | Storj
pricing 80 10.8× 1849 💰 Pricing
https://www.storj.io/blog/four-advancements-that-led-to-decentralized-cloud-storage
Cloud Object Storage Services | Storj
pricing 80 10.8× 1849 💰 Pricing
https://www.storj.io/blog/decentralized-cloud-storage-is-a-paradigm-shift-in-ransomware-resistance
Cloud Object Storage Services | Storj
pricing 80 10.8× 1849 💰 Pricing
https://www.storj.io/blog/busting-five-common-myths-about-decentralized-storage
Cloud Object Storage Services | Storj
pricing 80 10.8× 1849 💰 Pricing
https://www.storj.io/blog/announcing-the-new-storj-hosted-s3-compatible-gateway
What is S3 Compatibility?
pricing 75 15.5× 719 💰 Pricing
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/blog/ 93 71 0% 19.0× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 2 67 0% 11.0× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 67 0% 28.4× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 1 67 0% 28.4× High JS Bloat
/integrations/ 1 59 0% 22.1× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/about/ 1 67 0% 24.8× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 67 0% 28.4× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 103 pages
github.com ×99
reddit.com ×92
storj.dev ×91
docs.storj.io ×91
supportdcs.storj.io ×91
youtube.com ×91
instagram.com ×91
forum.storj.io ×91
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/storj.io

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar developer Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to storj.io. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
storj.io (this site) 34 68 Webflow 15.8× 2
engineering.salesforce.com 59 81 WordPress 15.3× 1 Compare →
thecinemaholic.com 59 81 WordPress 14.9× 1 Compare →
homeandtexture.com 59 82 WordPress 14.8× 1 Compare →
vtdigger.org 59 74 WordPress 18.5× 2 Compare →
mvv.de 59 80 Next.js 19.3× 2 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite storj.io when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to storj.io. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Storj",
  "url": "https://storj.io",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://storj.io/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 6% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Storj?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Storj does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Storj work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Storj."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for storj.io:

Current Score
68
Projected Score
80
Improvement
+12 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →