superhog.com 70 B
🛡️ SEO 61 🤖 GEO 79 ⚡ Perf 74 🏗️ Arch 57

superhog.com — Global SEODiff Score 70/100

superhog.com
📊

superhog.com shows strong AI visibility with an ACRI of 71/100, outperforming 70% of indexed domains. Within the infrastructure vertical, this places superhog.com above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. The token bloat ratio sits at a lean 4.0×, meaning the ratio of code to visible content is efficient — crawlers spend their token budget on actual information. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

70
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Architecture (57) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add HSTS header → +2 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 20, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 7 snapshots
Feb 24 Mar 20
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 15 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than superhog.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)61 × 0.25 = 15.2
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)79 × 0.40 = 31.6
⚡ Performance (20% weight)74 × 0.20 = 14.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)57 × 0.15 = 8.5
Weighted sum = 15.2 + 31.6 + 14.8 + 8.5
Global SEODiff Score = 70 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
35
Structure
avg 35
2
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 41%
Rank #410067
-11 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 30%
Score 71/100

superhog.com is more visible to Google than to AI models. There's room to improve AI discoverability to match your search reputation. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why superhog.com ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat4.0×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

61/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

64 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

138 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 5
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 7
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://truvi.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-GB
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Truvi | Guest Screening & Damage Protection for Vacation Rentals
  • ✓ og:description — Don't just protect against risk — eliminate it. Truvi is transforming the way property managers and hosts build trust with their guests.
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

79/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
superhog.com
55
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 35/100 — Low
Structured Elements 28 elements (28 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words751
Raw Density3.7%
💡Low structure score (35/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 28 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

56
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability56/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

25%
🗑️ 75%
Useful Content (26.8 KB)Bloat (81.3 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio4.0× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context26% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage23 / 87 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Only 26% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

25 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 75.2% · SNR: 0.33 · Signal: 6866 / Noise: 20801 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of superhog.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Truvi provides professional-grade risk intelligence and damage protection for short-term rental property managers, empowering them to make informed decisions and
Target Audience
Property managers, short-term rental owners, vacation rental operators
Pricing Model
Not specified - access to the new platform is requested via a host services team.
🏆 Competitive Moat
Transparent risk intelligence and rapid claim resolution (6.8 days) compared to platform black boxes.
📊 Content Depth
8/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Short-term rental influencers worth followingThe Airbnb Partnership Model Is ChangingAI and Vacation Rentals
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Reliance on platform verification systems with outdated checks
• Lack of visibility into verification data
• Slow claim resolution processes (30+ days)
• Surrendering control over property access decisions
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-19

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time938 ms
Raw HTML Size108.1 KB
Visible Text Size26.8 KB

Performance & Speed

74/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

938 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

621
DOM nodes
108 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → max-age=600, must-revalidate
  • ✓ CDN cache status → DYNAMIC
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

2
tracker scripts
2
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.comjs.hs-scripts.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

57/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://superhog.com/sitemap_index.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

1
internal links
69
external links
Very few internal links — crawlers may miss important pages

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-GB
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 55/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for superhog.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/superhog.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=superhog.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
55
Single-page score
-32
Severe hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
23
Avg across 10 pages · Range 0–67
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 55, but internal pages average only 23 — a -32-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Topical Cohesion
10%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
2158
Avg Bloat
23.6×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://superhog.com/about
About Us | Truvi
pricing 67 24.2× 632 💰 Pricing
https://superhog.com/integrations integrations 66 18.3× 1233
https://superhog.com/blog
Blog - Truvi
pricing 54 63.9× 214 💰 Pricing
https://superhog.com/contact
Truvi | Contact Us
pricing 44 129.7× 79 💰 Pricing
https://superhog.com/pricing pricing 0 0.0× 0
https://superhog.com/features product 0 0.0× 0
https://superhog.com/products product 0 0.0× 0
https://superhog.com/docs docs 0 0.0× 0
https://superhog.com/case-studies social-proof 0 0.0× 0
https://superhog.com/faq support 0 0.0× 0
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/about/ 1 67 0% 24.2× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 54 0% 63.9× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 66 0% 18.3× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 44 0% 129.7× High JS Bloat
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/superhog.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to superhog.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
superhog.com (this site) 55 71 WordPress 4.0× 1
home.edweb.net 80 88 WordPress 4.1× 1 Compare →
mrwallpaper.com 80 83 WordPress 3.0× 2 Compare →
roudou-pro.com 80 86 WordPress 2.2× 4 Compare →
corporatehousingbyowner.com 80 90 WordPress 7.3× 4 Compare →
oasap.com 80 91 WordPress 11.2× 4 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite superhog.com when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to superhog.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Superhog",
  "url": "https://superhog.com",
  "logo": "https://truvi.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Group-45424297.png",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Superhog?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Superhog does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Superhog work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Superhog."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for superhog.com:

Current Score
71
Projected Score
80
Improvement
+9 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →